Research Article

Comparison of characteristic features and quality of life in faller and non-faller transtibial prosthesis users

Volume: 13 Number: 1 April 16, 2026
TR EN

Comparison of characteristic features and quality of life in faller and non-faller transtibial prosthesis users

Abstract

Purpose: Falls and fall-related injuries are common among lower limb prosthesis users. However, the reasons of falls and their impact on health-related quality of life in transtibial prosthesis users (TTPU) remain unclear. We aimed to compare the characteristic differences and quality of life between faller and non-faller TTPU. Methods: Thirty-six TTPU participated in the study. Subjects who had fallen at least once in the past year were classified as fallers. Functional levels were assessed using the Two-Minute Walk Test, the Timed Up & Go Test, and the Functional Reach Test. Results: Sixteen (44.44%) participants were identified as fallers. Fallers had higher age and had longer TUG test durations compared to non-fallers (p<0.05). Differences in working status, reason for amputation, prevalence of diabetes, and walking aid use were significant between fallers and non-fallers (p<0.05). Quality of life levels were similar between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Older age, decreased functional level, not working, having a vascular amputation, having diabetes, and using any walking aid were identified as the characteristic differences of faller transtibial prosthesis users.

Keywords

References

  1. Vanicek N, Strike S, McNaughton L, et al. Gait patterns in transtibial amputee fallers vs. non-fallers: biomechanical differences during level walking. Gait Posture. 2009;29:415-420.
  2. Hunter SW, Batchelor F, Hill KD, et al. Risk factors for falls in people with a lower limb amputation: a systematic review. PM&R. 2017;9:170-180.
  3. Miller WC, Speechley M, Deathe B. The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1031-1037.
  4. Sawers A, Hafner BJ. Using clinical balance tests to assess fall risk among established unilateral lower limb prosthesis users: cutoff scores and associated validity indices. PM&R. 2020;12:16-25.
  5. Wong CK, Chihuri ST, Li G. Risk of fall-related injury in people with lower limb amputations: a prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48:80-85.
  6. Chihuri S, Wong CK. Factors associated with the likelihood of fall-related injury among people with lower limb loss. Inj Epidemiol. 2018;5:42.
  7. Mundell B, Maradit Kremers H, Visscher S, et al. Direct medical costs of accidental falls for adults with transfemoral amputations. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017;41:564-570.
  8. van Velzen JM, van Bennekom CA, Polomski W, et al. Physical capacity and walking ability after lower limb amputation: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:999-1016.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Physiotherapy

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Yasin Yurt *
0000-0002-9561-6267
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti

Cansu Koltak
0000-0002-7665-1040
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti

Özge Çiftçi
0009-0001-9043-9978
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti

Tuğba Paksoy
0009-0009-0249-1820
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti

Merve Paksoy
0009-0009-6003-2892
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti

Publication Date

April 16, 2026

Submission Date

December 14, 2024

Acceptance Date

July 22, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 13 Number: 1

APA
Yurt, Y., Koltak, C., Çiftçi, Ö., Paksoy, T., & Paksoy, M. (2026). Comparison of characteristic features and quality of life in faller and non-faller transtibial prosthesis users. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation, 13(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.15437/jetr.1598812
AMA
1.Yurt Y, Koltak C, Çiftçi Ö, Paksoy T, Paksoy M. Comparison of characteristic features and quality of life in faller and non-faller transtibial prosthesis users. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2026;13(1):25-31. doi:10.15437/jetr.1598812
Chicago
Yurt, Yasin, Cansu Koltak, Özge Çiftçi, Tuğba Paksoy, and Merve Paksoy. 2026. “Comparison of Characteristic Features and Quality of Life in Faller and Non-Faller Transtibial Prosthesis Users”. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation 13 (1): 25-31. https://doi.org/10.15437/jetr.1598812.
EndNote
Yurt Y, Koltak C, Çiftçi Ö, Paksoy T, Paksoy M (April 1, 2026) Comparison of characteristic features and quality of life in faller and non-faller transtibial prosthesis users. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation 13 1 25–31.
IEEE
[1]Y. Yurt, C. Koltak, Ö. Çiftçi, T. Paksoy, and M. Paksoy, “Comparison of characteristic features and quality of life in faller and non-faller transtibial prosthesis users”, Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 25–31, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.15437/jetr.1598812.
ISNAD
Yurt, Yasin - Koltak, Cansu - Çiftçi, Özge - Paksoy, Tuğba - Paksoy, Merve. “Comparison of Characteristic Features and Quality of Life in Faller and Non-Faller Transtibial Prosthesis Users”. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation 13/1 (April 1, 2026): 25-31. https://doi.org/10.15437/jetr.1598812.
JAMA
1.Yurt Y, Koltak C, Çiftçi Ö, Paksoy T, Paksoy M. Comparison of characteristic features and quality of life in faller and non-faller transtibial prosthesis users. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2026;13:25–31.
MLA
Yurt, Yasin, et al. “Comparison of Characteristic Features and Quality of Life in Faller and Non-Faller Transtibial Prosthesis Users”. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation, vol. 13, no. 1, Apr. 2026, pp. 25-31, doi:10.15437/jetr.1598812.
Vancouver
1.Yasin Yurt, Cansu Koltak, Özge Çiftçi, Tuğba Paksoy, Merve Paksoy. Comparison of characteristic features and quality of life in faller and non-faller transtibial prosthesis users. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2026 Apr. 1;13(1):25-31. doi:10.15437/jetr.1598812