BibTex RIS Cite

Forest ownership in comparative law

Year 2015, Volume: 65 Issue: 2, 46 - 58, 01.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.48163

Abstract

Karşılaştırmalı hukukta orman mülkiyeti

Özet: Orman kaynaklarının sürdürülebilirliği ve etkin kullanımı birçok faktöre bağlıdır. Bununla birlikte, orman mülkiyeti bu faktörler arasında üzerinde en çok durulan ve tartışılan konu başlıklarından birisidir. Karşılaştırmalı hukuk ise farklı ulusların hukuk düzenlerini analiz etme, anlama ve mevcut hukuk sistemine ile ayrıştığı yönleri belirleyebilmek adına önemli bir araçtır. Bu çalışma ile orman mülkiyeti, karşılaştırmalı hukuk temelinde incelenmektedir. İncelemede, Kara Avrupası hukuk sistemini temsilen Fransa, Anglo-Sakson hukuk sistemini temsilen Büyük Britanya ve Sosyalist hukuk sistemini temsilen Rusya Federasyonu esas alınmıştır. Yapılan inceleme sonucunda Kara Avrupası ve Anglo-Sakson hukuk siteminde özel orman mülkiyetinin yaygın olduğu, buna karşın Sosyalist Hukuk sisteminde ise Devlet mülkiyetinin daha yaygın olduğu görülmektedir. Kara Avrupası ve Anglo-Sakson hukuk siteminde özel orman mülkiyetinin daha yaygın olması, mülkiyet hakkına dönüşen ve geçmişten gelen kullanım hakları ile yakından alakalıdır. Buna ek olarak, tarihi süreç göz önüne alındığında hukuk sistemi farkı gözetmeksizin orman mülkiyet türlerinde birçok değişim yaşandığı da anlaşılmaktadır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler: Kanun, hak, Fransa, Büyük Britanya, Rusya Federasyonu


Forest ownership in comparative law

Abstract: Efficient and sustainable use of forest resources depend on various factors. However, one of the most emphasized and discussed topics among these factors is forest ownership. Comparative law is an important way of analyzing and understanding legal systems of different countries, and identifying different aspects of the current legal systems. This study tries to analyze forest ownership with regard to comparative law. France for the Continental-European legal system, Great Britain for the Anglo-Saxon legal system, and Russia Federation for the Socialist legal system are taken respectively as a base. Thus, how right to ownership is evaluated in different legal systems and what are the main features of that are indicated. As a result, private forest ownership is common in the Continental-European legal system and Anglo-Saxon legal system while state ownership is common in the Socialist legal system. Prevalence of private forest ownership in the Continental-European and the Anglo-Saxon legal systems is also closely related to the previous use rights transferred into right to ownership. In addition, it is concluded regarding the historical process that many changes occurred on forest ownership types without considering differences in legal systems.

Keywords: Law, right, France, Great Britain, Russia Federation

 

Received: 05 December 2014  - Revised: 09 January 2015  - Accepted: 09 January 2015

 

To cite this article: Birben, Ü., Güneş, Y., 2015. Karşılaştırmalı hukukta orman mülkiyeti. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 65(2): 46-58. DOI: 10.17099/jffiu.48163

References

  • Anonim, 2011a. Key dates in Crown Estate history, http://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/history_of_the_crown_estate__key_dates.pdf (Ziyaret Tarihi: 06 Haziran 2011).
  • Anonim, 2011b. Public forests, http://agriculture.gouv.fr/public-forests(Ziyaret Tarihi: 17 Haziran 2011).
  • Becker, L.W., 1977. Property Rights: Philosophic Foundations, Routhledge and Kegan Paul Ltd. pp131. ISBN: 0-71008679-2.
  • Bennett, O., 2011. The Forestry Commission And The Sale Of Public Forests In England, Standard note SN05734, pp. 15, http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN05734(Ziyaret Tarihi: 06 Haziran 2011).
  • DEFRA. 2011. The future of the Public Forest Estate in England, pp 63. UK.http://archive.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/forests/20110127-forestry-consult-doc.pdf (Ziyaret Tarihi: 06 Haziran 2011).
  • EUROFOR, 1994. Europe and The Forest, Publisher: European Parliament, ISBN 92-823-06232,Luxembourg,http://www.europarl.europa.eu/workingpapers/agri/france-3_fr.htm(Ziyaret Tarihi: 16 Haziran 2011)
  • FAO, 2009. Towards Voluntary Guidelines On Responsible Governance Of Tenure Of Land And Other Natural Resources, Discussion Paper, Land Tenure Working Paper 10, pp 29. Roma.
  • FC, 2001. Inventory Report: National Inventory of Woodland and Trees England, Edinburgh, UK, ISBN 0 85538 541.
  • FC, 2004. The Uk Forestry Standard, The Government’s Approach to Sustainable Forestry, pp.73, UK, ISBN 0-85538626-6.
  • FC, 2011a. National Forest Inventory Woodland Area Statistics: Great Britain, First Release, pp. 18, UK.
  • FC, 2011b. National Forest Inventory Woodland Area Statistics: England, First Release, pp. 19, UK.
  • FPF, 2009. Private Forest Property in France Keyfigures 2008-2009, pp. 24, France.
  • FRA, 2010b. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010, Country Report, Russia Federation, pp. 52, Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  • Güneş, Y., 2001. Orman Suçlarının Ceza Hukuku Açısından İncelenmesi, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi.
  • Hancock, B., 1998. Trent Focus for Research and Development in Primary Health Care: An Introduction to Qualitative Research, http://faculty.uccb.ns.ca/pmacintyre/course_pages/ MBA603/MBA603_files/IntroQualitativeResearch.pdf (Ziyaret Tarihi: 20.07.2011).
  • Hanna, S., Folke, C., Mäler K.G., 1996, Rights To Nature: Ecological, Economic, Cultural, And Political Principles Of Institutions For The Environment, Island Press; 1 edition, pp. 313, USA, ISBN 978-1559634908.
  • HMG, 2009. Operational Efficiency Programme: Asset Portfolio, pp. 92, Produced by HM Treasury Publishing Unit, ISBN 978-1-84532-663-0, UK.
  • IFN, 2006, Indicators For The Sustainable Management of French Forests, 2005 Edition, pp. 136, France.
  • IFN, 2008. The French Forest Figures and Maps, Edited by Institut pour le développement forestier, pp. 25, Paris.
  • Lawrence, A., Dandy, N., Urquhart, J., 2010. Report: Landowners’ attitudes to woodland creation and management in the UK, A review of current evidence, pp.66, UK.
  • Lesniewska, F., Laletin, A., Lebedev, A., Harris, K., 2008. Transition In The Taiga The Russian Forest Code 2006 And Its Implementation Process, pp. 38, Published by Taiga Rescue Network and FERN, Finland.
  • MAF, 1997. Sustainable Forest Management in France, National Plan For The Implementation of Statement of Forest Prenciples Adopted by UNCED, pp 72. France.
  • Pappila, M., 1999. The Russian Forest Sector and Legislation in Transition, Interim Report IR-99-058, pp. 33, Published by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria.
  • Robinson, L.R., 1922. Forestry in the Empire, Journal of the Empire Forestry Association, 1:11-35.
  • ROSLESHOZ, 2011. Area of forest plots, leased by type of forest management on 01.07.2009. Data publication date: 16:19, 28.08.2009 http://www.rosleshoz.gov.ru/activity/use/stat/5[Ziyaret Tarihi: 16 Haziran 2011].
  • Saussay, C.D., 1987. Land Tenure Systems And Forest Policy, Rome, ISBN 92-5-102511-8.
  • Taylor, F.C., 1898. The Land Question From Various Points Of View. A Study In Search Of The Highest Truth And Best Policy, And Not A Propaganda Print, pp. 231, USA.
  • TRN, 2007. Comments On The New Russian Forest Code, Taiga Rescue Network Briefing Note, pp. 3. Sweden.
  • Veijola, P., 2003. Commercialization Of The State Forest Management In Finland And Possible Options For Development In Russia, Institutional Changes in Forest Management in Countries with Transition Economies: Problems and Solutions, Workshop Proceedings, pp. 130, Russia

Karşılaştırmalı hukukta orman mülkiyeti

Year 2015, Volume: 65 Issue: 2, 46 - 58, 01.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.48163

Abstract

Orman kaynaklarının sürdürülebilirliği ve etkin kullanımı birçok faktöre bağlıdır. Bununla birlikte, orman mülkiyeti bu faktörler arasında üzerinde en çok durulan ve tartışılan konu başlıklarından birisidir. Karşılaştırmalı hukuk ise farklı ulusların hukuk düzenlerini analiz etme, anlama ve mevcut hukuk sistemine ile ayrıştığı yönleri belirleyebilmek adına önemli bir araçtır. Bu çalışma ile orman mülkiyeti, karşılaştırmalı hukuk temelinde incelenmektedir. İncelemede, Kara Avrupası hukuk sistemini temsilen Fransa, Anglo-Sakson hukuk sistemini temsilen Büyük Britanya ve Sosyalist hukuk sistemini temsilen Rusya Federasyonu esas alınmıştır. Yapılan inceleme sonucunda Kara Avrupası ve Anglo-Sakson hukuk siteminde özel orman mülkiyetinin yaygın olduğu, buna karşın Sosyalist Hukuk sisteminde ise Devlet mülkiyetinin daha yaygın olduğu görülmektedir. Kara Avrupası ve Anglo-Sakson hukuk siteminde özel orman mülkiyetinin daha yaygın olması, mülkiyet hakkına dönüşen ve geçmişten gelen kullanım hakları ile yakından alakalıdır. Buna ek olarak, tarihi süreç göz önüne alındığında hukuk sistemi farkı gözetmeksizin orman mülkiyet türlerinde birçok değişim yaşandığı da anlaşılmaktadır.

References

  • Anonim, 2011a. Key dates in Crown Estate history, http://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/history_of_the_crown_estate__key_dates.pdf (Ziyaret Tarihi: 06 Haziran 2011).
  • Anonim, 2011b. Public forests, http://agriculture.gouv.fr/public-forests(Ziyaret Tarihi: 17 Haziran 2011).
  • Becker, L.W., 1977. Property Rights: Philosophic Foundations, Routhledge and Kegan Paul Ltd. pp131. ISBN: 0-71008679-2.
  • Bennett, O., 2011. The Forestry Commission And The Sale Of Public Forests In England, Standard note SN05734, pp. 15, http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN05734(Ziyaret Tarihi: 06 Haziran 2011).
  • DEFRA. 2011. The future of the Public Forest Estate in England, pp 63. UK.http://archive.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/forests/20110127-forestry-consult-doc.pdf (Ziyaret Tarihi: 06 Haziran 2011).
  • EUROFOR, 1994. Europe and The Forest, Publisher: European Parliament, ISBN 92-823-06232,Luxembourg,http://www.europarl.europa.eu/workingpapers/agri/france-3_fr.htm(Ziyaret Tarihi: 16 Haziran 2011)
  • FAO, 2009. Towards Voluntary Guidelines On Responsible Governance Of Tenure Of Land And Other Natural Resources, Discussion Paper, Land Tenure Working Paper 10, pp 29. Roma.
  • FC, 2001. Inventory Report: National Inventory of Woodland and Trees England, Edinburgh, UK, ISBN 0 85538 541.
  • FC, 2004. The Uk Forestry Standard, The Government’s Approach to Sustainable Forestry, pp.73, UK, ISBN 0-85538626-6.
  • FC, 2011a. National Forest Inventory Woodland Area Statistics: Great Britain, First Release, pp. 18, UK.
  • FC, 2011b. National Forest Inventory Woodland Area Statistics: England, First Release, pp. 19, UK.
  • FPF, 2009. Private Forest Property in France Keyfigures 2008-2009, pp. 24, France.
  • FRA, 2010b. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010, Country Report, Russia Federation, pp. 52, Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  • Güneş, Y., 2001. Orman Suçlarının Ceza Hukuku Açısından İncelenmesi, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi.
  • Hancock, B., 1998. Trent Focus for Research and Development in Primary Health Care: An Introduction to Qualitative Research, http://faculty.uccb.ns.ca/pmacintyre/course_pages/ MBA603/MBA603_files/IntroQualitativeResearch.pdf (Ziyaret Tarihi: 20.07.2011).
  • Hanna, S., Folke, C., Mäler K.G., 1996, Rights To Nature: Ecological, Economic, Cultural, And Political Principles Of Institutions For The Environment, Island Press; 1 edition, pp. 313, USA, ISBN 978-1559634908.
  • HMG, 2009. Operational Efficiency Programme: Asset Portfolio, pp. 92, Produced by HM Treasury Publishing Unit, ISBN 978-1-84532-663-0, UK.
  • IFN, 2006, Indicators For The Sustainable Management of French Forests, 2005 Edition, pp. 136, France.
  • IFN, 2008. The French Forest Figures and Maps, Edited by Institut pour le développement forestier, pp. 25, Paris.
  • Lawrence, A., Dandy, N., Urquhart, J., 2010. Report: Landowners’ attitudes to woodland creation and management in the UK, A review of current evidence, pp.66, UK.
  • Lesniewska, F., Laletin, A., Lebedev, A., Harris, K., 2008. Transition In The Taiga The Russian Forest Code 2006 And Its Implementation Process, pp. 38, Published by Taiga Rescue Network and FERN, Finland.
  • MAF, 1997. Sustainable Forest Management in France, National Plan For The Implementation of Statement of Forest Prenciples Adopted by UNCED, pp 72. France.
  • Pappila, M., 1999. The Russian Forest Sector and Legislation in Transition, Interim Report IR-99-058, pp. 33, Published by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria.
  • Robinson, L.R., 1922. Forestry in the Empire, Journal of the Empire Forestry Association, 1:11-35.
  • ROSLESHOZ, 2011. Area of forest plots, leased by type of forest management on 01.07.2009. Data publication date: 16:19, 28.08.2009 http://www.rosleshoz.gov.ru/activity/use/stat/5[Ziyaret Tarihi: 16 Haziran 2011].
  • Saussay, C.D., 1987. Land Tenure Systems And Forest Policy, Rome, ISBN 92-5-102511-8.
  • Taylor, F.C., 1898. The Land Question From Various Points Of View. A Study In Search Of The Highest Truth And Best Policy, And Not A Propaganda Print, pp. 231, USA.
  • TRN, 2007. Comments On The New Russian Forest Code, Taiga Rescue Network Briefing Note, pp. 3. Sweden.
  • Veijola, P., 2003. Commercialization Of The State Forest Management In Finland And Possible Options For Development In Russia, Institutional Changes in Forest Management in Countries with Transition Economies: Problems and Solutions, Workshop Proceedings, pp. 130, Russia
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles (Araştırma Makalesi)
Authors

Üstüner Birben

Yusuf Güneş This is me

Publication Date July 1, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 65 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Birben, Ü., & Güneş, Y. (2015). Karşılaştırmalı hukukta orman mülkiyeti. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 65(2), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.48163
AMA Birben Ü, Güneş Y. Karşılaştırmalı hukukta orman mülkiyeti. J FAC FOR ISTANBUL U. February 2015;65(2):46-58. doi:10.17099/jffiu.48163
Chicago Birben, Üstüner, and Yusuf Güneş. “Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Orman mülkiyeti”. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 65, no. 2 (February 2015): 46-58. https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.48163.
EndNote Birben Ü, Güneş Y (February 1, 2015) Karşılaştırmalı hukukta orman mülkiyeti. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 65 2 46–58.
IEEE Ü. Birben and Y. Güneş, “Karşılaştırmalı hukukta orman mülkiyeti”, J FAC FOR ISTANBUL U, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 46–58, 2015, doi: 10.17099/jffiu.48163.
ISNAD Birben, Üstüner - Güneş, Yusuf. “Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Orman mülkiyeti”. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 65/2 (February 2015), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.48163.
JAMA Birben Ü, Güneş Y. Karşılaştırmalı hukukta orman mülkiyeti. J FAC FOR ISTANBUL U. 2015;65:46–58.
MLA Birben, Üstüner and Yusuf Güneş. “Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Orman mülkiyeti”. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, vol. 65, no. 2, 2015, pp. 46-58, doi:10.17099/jffiu.48163.
Vancouver Birben Ü, Güneş Y. Karşılaştırmalı hukukta orman mülkiyeti. J FAC FOR ISTANBUL U. 2015;65(2):46-58.