The protective role of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid use and relation with inflammatory and thrombotic parameters on radial artery occlusion in patients undergoing elective transradial coronary angiography

Year 2022, , 1103 - 1109, 20.07.2022

Nail Burak Özbeyaz , Sadık Açıkel , Engin Algul , Haluk Furkan Şahan , Faruk Aydınyılmaz , Mehmet Ali Felekoğlu , Gökhan Gökalp , İlkin Gulıyev

https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1110150

Abstract

Aim: Transradial angiography (TRA) is recommended in clinical practice; it is better than the transfemoral route to prevent site-related complications. Radial artery occlusion is one of the most seen significant complications after TRA. In the present study, the protective effect of low dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) use against the radial artery occlusion (RAO) and the predictive ability of some thrombotic and inflammatory factors for the development of RAO were investigated.
Material and Method: One thousand two hundred fifty-four patients who planned for elective coronary angiography were screened to include transradial coronary angiography. The patients have grouped group I, who took ASA (100 mg) (n= 56), and group II (n= 51), who did not. Blood samples were taken immediately after sheath insertion and after the six hours of the sheath removal. The D-dimer and C-reactive protein values were analyzed between groups. In the first 24 hours after the procedure, the radial Doppler ultrasonography assessment was performed to detect RAO. Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent risk factors for the TRA.
Results: Eligible one hundred seven stable patients were included in the study. The demographic, laboratory and procedural characteristics were similar between the two groups (Table 2). TRA was statistically lower in Group I compared to Group II. (n=3 vs. n=22, p=.001). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that postprocedural higher D-dimer levels and non-ASA status were found to be the independent risk factors for RAO (OR (95% CI=1.235(1.014-1.582) p=.001, 5.534 (3.376-9.252), p <.001). ROC analysis demonstrated the cut-off value of the D-dimer level was 144 ng/ml for predicting RAO (AUC =0.658, sensitivity 62.4%, specificity 89.2%, p=.016). Preprocedural and postprocedural CRP values did not differ between groups (p>.05).
Conclusion: Preprocedural ASA use may have a protective role against the RAO. Pre- and post-procedural D-dimer levels can predict the thrombotic process in the early phase of the RAO.

Keywords

Acetylsalicylic acid, radial artery occlusion, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, protection

References

• Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 132-40.
• Pancholy SB, Bernat I, Bertrand OF, et al. Prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization: the PROPHET-II randomized trial. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2016; 9: 1992-1999.
• Bernat I, Horak D, Stasek J, et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 964-72.
• Kotowycz MA and Džavík V. Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions 2012; 5: 127-33.
• Bernat I, Bertrand OF, Rokyta R, et al. Efficacy and safety of transient ulnar artery compression to recanalize acute radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 1698-701.
• Cubero JM, Lombardo J, Pedrosa C, et al. Radial compression guided by mean artery pressure versus standard compression with a pneumatic device (RACOMAP). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 73: 467-72.
• Hahalis GN, Leopoulou M, Tsigkas G, et al. Multicenter randomized evaluation of high versus standard heparin dose on incident radial arterial occlusion after transradial coronary angiography: the SPIRIT OF ARTEMIS study. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2018; 11: 2241-50.
• Weitz JI, Fredenburgh JC and Eikelboom JW. A test in context: d-dimer. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70: 2411-20.
• Ferguson JJ. Clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytic therapy--CLARITY-TIMI 28. Future Cardiol 2005; 1: 605-610. 2005/09/01. DOI: 10.2217/14796678.1.5.605.
• Becattini C, Agnelli G, Schenone A, et al. Aspirin for preventing the recurrence of venous thromboembolism. New Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1959-67.
• Johnston SC, Easton JD, Farrant M, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin in acute ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA. New Engl J Med 2018; 379: 215-25.
• Petroglou D, Didagelos M, Alkagiet S, et al. Manual radial artery compression after transradial coronary procedures: is it safe to go bare-handed? Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2020; 21: 912-6.
• Folsom AR, Gottesman RF, Appiah D, et al. Plasma d-dimer and incident ischemic stroke and coronary heart disease: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Stroke 2016; 47: 18-23.
• Parolari A, Cavallotti L, Andreini D, et al. D-dimer is associated with arterial and venous coronary artery bypass graft occlusion. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2018; 155: 200-7. e203.
• Kleinegris MC, ten Cate H and ten Cate-Hoek AJ. D-dimer as a marker for cardiovascular and arterial thrombotic events in patients with peripheral arterial disease. A systematic review. Thromb Haemost 2013; 110: 233-43.
• Hynes KM, Gau GT, Rutherford BD, et al. Effect of aspirin on brachial artery occlusion following brachial arteriotomy for coronary arteriography. Circulation 1973; 47: 554-7.
• Schade DS, Burchiel S and Eaton RP. A Pathophysiologic primary prevention review of aspirin administration to prevent cardiovascular thrombosis. Endocr Pract 2020; 26: 787-93.
• Snyder MA, Sympson AN, Scheuerman CM, et al. Efficacy in deep vein thrombosis prevention with extended mechanical compression device therapy and prophylactic aspirin following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized control trial. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 1478-82.
• Würtz M, Kristensen SD, Hvas AM, et al. Pharmacogenetics of the antiplatelet effect of aspirin. Curr Pharm Des 2012; 18: 5294-308.
• Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 1409-20.
• Le May M, Wells G, So D, et al. Safety and efficacy of femoral access vs radial access in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: The SAFARI-STEMI randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol 2020; 5: 126-34.
• Shah R and Khan B. The MATRIX trial. Lancet 2019; 393: 1803.
• Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 2481-9.
• Hahalis G, Aznaouridis K, Tsigkas G, et al. radial artery and ulnar artery occlusions following coronary procedures and the impact of anticoagulation: ARTEMIS (Radial and Ulnar ARTEry Occlusion Meta-AnalysIS) systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6: e005430.
• Besli F, Gungoren F, Tanriverdi Z, et al. The high dose unfractionated heparin is related to less radial artery occlusion rates after diagnostic cardiac catheterisation: a single centre experience. Acta Cardiol 2021; 76: 168-174.
• Fernandez RS and Lee A. Effects of methods used to achieve hemostasis on radial artery occlusion following percutaneous coronary procedures: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2016; 14: 25-31.
• Petroglou D, Didagelos M, Chalikias G, et al. Manual versus mechanical compression of the radial artery after transradial coronary angiography: The MEMORY multicenter randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11: 1050-8.
• Fernandez RS and Lee A. Effects of methods used to achieve hemostasis on radial artery occlusion following percutaneous coronary procedures: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2017; 15: 738-64.
• Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2465-76.
• Jeong HC, Ahn Y, Hong YJ, et al. Statin therapy to reduce stent thrombosis in acute myocardial infarction patients with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167: 1848-53.
• Oesterle A and Liao JK. The pleiotropic effects of statins - from coronary artery disease and stroke to atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2019; 17: 222-