EN
TR
Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers
Abstract
This study was carried out to determine comparability of tearing resistance measured by dynamic and static testing devices. Tearing indices of double tear samples from different commercial paper grades were determined dynamically by using pendulum type Marx-Maller Elmendorf device and statically by using Zwick/Roell universal tensile testing device. Tear resistance values for dynamic and static tests were compared and good correlation was observed (R²-0.96 and 0.99 for MD and CD respectively). Tear index ratios (cross direction / machine direction) of the two methods was found to be relatively close for all paper grades. Force required for initiation of static tearing at machine direction was bigger than at cross direction and variate from 1 to 7 N for different paper grades.
Keywords
References
- Lyne, M.B., M. Jackson and A.E. Ranger, 1972. The in-plane, Elmendorf, and edge tear strength properties of mixed furnish papers. Tappi Journal. 55 (6): 924-932.
- Seth, R.S. and K.M. Blinco, 1990. Comparison of Brecht-Imset and Elmendorf tear strengths. Tappi Journal. 73 (1): 139-142.
- Witkowska, B. and I. Frydrych, 2004. A analysis Comparative methods. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe. 12 (2): 42-47. of tear strength
- Yamauchi, T. and A. Tanaka, 2002. Tearing test for paper using a tensile tester. Journal of Wood Science. 48 (6): 532-535.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
September 5, 2010
Submission Date
January 23, 2012
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2010 Volume: 60 Number: 2
APA
Atik, C., & Engin, M. (2010). Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 60(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.61970
AMA
1.Atik C, Engin M. Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers. J FAC FOR ISTANBUL U. 2010;60(2):1-5. doi:10.17099/jffiu.61970
Chicago
Atik, Celil, and Merve Engin. 2010. “Comparison of Dynamic and Static Tearing Resistance of Different Commercial Papers”. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 60 (2): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.61970.
EndNote
Atik C, Engin M (July 1, 2010) Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 60 2 1–5.
IEEE
[1]C. Atik and M. Engin, “Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers”, J FAC FOR ISTANBUL U, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 1–5, July 2010, doi: 10.17099/jffiu.61970.
ISNAD
Atik, Celil - Engin, Merve. “Comparison of Dynamic and Static Tearing Resistance of Different Commercial Papers”. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 60/2 (July 1, 2010): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.61970.
JAMA
1.Atik C, Engin M. Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers. J FAC FOR ISTANBUL U. 2010;60:1–5.
MLA
Atik, Celil, and Merve Engin. “Comparison of Dynamic and Static Tearing Resistance of Different Commercial Papers”. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, vol. 60, no. 2, July 2010, pp. 1-5, doi:10.17099/jffiu.61970.
Vancouver
1.Celil Atik, Merve Engin. Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers. J FAC FOR ISTANBUL U. 2010 Jul. 1;60(2):1-5. doi:10.17099/jffiu.61970