Fiziksel aktivite seviyesi ile konstipasyon şiddeti arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi

Year 2015, Volume: 2 Issue: 2 - Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 66 - 73, 23.07.2016

Ceren Orhan Türkan Akbayrak Serap Kaya Taylan Kav Mintaze Kerem Günel

Abstract

Amaç: Türk popülasyonunda kronik konstipasyonu olan bireylerin fiziksel aktivite düzeylerini değerlendiren ve konstipasyon şiddeti ile arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen bir çalışma yoktur. Bu nedenle, bu çalışmanın amacı, fiziksel aktivite düzeyi ile konstipasyon şiddeti arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesiydi. Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya Roma III tanı kriterlerine göre kronik konstipasyon tanısı alan 79 olgu (72 kadın-7 erkek, ortalama yaş: 37.7±13.35 yıl) dahil edildi. Olguların demografik özellikleri ve detaylı tıbbi hikayeleri kaydedildi. Konstipasyon Ciddiyet Ölçeği (KCÖ) kullanılarak konstipasyon şiddeti değerlendirildi. Olguların fiziksel aktivite seviyelerini belirlemek için Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi-Kısa Form (UFAA-KF) kullanıldı. UFAA-KF’dan elde edilen veriler metabolik eşitlik (MET)xdk/hafta olarak hesaplandı. Elde edilen fiziksel aktivite puanına göre, olgular “inaktif”, “minimal aktif” ve “yeterince aktif” olarak üç gruba ayrıldı. Değişkenler arasındaki ilişkinin kuvvetinin belirlenmesi için Spearman korelasyon katsayısı kullanıldı. Bulgular: UFAA-KF’dan elde edilen fiziksel aktivite puanı ve konstipasyon şiddeti arasında negatif yönde düşük düzeyde anlamlı bir korelasyon bulundu (r=-0.32, p=0.003). Aynı zamanda, inaktif, minimal aktif ve çok aktif fiziksel aktivite seviyesi ile konstipasyon şiddeti arasında negatif yönde düşük düzeyde anlamlı bir korelasyon vardı (r=-0.29, p=0.007). Tartışma: Bu çalışma, fiziksel aktivite düzeyinin konstipasyon şiddeti ile ilişkili olduğu gösterdi. Bu nedenle, kronik konstipasyonu olanlarda fiziksel aktivite ve egzersiz programlarının tedaviye dahil edilmesi önem kazanmaktadır. Gelecekte daha büyük örneklemlerin olduğu ve daha objektif değerlendirme yöntemlerinin kullanıldığı çalışmaların planlanması gerekmektedir

Keywords

Konstipasyon, Fiziksel aktivite, Egzersiz

Relationship between severity of constipation and physical activity level

Abstract

Purpose: There is no study evaluating physical activity level in patients with chronic constipation and determining the relationship between physical activity level and severity of constipation in Turkish population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between severity of constipation and physical activity level. Methods: Seventy-nine subjects (72 females-7 males, mean age: 37.7±13.35 years) with chronic constipation based on Rome III criteria were included in this study. Demographic characteristics and detailed medical history of subjects were recorded. Severity of constipation was assessed using the Constipation Severity Instrument (CSI). The International Physical Activity Questionnaire- Short Form (IPAQ-SF) was used to determine the physical activity level of participants. Physical activity data obtained from IPAQ-SF was computed for metabolic equivalent (MET) x minutes per week. Subjects were also categorized as “inactive”, “minimally active” and “very active” according to physical activity scores. Spearman correlation coefficient was used to investigate the degree of relationship between variables. Results: A statistically significant negative low-level correlation between the physical activity score obtained between IPAQ-SF and the CSI total score (r=-0.32, p=0.003) was found. There was also a statistically significant negative low-level relationship between the physical activity class including “inactive”, “minimally active”, and “very active”, and the CSI total score (r=-0.29, p=0.007). Conclusion: According to the findings, physical activity level seems to be relevant with the severity of constipation. Therefore, adding physical activity and exercise program to the treatment in patients with chronic constipation may become important. Further study with larger sample sizes and more objective methods needs to be planned

Keywords

Constipation, Physical activity, Exercise

References

• 1. Sandler RS, Drossman DA. Bowel habits in young adults not seeking health care. Dig Dis Sci. 1987;32:841-845.
• 2. Lembo A, Camilleri M. Chronic constipation. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1360-1368.
• 3. Leung L, Riutta T, Kotecha J, et al. Chronic constipation: an evidence-based review. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24:436-451.
• 4. Uysal N, Khorshid L, Eşer İ. The identification of constipation problem in healthy young individuals. TAF Prev Med Bull. 2010;9:127- 137.
• 5. Locke GR, 3rd, Pemberton JH, Phillips SF. AGA technical review on constipation. American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1766-1778.
• 6. Suares NC, Ford AC. Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1582- 1591.
• 7. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100:126-131.
• 8. Kim HS, Park DH, Kim JW, et al. Effectiveness of walking exercise as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Am Journal Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1964-1969.
• 9. Kinnunen O. Study of constipation in a geriatric hospital, day hospital, old people's home and at home. Aging. 1991;3:161-170.
• 10. Dukas L, Willett WC, Giovannucci EL. Association between physical activity, fiber intake, and other lifestyle variables and constipation in a study of women. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1790-1796.
• 11. Everhart JE, Go VL, Johannes RS, et al. A longitudinal survey of self-reported bowel habits in the United States. Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34:1153-1162.
• 12. Meshkinpour H, Selod S, Movahedi H, et al. Effects of regular exercise in management of chronic idiopathic constipation. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:2379-2383.
• 13. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, et al. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1480-1491.
• 14. Varma MG, Wang JY, Berian JR, et al. The constipation severity instrument: a validated measure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:162-172.
• 15. Kaya N, Turan N. Konstipasyon Ciddiyet Ölçeğinin güvenilirlik ve geçerliliği. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci. 2011;31:1491-1501.
• 16. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381-1395.
• 17. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;111:278-284.
• 18. Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A, Koch TR, et al. Association of constipation with neurologic diseases. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37:179-186.
• 19. Pare P, Ferrazzi S, Thompson WG, et al. An epidemiological survey of constipation in canada: definitions, rates, demographics, and predictors of health care seeking. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:3130-3137.
• 20. Sandler RS, Jordan MC, Shelton BJ. Demographic and dietary determinants of constipation in the US population. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:185-189.
• 21. Brandt LJ, Prather CM, Quigley EM, et al. Systematic review on the management of chronic constipation in North America. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:Suppl 1:S5-S21.
• 22. Gonenne J, Esfandyari T, Camilleri M, et al. Effect of female sex hormone supplementation and withdrawal on gastrointestinal and colonic transit in postmenopausal women. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006;18:911-918.
• 23. Wald A, Van Thiel DH, Hoechstetter L, et al. Gastrointestinal transit: the effect of the menstrual cycle. Gastroenterology. 1981;80:1497-1500.
• 24. Jung HK, Kim DY, Moon IH. Effects of gender and menstrual cycle on colonic transit time in healthy subjects. Korean J Intern Med. 2003;18:181-186.
• 25. Wald A, Mueller-Lissner S, Kamm MA, et al. Survey of laxative use by adults with selfdefined constipation in South America and Asia: a comparison of six countries. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:274-284.
• 26. Higgins PD, Johanson JF. Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review. Am Journal Gastroenterol. 2004;99:750- 759.
• 27. Klauser AG, Flaschentrager J, Gehrke A, et al. Abdominal wall massage: effect on colonic function in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic constipation. Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie. 1992;30:247-251.
• 28. Donald IP, Smith RG, Cruikshank JG, et al. A study of constipation in the elderly living at home. Gerontology. 1985;31:112-118.
• 29. Martin D. Physical activity benefits and risks on the gastrointestinal system. South Med J. 2011;104:831-837.
• 30. Peters HP, De Vries WR, VanbergeHenegouwen GP, et al. Potential benefits and hazards of physical activity and exercise on the gastrointestinal tract. Gut. 2001;48:435-439.
• 31. De Schryver AM, Keulemans YC, Peters HP, et al. Effects of regular physical activity on defecation pattern in middle-aged patients complaining of chronic constipation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:422-429.
• 32. Karam SE, Nies DM. Student/staff collaboration: a pilot bowel management program. J Gerontol Nurs. 1994;20:32-40.
• 33. Sylvia LG, Bernstein EE, Hubbard JL, et al. Practical guide to measuring physical activity. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114:199-208.