| APA |
Tetik Küçükelçi, D., & Evren, A. (2017). A Comparison Between Mıcrosoft Excel Solver and Ncss, Spss Routines for Nonlinear Regression Models. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences, 2(2), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.30931/jetas.336853
|
|
| AMA |
1.Tetik Küçükelçi D, Evren A. A Comparison Between Mıcrosoft Excel Solver and Ncss, Spss Routines for Nonlinear Regression Models. JETAS. 2017;2(2):91-100. doi:10.30931/jetas.336853
|
|
| Chicago |
Tetik Küçükelçi, Didem, and Atıf Evren. 2017. “A Comparison Between Mıcrosoft Excel Solver and Ncss, Spss Routines for Nonlinear Regression Models”. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences 2 (2): 91-100. https://doi.org/10.30931/jetas.336853.
|
|
| EndNote |
Tetik Küçükelçi D, Evren A (October 1, 2017) A Comparison Between Mıcrosoft Excel Solver and Ncss, Spss Routines for Nonlinear Regression Models. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences 2 2 91–100.
|
|
| IEEE |
[1]D. Tetik Küçükelçi and A. Evren, “A Comparison Between Mıcrosoft Excel Solver and Ncss, Spss Routines for Nonlinear Regression Models”, JETAS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 91–100, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.30931/jetas.336853.
|
|
| ISNAD |
Tetik Küçükelçi, Didem - Evren, Atıf. “A Comparison Between Mıcrosoft Excel Solver and Ncss, Spss Routines for Nonlinear Regression Models”. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences 2/2 (October 1, 2017): 91-100. https://doi.org/10.30931/jetas.336853.
|
|
| JAMA |
1.Tetik Küçükelçi D, Evren A. A Comparison Between Mıcrosoft Excel Solver and Ncss, Spss Routines for Nonlinear Regression Models. JETAS. 2017;2:91–100.
|
|
| MLA |
Tetik Küçükelçi, Didem, and Atıf Evren. “A Comparison Between Mıcrosoft Excel Solver and Ncss, Spss Routines for Nonlinear Regression Models”. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, Oct. 2017, pp. 91-100, doi:10.30931/jetas.336853.
|
|
| Vancouver |
1.Didem Tetik Küçükelçi, Atıf Evren. A Comparison Between Mıcrosoft Excel Solver and Ncss, Spss Routines for Nonlinear Regression Models. JETAS. 2017 Oct. 1;2(2):91-100. doi:10.30931/jetas.336853
|
|