EN
Cognitive Self-Regulation Strategy: Mixed Method Research
Abstract
The aim of this study is to apply the Cognitive
Self-Regulation Scale developed by Fabio Alivernini, Sara Manganelli, Elisa
Cavicchiolo, Andrea Chirico, and Fabio Lucidi (2018) to Turkish language by
adapting it to Turkish culture. The study was applied to 350 students between
the ages of 12-15. As a result of reliability analyses, Cronbach's alpha
coefficient for the whole scale was found to be .72. The results of the
confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-dimensional model of the
scale was appropriate to the Turkish sample (x²=213.33, df=54, p=0.00,
RMSEA=.09, NFI=.84, NNFI=.85, CFI=.88, IFI=.88, RFI=.81, AGFI=.87, GFI=.91, and
SRMR=.15). In addition, the opinions of
teachers about cognitive self-regulation were taken in the research. When the
results obtained from the qualitative findings were examined, most of the
teachers stated that they tried to find common points in order to make
connections between the subjects they worked in different fields. They stated
that they do coding to ensure the permanence of the concepts that they see as a
key point, and that they check whether they have fully learned the subject they
are working on.
Keywords
References
- Akınoğlu, O., & Sarı, A. (2009). Self-regulated Learning: Models and Applications. M.U. Journal of Educational Sciences of Atatürk Education Faculty , 29, 139-154. Akkan, Y., Özgül, M., & Öztürk, M. (2018). Comparative Case Study for Metacognitive Self-Regulation Teaching to Secondary School Students: A Study on the Processes of Activity Design by Prospective Primary Mathematics Teachers Mehmet Journal of Akif Ersoy University Faculty of Education, 48, 54-84. Bartels, J., Jakson, S., & Ryan, J. (2010). Dispositional Approach-Avoidance Achievement Motivation and Cognitive Self-regulated Learning: The Mediation of Achievement Goals. Individual Differences Research, 8 (2), 97-110. Bond, R., Richardson, M., & Abraham, C. (2012). Psychological Correlates of University Students’ Academic Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138 (2), 353-387. Ferrier, D., Basset, H., (2018). Indirect effects of cognitive self-regulation on the relation between emotion knowledge and emotionality. EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE, 188 (7), 966-979 Hubert, B., & Florin, A. (2017). Cognitive self-regulation and social functioning among French children: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to first grade. PsyCh Journal 6, 57–75. Karakaş,N., (2009). The effects of portfolios used in the process of assessment of mathematics lesson on 5th grade students’ self regulation skills, cognitive strategy use and views, İstanbul. Manfra, Louis, (2006). The effects of speech awareness and speech instructions on young children's self -talk and cognitive self -regulation during a dimensional change counting task Manganelli, S.,Alivernini, F. & Mallia, L. (2015). The Development And Psychometric Properties of The Self Regulated Knowledge Scale University. ECPS Journel,12, 235-254. Mattern, J., Bauer, J. (2014). Does Teachers Cognitive Self-Regulation İncrease Their Occupational Well-Being? The Structure and Role of Self-Regulation in The Teaching Context. Teaching and Teacher Education 43,58-68. Matthews, J., Marulis, L., & Williford, A (2014). Gender processes in school functioning and the mediating role of cognitive self-regulation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 128-137. Perry, D., & Steck, A.,(2015). Increasing Student Engagement, Self-Efficacy, and Meta-Cognitive Self-Regulation in the High School Geometry Classroom: Do iPads Help?, Computers in the Schools, 32:122–143 Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2006. 3221385 Rasplica, Caitlin K., (2016). Examining the relationship of early literacy skills and cognitive self-regulation to kindergarten readiness of preschool students. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 10142189.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Studies on Education
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
June 29, 2020
Submission Date
January 27, 2020
Acceptance Date
May 4, 2020
Published in Issue
Year 2020 Volume: 5 Number: 1
APA
Arslan, S., & Özdemir, B. (2020). Cognitive Self-Regulation Strategy: Mixed Method Research. Journal of Family Counseling and Education, 5(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.32568/jfce.680584
AMA
1.Arslan S, Özdemir B. Cognitive Self-Regulation Strategy: Mixed Method Research. JFCE. 2020;5(1):24-34. doi:10.32568/jfce.680584
Chicago
Arslan, Serhat, and Burku Özdemir. 2020. “Cognitive Self-Regulation Strategy: Mixed Method Research”. Journal of Family Counseling and Education 5 (1): 24-34. https://doi.org/10.32568/jfce.680584.
EndNote
Arslan S, Özdemir B (June 1, 2020) Cognitive Self-Regulation Strategy: Mixed Method Research. Journal of Family Counseling and Education 5 1 24–34.
IEEE
[1]S. Arslan and B. Özdemir, “Cognitive Self-Regulation Strategy: Mixed Method Research”, JFCE, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 24–34, June 2020, doi: 10.32568/jfce.680584.
ISNAD
Arslan, Serhat - Özdemir, Burku. “Cognitive Self-Regulation Strategy: Mixed Method Research”. Journal of Family Counseling and Education 5/1 (June 1, 2020): 24-34. https://doi.org/10.32568/jfce.680584.
JAMA
1.Arslan S, Özdemir B. Cognitive Self-Regulation Strategy: Mixed Method Research. JFCE. 2020;5:24–34.
MLA
Arslan, Serhat, and Burku Özdemir. “Cognitive Self-Regulation Strategy: Mixed Method Research”. Journal of Family Counseling and Education, vol. 5, no. 1, June 2020, pp. 24-34, doi:10.32568/jfce.680584.
Vancouver
1.Serhat Arslan, Burku Özdemir. Cognitive Self-Regulation Strategy: Mixed Method Research. JFCE. 2020 Jun. 1;5(1):24-3. doi:10.32568/jfce.680584