Çocuk Kol Rehabilitasyon Ölçeği’nin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliği

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 142 - 151, 19.07.2022

Fatma Nur Altın , Tülay Tarsuslu Şimşek

https://doi.org/10.15437/jetr.902418

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, üst ekstremite rehabilitasyon değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan Çocuk Kol Rehabilitasyon Ölçeği’nin (ÇKRÖ) Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin belirlenmesi amaçlandı.
Yöntem: Çalışmaya, 5-16 yaş arasında, serebral palsili (SP) 69 (34 kız, 35 erkek) çocuk dahil edildi. Çocukların sosyo-demografik özellikleri ile ilgili veriler, araştırmacı tarafından oluşturulan bir form ile sorgulandı. Çocukların üst ekstremite fonksiyonları Türkçe çevirisi yapılan ÇKRÖ ile değerlendirildi. Ölçeğin geçerliğinin belirlenebilmesi için yapı geçerliliği ÇKRÖ ve Elle İlgili Yetenek Ölçeği (EİYÖ-Çocuk) arasındaki korelasyon ile değerlendirildi. Güvenilirliğin belirlenebilmesi için iç tutarlılık ve zamana göre değişmezlik incelendi. İç tutarlılığın belirlenebilmesi için Cronbach Alfa değeri, zamana göre değişmezliğin belirlenebilmesi için test-tekrar test yöntemi ile ilk değerlendirmeden 14 gün sonra değerlendirmeler tekrar yapılarak sınıf İçi korelasyon katsayısının değeri hesaplandı.

Bulgular: ÇKRÖ ve EİYÖ-Çocuk arasında mükemmel düzeyde pozitif yönde bir korelasyon olduğu belirlendi (r=0,917, p<0,001). ÇKRÖ’nün iç tutarlılığı yüksek bulundu (Cronbach Alfa=0,958). Test-tekrar test güvenilirliği ise çok yüksek (ICC=0,953) bulundu.
Sonuç: Çalışmanın sonuçları, ÇKRÖ’nün, üst ekstremite aktivite limitasyonunun değerlendirilmesinde kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğunu ortaya çıkardı.

Keywords

serebral palsi, üst ekstremite, güvenirlik, geçerlik

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Children's Arm Rehabilitation Measurement

Abstract

Purpose: This was aimed at the Turkish validity and reliability of the Children's Arm Rehabilitation Measurement (ChARM) used in the evaluation of upper extremity rehabilitation measurements.
Methods: The study included 69 (34 girls, 35 boys) children with cerebral palsy (CP) between 6-15 years of age. Children's upper limb functions was evaluated by ChARM and Manual Ability Measure (ABILHAND-Kids). The correlation between the ChARM and ABILHAND-Kids was examined to detect validity of the scale. The Cronbach’s Alpha value was calculated to detect internal consistency. To determine reliability, internal consistency and time invariance were examined. To determine time invariance, children with cerebral palsy were test-retest reliability evaluated 14 days after the first evaluation and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) value was calculated.
Results: In the statistical analysis performed, it was determined that there is an excellent positive correlation between ChARM and ABILHAND-Kids. (r=0.917, p<0.001). Internal consistency of the ChARM was determined high (Cronbach’s Alpha=0.958) and test-retest reliability was very high (ICC=0.953).
Conclusion: The results of the study revealed that ChARM is a valid and reliable scale that can be used in the evaluation of upper extremity activity limitation in children with cerebral palsy.

Keywords

cerebral palsy, upper limb, reliability, validity

References

• 1. Bax M, Goldstein M, Rosenbaum P, et al. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47:571-576.
• 2. Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A,et al. A report: the defination and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;109:8-14.
• 3. Elbasan B, Bozkurt E, Oskay D, et al. Upper Extremity Impairments and Activities in Children with Bilateral Cerebral Palsy. Iran J Pediatr, 2017;27:7711-7716
• 4. Preston N, Horton M, Levesley M, et al. Development of a parent‐reported questionnaire evaluating upper limb activity limitation in children with cerebral palsy. Physiother Res Int.2018;23:1684-169
• 5. Aneja S. Evaluation of a child with cerebral palsy. Indian J Pediatr. 2004;71:627-634.
• 6. Günel MK, Seyhan K, Delioğlu K, et al. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pediatric motor activity log-revised (PMAL-R) for 2-17 year old children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;1-8.
• 7. Hoare BJ, Wallen MA, Imms C, Villanueva E, Rawicki HB, Carey L. Botulinum toxin A as an adjunct to treatment in the management of the upper limb in children with spastic cerebral palsy (UPDATE). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 2010(1):CD003469.
• 8. Meyer-Heim A, van Hedel HJA. Robot-assisted and computer-enhanced therapies for children with cerebral palsy: current state and clinical implementation. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2013;20:139-145.
• 9. Palsbo SE, Hood‐Szivek P. Effect of robotic‐assisted three‐dimensional repetitive motion to improve hand motor function and control in children with handwriting deficits: A nonrandomized phase 2 device trial. Am J Occup Ther, 2012;66:682-690.
• 10. Qiu Q, Ramirez DA, Saleh S, Fluet GG, Parikh HD, Kelly D, et al. The New Jersey Institute of Technology Robot-Assisted Virtual Rehabilitation (NJIT-RAVR) system for children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:40-49.
• 11. Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Boyd R. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of therapeutic management of upper‐limb dysfunction in children with congenital hemiplegia. Pediatrics, 2009;123:1111-1122.
• 12. Sandlund M, Mcdonough S, Hager‐Ross C Interactive computer play in rehabilitation of children with sensorimotor disorders: A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2009;51:173-179.
• 13. Burgess A, Boyd RN, Ziviani J, Sakzewski L. A systematic review of upper limb activity measures for 5- to 18-year-old children with bilateral cerebral palsy. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66:552-567.
• 14. Gilmore R, Sakzewski L, Boyd R. Upper limb activity measures for 5‐ to 16‐year‐old children with congenital hemiplegia: A systematic review Dev Med Child Neurol, 2010;52:14-21.
• 15. Greaves S, Imms C, Dodd K, et al. Assessing bimanual performance in young children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2010;52:413-421.
• 16. Şahin E, Dilek B, Karakaş A,et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the ABILHAND-Kids Survey in children with cerebral palsy. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;66:444-451.
• 17. Vogels T, Verrips GH, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, et al. Measuring healthrelated quality of life in children: the development of the TACQOL parent form. Qual Life Res 1998;7:457-465.
• 18. Bicer A, Yazici A, Camdeviren H, et al. Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:959-962.
• 19. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al. Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Spine. 2000; 25:3186-3191.
• 20. Mohamad Adam B, Evi Diana O, Nur Akmal B. A review on sample size determination for Cronbach’s alpha test: a simple guide for researchers. Malays J Med Sci. 2018;25:85-
• 21. Arnould C, Penta M, Renders A, et al. ABILHAND-Kids A measure of manual ability in children with cerebral palsy. Neurology. 2004;63:1045-1052.
• 22. Kwolek A, Majka M, Pabis M The rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy: problems and current trends. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2001;3:499-507.
• 23. Kahraman T, Genc A, Goz E. The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation into Turkish assessing its psychometric properties. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:2153-2160.
• 24. Niemeijer AS, Reinders-Messelink HA, Disseldorp LM, et al. Feasibility, reliability, and agreement of the WeeFIM instrument in Dutch children with burns. Phys Ther. 2012;92:958-966.
• 25. Hayran M. Sağlık Araştırmaları İçin Temel İstatistik. Ankara: Omega Araştırma; 2011.
• 26. Beckung E, Hagberg G. Neuroimpairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol., 2002;44:309-316
• 27. Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP et al. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:1094-1105.
• 28. Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, et al. A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:730-735.