BibTex RIS Cite

Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers

Year 2010, Volume: 60 Issue: 2, 1 - 5, 05.09.2010

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine comparability of tearing resistance measured by dynamic and static testing devices. Tearing indices of double tear samples from different commercial paper grades were determined dynamically by using pendulum type Marx-Maller Elmendorf device and statically by using Zwick/Roell universal tensile testing device. Tear resistance values for dynamic and static tests were compared and good correlation was observed (R²-0.96 and 0.99 for MD and CD respectively). Tear index ratios (cross direction / machine direction) of the two methods was found to be relatively close for all paper grades. Force required for initiation of static tearing at machine direction was bigger than at cross direction and variate from 1 to 7 N for different paper grades.

References

  • Lyne, M.B., M. Jackson and A.E. Ranger, 1972. The in-plane, Elmendorf, and edge tear strength properties of mixed furnish papers. Tappi Journal. 55 (6): 924-932.
  • Seth, R.S. and K.M. Blinco, 1990. Comparison of Brecht-Imset and Elmendorf tear strengths. Tappi Journal. 73 (1): 139-142.
  • Witkowska, B. and I. Frydrych, 2004. A analysis Comparative methods. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe. 12 (2): 42-47. of tear strength
  • Yamauchi, T. and A. Tanaka, 2002. Tearing test for paper using a tensile tester. Journal of Wood Science. 48 (6): 532-535.

Farklı Ticari Kâğıtların Statik ve Dinamik Yırtılma Dirençlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Year 2010, Volume: 60 Issue: 2, 1 - 5, 05.09.2010

Abstract

Bu çalışma dinamik ve static test cihazlarının yırtılma direnci sonuçlarının karşılaştırılabilirliğini
belirlemek için yapılmıştır. Farklı ticari kâğıt cinslerinin çift yırtılmalı örneklerde dirençler dinamik
olarak sarkaç tipli Marx-Maller Elmendorf cihazı ile static olarak Zwick/Roell üniversal çekme testi
cihazı ile belirlenmiştir. Dinamik ve static test cihazları ile elde edilen sonuçlar karşılaştırılmış ve
aralarında iyi bir korelâsyon olduğu belirlenmiştir (R2- 0,96 MD ve R2- 0,99 ED). Yırtılma indisi oranları
(enine doğrultu / boyuna doğrultu) birbirine nispeten yakın bulunmuştur. Boyuna doğrultuda yırtılmayı
başlatmak için gerekli olan kuvvet enine doğrultuya kıyasla daha yüksek olmuştur ve farklı kağıt türleri
için 1 ila 7 N arasında değişim göstermektedir.

References

  • Lyne, M.B., M. Jackson and A.E. Ranger, 1972. The in-plane, Elmendorf, and edge tear strength properties of mixed furnish papers. Tappi Journal. 55 (6): 924-932.
  • Seth, R.S. and K.M. Blinco, 1990. Comparison of Brecht-Imset and Elmendorf tear strengths. Tappi Journal. 73 (1): 139-142.
  • Witkowska, B. and I. Frydrych, 2004. A analysis Comparative methods. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe. 12 (2): 42-47. of tear strength
  • Yamauchi, T. and A. Tanaka, 2002. Tearing test for paper using a tensile tester. Journal of Wood Science. 48 (6): 532-535.
There are 4 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Review (Derleme Makale)
Authors

Celil Atik

Merve Engin This is me

Publication Date September 5, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 60 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Atik, C., & Engin, M. (2010). Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 60(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.61970
AMA Atik C, Engin M. Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers. J FAC FOR ISTANBUL U. July 2010;60(2):1-5. doi:10.17099/jffiu.61970
Chicago Atik, Celil, and Merve Engin. “Comparison of Dynamic and Static Tearing Resistance of Different Commercial Papers”. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 60, no. 2 (July 2010): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.61970.
EndNote Atik C, Engin M (July 1, 2010) Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 60 2 1–5.
IEEE C. Atik and M. Engin, “Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers”, J FAC FOR ISTANBUL U, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2010, doi: 10.17099/jffiu.61970.
ISNAD Atik, Celil - Engin, Merve. “Comparison of Dynamic and Static Tearing Resistance of Different Commercial Papers”. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 60/2 (July 2010), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.61970.
JAMA Atik C, Engin M. Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers. J FAC FOR ISTANBUL U. 2010;60:1–5.
MLA Atik, Celil and Merve Engin. “Comparison of Dynamic and Static Tearing Resistance of Different Commercial Papers”. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, vol. 60, no. 2, 2010, pp. 1-5, doi:10.17099/jffiu.61970.
Vancouver Atik C, Engin M. Comparison of dynamic and static tearing resistance of different commercial papers. J FAC FOR ISTANBUL U. 2010;60(2):1-5.