An Analysis of Industrial Change in Turkey. II: Sectoral Development and Value Adding

Year 2018, , 205 - 222, 29.12.2018

Ahmet Yücekaya

https://doi.org/10.30931/jetas.448266

Abstract

The success of companies in each sector is related not only with the performance of the company but also with the sectoral development. The value adding level in each sector also creates extra gains that make companies successful. In this paper, regional distribution of the largest companies in Turkey is analyzed. The annual data of the largest companies in the country based on the company performances, sectoral changes, ownership structure and value adding levels are examined below. Trend analysis for sectoral development is made and sectors are classified as rising and falling based on their performances. The data illustrates that the country replaces high value adding sectors with the low value adding ones. The value adding analysis confirms these results. It is also interesting to see that the share of the state rapidly decreases over time while the share of the private ownerships and foreign companies rise rapidly. A trend analysis is also employed for the changes in ownership structure and the results are presented. The overall results depict that the country is becoming a more industrialized; however, new policies and incentives are needed to increase the value adding in each sector.

Keywords

The largest companies, trend analysis, value adding, sectoral analysis

References

• [1] http://www.eesc.europa.eu/?i=portal.en.ccmi.
• [2] Dauth, W., Suedekum, J., “Globalization and local profiles of economic growth and industrial change”, Journal of Economic Geography, 16 (5) (2016): 1007-1034.
• [3] Antonelli, C., The Economics of Localized Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics. 3. Springer Netherlands, 1995.
• [4] Dosi, G., Nelson, R.R., “Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes”, Handbook of the Economics and Innovation. 1 (2010): 51-127.
• [5] Cimoli, M., Dosi,G., Nelson, R., Stiglitz, J.E., “Institutions and Policies Shaping Industrial Development: An Introductory Note”, Industrial Policy and Development. 02-Dosi-C02 (2009):19.
• [6] Khan, M. A., Khan, S. A., “Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Pakistan: A Sectoral Analysis”, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE)-Working Papers, (2011):67.
• [7] O’regan, N., Sims, M.A., “Identifying High Technology Small Firms: A Sectoral Analysis”, Technovation, 28(7) (2008):408-423.
• [8] Susanto, D., Rosson, C. P., Costa, R., “Financial Development and International Trade: Regional and Sectoral Analysis”, The Agricultural & Applied Economics Association 2011 AAEA & NAREA Joint Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, July 24-26, 2011.
• [9] Berument, M.H., Dincer, N.N., Mustafaoglu, Z., “External income shocks and Turkish exports: A sectoral analysis”, Economic Modelling, 37(2014): 476-484.
• [10] Koopman, R., Wang, Z., Wei, S. J., How Much of Chinese Exports Is Really Made in China? Assessing Domestic Value-Added When Processing Trade Is Pervasive” (No. w14109) ( 2008). National Bureau of Economic Research.
• [11] Chen, X., Cheng, L., Fung, K.C., Lau, L. J., The Estimation of Domestic Value-Added and Employment Induced by Exports: An Application to Chinese Exports to the United States, Stanford University, 2004.
• [12] Johnson, R. C., Noguera, G., “Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added”, Journal of International Economics, 86(2) (2012):224-236.
• [13] Jovane, F., Westkämper, E., Williams, D., The ManuFuture Road: Towards Competitive and Sustainable High-Adding-Value Manufacturing. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
• [14] Ramasamy, B., Yeung, M., and Laforet, S., “China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment: Location Choice and Firm Ownership”, Journal of World Business, 47(1) (2012.): 17–25.
• [15] Qiu, Y., “Personal Networks, Institutional Involvement, and Foreign Direct Investment Flows into China’s Interior”, Economic Geography, 81(3) (2005): 261–81.
• [16] Zhou, Y., “Beyond Ethnic Enclaves: Location Strategies of Chinese Producer Service Firms in Los Angeles”, Economic Geography, 74(3) (1998): 228–51.
• [17] Narula, R., “Multinational Firms and The Extractive Sectors in The 21st Century: Can They Drive Development?”, Journal of World Business, 53(1) (2017): 85-91.
• [18] Turkstat, Turkish Statistical Institution, http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/, 2017.
• [19] Sezen, S., “The Impact of Globalization on the Organization of Public Administration: Turkish Case”, Turkish Public Administration Annual, 27-28 (2002): 3-26.
• [20] Altunisik, M.B., Tur, O., Turkey: Challenges of Continuity and Change, New York: Rotledge Curzon, 2005.
• [21] Kazgan, G., Turkiye'de Ekonomik Krizler:(1929-2001) Nedenleri ve Sonuclari Uzerine Karsilastirmali Bir Irdeleme. DEGEV- Turkiye Is Bankasi Yayinlari, Turkey, 2002.
• [22] ISO 500, Istanbul Chamber of Commerce, http://www.iso500.org.tr/
• [23] UN, International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, Statistical papers Series M No. 4/Rev.4, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2008, Available online at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesM/ seriesm_4rev4e.pdf