Aim: Patients with special needs, who have mental, physical or medical disabilities, were reported to have worse oral hygiene than their healthy peers. Disabled patients are usually uncooperated, and dental treatments of these patients are completed under several anesthesia types. Our aim was to compare anesthesia types in dental treatments of patients with special needs.
Material and Method: The study included review of uncooperated patients, who had physical or mental disabilities, between June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2022. Patients were divided into three groups due to their anesthesia types; sedation (Group S), laryngeal mask airway (LMA) (Group L), and nasotracheal intubation (Group N).
Results: In total 80 patients were analyzed; 4 patients excluded, 45 patients were in Group S, 19 patients were in Group L, and 12 patients were in Group N. Anesthesia times were significantly different between groups; 20 min in Group S, 25 min in Group L, and 45 min in Group N. Propofol use was significantly low (p<0.001) and ketamine use was significantly high in Group S (p=0.002). Number of tooth extractions was not significantly different between groups, but number of filling tooth was significantly high in Group N (p=0.002).
Conclusion: Sedation was the most preferred anesthesia type in dental treatment of patients with special needs. Although all three types of anesthesia can be used safely in dental treatments, we suggest that sedation can be considered as the first choice in tooth extraction in patients deemed appropriate by the anesthesiologist and dentist.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Health Care Administration |
Journal Section | Original Article |
Authors | |
Publication Date | October 25, 2022 |
Published in Issue | Year 2022 |
Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği: Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]
Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.
Not: Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.
Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show
Dergi Dizin ve Platformları
Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.
Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.