Examination of the 2023 Education Vision Document in Terms of Teachers and School Administrators’ Views: The Case of Kahramanmaraş Province

Abstract

This study was carried out in order to determine the applicability of the 2023 Education Vision in institutions affiliated to the Ministry of National Education from the perspective of education administrators and teachers. Our research population consists of school administrators and teachers in Kahramanmaraş Province. In this study, which is made by taking samples from the universe, the case consists of 403 participants among the total participants who fill the questionnaire form completely. h data were obtained by benefiting from the attitudes and opinions of school administrators and teachers regarding the 2023 education vision. The positive and negative aspects of the system were investigated in the context of the 2023 Education Vision. The positive and negative aspects of the system were investigated in the context of the 2023 Education Vision. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that teachers and administrators were mostly aware of the objectives of the 2023 Education Vision Document but were not invited to any meeting before the vision document was announced. It was determined that factors such as gender, age, marital status, working environment and places of residence do not affect teachers' opinions about the 2023 Education Vision. On the other hand, it has been found that teachers with a high socioeconomic level have higher beliefs in Education Vision than others.

Keywords

• Education
• 2023 Education Vision
• Vision
• National Ministry of Education
• Technologies

References

1. Akkoyunlu, B. (2002). Educational technology in Turkey: Past, present and future. Educational Media International, 39(2), 165-174. DOI: 10.1080/09523980210155352
2. Akyuz, Y. (2011). Turkish Education History. Ankara: Pegem A Akademi Publications.
3. Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 1-14. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149
4. Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 1-14. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149
5. Başaran, M. (2003). The use of teaching materials in Turkish lessons by teachers in primary education 4th and 5th grades. (Master Thesis). Accessed from YOK (the council of higher education) Thesis Center database (Thesis No: 133819).
6. Coskun, S. (2001). Material/technology usage situation in primary school 4th and 5th grade social studies lesson. (Master Thesis). Accessed from YOK (the council of higher education) Thesis Center database (Thesis No: 106748).
7. Cagiltay, K., Cakiroglu J., Cagiltay N., & Cakiroglu E. (2001). Teachers' views on computer use in teaching. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 21, 19-28. Access address: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/
8. Celik, V. (1995). Educational management in theory and practice. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.

9. Dursun, F. (1999). Determination of teachers' competencies and educational needs for computer-aided teaching (Master's Thesis). Accessed from YOK (the council of higher education) Thesis Center database (Thesis No: 81711).
10. Ercetin, S. S. (2000). Vision in leader spiral. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
11. General Directorate of Education Reform (2011). Education Monitoring Report. Ankara: General Directorate of Education Reform Publications.
12. Eroldogan, A. Y. (2007). Primary Education II. Investigation of the level of using instructional technologies of branch teachers in senior schools according to some variables (Master's Thesis). Accessed from YOK (the council of higher education) Thesis Center database (Thesis No: 206407).
13. Ergun, M. (2018). The birth and development of modern education systems (Vol. 1). Ankara: Pegem A Academy Publications.
14. Erturk, A. (2019). Is the 2023 Education Vision the answer to the problems? Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 48, 321-345. DOI: 10.9779 / pauefd.537273
15. Fidan, N. K. (2008). Teachers' views on the use of equipment in primary education. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 1(1). 48-61. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/
16. Gomleksiz, M. N. (2004). Use of education technology in English classes. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2), 11. http://www.tojet.net/articles/
17. Guven, İ. (2001). The international dimension of teacher training. National Education Journal, 150, 20-27. http://dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/Milli_Egitim_Dergisi/
18. Hamarat, E., & Arkan, A. (2018). Future skills in the 2023 Education Vision Document. Seta Perspective Magazine, 222, 1-7. https://setav.org/assets/uploads/
19. Kaya, Z. (2006). Instructional technologies and material development. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
20. Kocasarac, H. (2003). Teacher qualifications regarding the use of computers in teaching. The Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology, 2(3), 1-9. http://www.tojet.net/articles/
21. Collective (1991). Contemporary developments in educational sciences. Eskisehir: Open Education Faculty Publications.
22. Ozhelvacı, H. (2003). Levels of teachers working in the districts of Sakarya province using educational technologies (Master's Thesis). Accessed from YOK (the council of higher education) Thesis Center database (Thesis No: 136927).
23. Senge, P. M. (1993). Fifth Discipline (A. Ildeniz and A. Dogukan, Trans.). Istanbul: Yapi Kredi Publications. (Original work published in 1990).
24. Ozpinar, İ., & Arslan, S. (2008). Teacher qualifications: The expectations of primary education programs and the gains of education faculties. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Science and Mathematics Journal, 1(1), 38-63. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/
25. Sahin, M. (2000). Problems faced by classroom teachers while performing activities related to educational technologies and applications in the teaching process. (Master Thesis. Accessed from YOK (the council of higher education) Thesis Center database (Thesis No: 102171).
26. Sisman, M. (2002). Instructional leadership. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
27. Turkish Language Association (t.y.). Turkish Dictionary. Accessed on 02.12.2020 from https://sozluk.gov.tr/).
28. Ucar, M. (1998). Evaluation of teachers' views on the use of course materials in primary education (Master's Thesis). Accessed from YOK (the council of higher education) Thesis Center database (Thesis No: 64834)
29. Usun, S. (2006). Instructional technologies and material design. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
30. Weis, A. H., Mandich, M., Seidenberg, I., Odom, R. D., Conn, C., Pfeiffer, E., ... & Spoon, A. G. (1999). Professional development: A link to better learning. School, Technology and Readiness Report.
31. Yilmaz, M. (2007). Technology education in training classroom teachers. Gazi Faculty of Education Journal, 27(1), 155–167. http://www.gefad.gazi.edu.tr/tr/