Genç erkek futbolcularda farklı foam rolling sürelerinin çeviklik, dinamik denge ve sürat üzerine akut etkileri: rastgele bir çapraz tasarım

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma, genç erkek futbolcularda farklı foam rolling (FR) sürelerinin performans ile ilişkili fiziksel uygunluk parametreleri üzerindeki akut etkilerini karşılaştırmayı amaçladı. Yöntem: Deneysel bir rastgeleleştirilmiş çapraz tasarım şeklinde planlanan bu çalışmaya 15 gönüllü genç erkek futbolcu (ortalama yaş 16,73±0,44 yıl) dâhil edildi. Tüm oyuncular 3 ayrı seansı [FR (1 dk), FR (2 dk) ve FR (3 dk)] rastgele bir sırayla 7 gün arayla gerçekleştirdiler. Müdahale öncesi ve sonrasında dinamik denge Y denge testi ile, çeviklik çeviklik t testi ile, sürat ise 20 m sprint testi ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Ön test sonuçlarıyla karşılaştırıldığında, tüm gruplarda dinamik dengede (Zaman (T): p<0,01, F=107,26, ηp2=0,719), çeviklikte (T: p<0,01, F=52,84, ηp2=0,557) ve süratte (T: p<0,01, F=31,98, ηp2=0,432) anlamlı iyileşme gözlendi. Dinamik denge (Grup x Zaman (GxT): p=0,87, F=0,14, ηp2=0,007), çeviklik (GxT: p=0,72, F=0,32, ηp2=0,015) ve sürat (GxT: p=0,23, F=1,51, ηp2=0,067) açısından grup x zaman etkileşimi anlamlı değildi. Sonuç: 1 dakikalik FR antrenmanının, genç erkek futbolcularda dinamik denge, çeviklik ve sürat gibi performansa bağlı fiziksel uygunluk parametrelerini etkili bir şekilde geliştirdiği görülüyor. Güç ve kondisyon antrenörleri, oyuncu gelişimini optimize etmek için bu yaklaşımı antrenman programlarına entegre etmeyi düşünmelidir.

Keywords

• Atletik Performans
• Egzersiz
• Futbol
• Miyofasyal Gevşetme
• Spor

Acute effects of different foam rolling durations on agility, dynamic balance, and speed in young male soccer players: a randomized crossover design

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the acute effects of different foam rolling (FR) durations on agility, dynamic balance, and speed in young male soccer players. Methods: Fifteen volunteer young male soccer players (mean age: 16.73±0.44 years) were included in the study, which was planned as an experimental randomized crossover design. All players performed the 3 sessions [FR (1 min), FR (2 min), and FR (3 min)] on separate occasions in a randomized order, with an interval of 7 days. Before and after the interventions, dynamic balance was assessed with the Y balance test, agility was assessed with the agility t-test, and speed was assessed with the 20- m sprint test. Results: Compared with the pre-test results, significant improvement in dynamic balance (Time (T): p<0.01, F=107.26, η p2=0.719), agility (T: p<0.01, F=52.84, η p2=0.557), and speed (T: p<0.01, F=31.98, η p2=0.432) was observed in all groups. Group × time interaction was not significant for dynamic balance (Group × Time (G x T): p=0.87, F=0.14, η p2=0.007), agility (G × T: p=0.72, F=0.32, η p2=0.015), and speed (G × T: p=0.23, F=1.51, η p2=0.067). Conclusion: FR training for 1 minute appears to effectively enhance dynamic balance, agility, and speed in young male soccer players. Strength and conditioning coaches should consider integrating this approach into their training programs for optimizing player development.

Keywords

• Athletic Performance
• Exercise
• Football
• Myofascial Release
• Sport

References

1. Peacock CA, Krein DD, Silver TA, et al. An acute bout of self-myofascial release in the form of foam rolling improves performance testing. Int J Exerc Sci. 2014;7:202-211.
2. Bushell JE, Dawson SM, Webster MM. Clinical relevance of foam rolling on hip extension angle in a functional lunge position. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:2397-2403.
3. Pearcey GE, Bradbury-Squires DJ, Kawamoto JE, et al. Foam rolling for delayed-onset muscle soreness and recovery of dynamic performance measures. J Athl Train. 2015;50:5-13.
4. Wiewelhove T, Döweling A, Schneider C, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery. Front Physiol. 2019;376.
5. Aboodarda SJ, Spence AJ, Button DC. Pain pressure threshold of a muscle tender spot increases following local and non-local rolling massage. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:1- 10.
6. Kelly S, Beardsley C. Specific and cross-over effects of foam rolling on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11:544- 551.
7. Cheatham SW, Kolber MJ, Cain M, et al. The effects of self‐myofascial release using a foam roll or roller massager on joint range of motion, muscle recovery, and performance: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10:827-838. Davies WT, Myer GD, Read PJ. Is it time we better understood the tests we are using for return to sport decision making following ACL reconstruction? A critical review of the hop tests. Sports Med. 2020;50:485-495.
8. Zouhal H, Abderrahman AB, Dupont G, et al. Effects of neuromuscular training on agility performance in elite soccer players. Front Physiol. 2019;10:947.

9. Young WB, Willey B. Analysis of a reactive agility field test. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13:376- 378.
10. Haugen TA, Tønnessen E, Hisdal J, et al. The role and development of sprinting speed in soccer. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9:432- 441.
11. Shalamzari MH, Minoonejad H, Seidi F. The effects of a self-myofascial release program on isokinetic hamstrings-to-quadriceps strength ratio and range of motion of the knee joint among athletes with hamstring shortness. J Sport Rehabil. 2022;31:391-397.
12. Behm DG, Alizadeh S, Anvar SH, et al. Foam rolling prescription: a clinical commentary. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34:3301-3308.
13. Hughes GA, Ramer LM. Duration of myofascial rolling for optimal recovery, range of motion, and performance: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019;14:845- 859.
14. Glänzel MH, Rodrigues DR, Petter GN, et al. Foam rolling acute effects on myofascial tissue stiffness and muscle strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2023;37:951-968.
15. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175-191.
16. Plisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, et al. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009;4:92-99.
17. Robinson RH, Gribble PA. Support for a reduction in the number of trials needed for the star excursion balance test. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2008;89:364-370.
18. Pauole K, Madole K, Garhammer J, et al. Reliability and validity of the T-test as a measure of agility, leg power, and leg speed in college-aged men and women. J Strength Cond Res. 2000;14:443-450.
19. Richman ED, Tyo BM, Nicks CR. Combined effects of self-myofascial release and dynamic stretching on range of motion, jump, sprint, and agility performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33:1795-1803. Mills B, Mayo B, Tavares F, et al. The effect of tissue flossing on ankle range of motion, jump, and sprint performance in elite rugby union athletes. J Sport Rehabil. 2020;29:282-286.
20. Espí-López GV, Ruescas-Nicolau MA, Castellet- García M, et al. Effectiveness of foam rolling vs. manual therapy in postexercise recovery ınterventions for athletes: A randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res. 2023;37:361-368.
21. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge; 2013.
22. De Benito AM, Valldecabres R, Ceca D, et al. Effect of vibration vs non-vibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue. PeerJ. 2019;7:e8000.
23. Lee CL, Chu IH, Lyu BJ, et al. Comparison of vibration rolling, nonvibration rolling, and static stretching as a warm-up exercise on flexibility, joint proprioception, muscle strength, and balance in young adults. J Sports Sci. 2018;36:2575-2582.
24. Dadfar M, Seidi F. The effects of self-myofascial release on hamstring and gastrocnemius muscles using foam roll on postural sway, knee proprioception, and dynamic balance in recreationally active females. Int J Athl Ther Train. 2022;27:227-233.
25. Maleki M, Faqihsolimani M, Mortezazadeh B. Developing and validating a new wireless wearable device for balance measurement in sport and clinical setting. Ann Appl Sport Sci. 2015;3:59-68.
26. Cho SH, Kim SH. Immediate effect of stretching and ultrasound on hamstring flexibility and proprioception. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28:1806- 1808. Lopez-Samanes A, Del Coso J, Hernández-Davó JL, et al. Acute effects of dynamic versus foam rolling warm-up strategies on physical performance in elite tennis players. Biol Sport. 2021;38:595-601.
27. Agarwal N, Sibbala N, Babu A. Vibration foam rolling versus non-vibration foam rolling as a warm-up exercise on performance in collegiate athletes. Int J Sport Exerc Health Res. 2022;6:63-69.
28. Pelana R, Apriantono T, Bagus B, et al. Effects of foam rolling on blood lactate concentration in elite futsal players. Hum Mov. 2021;22:72-79.
29. Henning CJ, Stovern O, Porcari JP, et al. The acute effects of foam rolling on ankle and knee range of motion, hamstring flexibility, agility, and vertical jump height. Int J Res Exerc Physiol. 2019;14:44-54.
30. Hotfiel T, Swoboda B, Krinner S, et al. Acute effects of lateral thigh foam rolling on arterial tissue perfusion determined by spectral doppler and power doppler ultrasound. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31:893-900.
31. Kaya S, Cug M, Behm DG. Foam rolling during a simulated half-time attenuates subsequent soccer-specific performance decrements. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021;26:193-200.
32. Klich S, Smoter M, Michalik K, et al. Foam rolling and tissue flossing of the triceps surae muscle: An acute effect on achilles tendon stiffness, jump height and sprint performance-A randomized controlled trial. Res Sports Med. 2022;1-14.
33. Wilke J, Niemeyer P, Niederer D, et al. Influence of foam rolling velocity on knee range of motion and tissue stiffness: a randomized, controlled crossover trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2019;28:711- 715.