Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 5, 1259 - 1266, 25.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1117561

Abstract

References

  • Charley Kline Sends the First Message Over the ARPANET from Leonard Kleinrock's Computer : History of Information [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?entryid=1108
  • The Evolution of Social Media: How Did It Begin and Where Could It Go Next? [Internet]. Maryville Online 2020 [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://online.maryville.edu/blog/evolution-social-media/
  • Lawal N. Top Five Academic Social Networking Sites for Scholars and Students [Internet]. Medium 2017 [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://medium.com/@NurdinLawal/top-five-academic-social-networking-sites-for-scholars-and-students-5b146e674f84
  • Doktorların Sosyal ve Akademik Sosyal Medya Kullanımı, Sosyal Medya Yardımı ile Hastalarıyla İletişim Kurması [İnternet]. Google Docs. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSePohU0bYNTpscHlyGTlarY8kf6ixPpOjzvXF51tSrNuRax5w/viewform?usp=send_form&usp=embed_facebook
  • Sağlık Bakanlığı TC. Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2019 Yayınlanmıştır [Internet]. T.C. Saglik Bakanligi. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR,84966/saglik-istatistikleri-yilligi-2019-yayinlanmistir.html
  • DIGITAL 2022: Another Year Of Bumper Growth [Internet]. We Are Social UK 2022 [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2022/01/digital-2022-another-year-of-bumper-growth-2/
  • Güler ÖGE. Akademik Personelin Akademik Sosyal Ağları Kullanim Düzeyi: Anadolu Üniversitesi 2013; 6.
  • Imran MK, Iqbal SMJ, Aslam U, Fatima T. Does social media promote knowledge exchange? A qualitative insight. Manag Decis 2019; 57: 688–702.
  • Brown J, Ryan C, Harris A. How Doctors View and Use Social Media: A National Survey. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e267.
  • von Muhlen M, Ohno-Machado L. Reviewing social media use by clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19: 777–81.
  • The Platform Doctors Trust for Online Video Education. VuMedi [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://www.vumedi.com/
  • Meishar-Tal H, Pieterse E. Why do academics use academic social networking sites? Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn [Internet] 2017; 18. Available from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2643

Examining social media and academic social network use, and trends in physician-patient communication via social media: a national study

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 5, 1259 - 1266, 25.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1117561

Abstract

Introduction: In the history of the internet, social media occupy an exceptional place because they bring about sociological changes and cause things that will influence the course of history. It has become inevitable to conduct a study that examines the changes in the relationship between academic social networks and online patient-physician relationships, which have become widespread in recent years, especially among physicians. This study attempted to address this deficiency.
Material and Method: An online survey was created on Google Forms that included questions about physicians' use of social and academic media networks and their communication habits with online patients. Age, gender, medical specialty and workplace, social media use, academic social networks usage, and relationships with patients via social media were analyzed.
Results: Daily social media usage was significantly associated with age and medical specialty. Participants aged 40-50 and Basic Medic Science Consultants were least likely to use social media. The use of Facebook was the lowest among those under 30 (12.2%). Among those under 30, the use of LinkedIn was deficient (2.0%). Google Scholar was the most frequently used academic social network (38.5%). Surgical specialists were more likely to share medical content. Under 30 and over 50 were more likely to share their medical titles on social media than other groups. The percentage of those who reported having also physically examined the patient during online communication was 64.5%. This high rate is by no means negligible. Patients' most frequent responses to online communication requests were via WhatsApp (80.3%). The under-30 age group was found to have less contact with patients on social media.
Conclusion: According to the results of the study, the use of the academic social network is lower than expected, even among academically active participants. The fact that Facebook usage is significantly lower among those under 30 suggests that Facebook is outdated as a social medium for young physicians. Participants in university hospitals, private clinics, and those under 40 use social media differently than other groups. More online patient communication is an important advance. It is also significant that the number of studies has increased after online communication. If investments are made in this topic, it can be expected that a substantial part of patient-doctor relationships will be handled online soon. However, social media studies wear out quickly, so they should be repeated frequently.

References

  • Charley Kline Sends the First Message Over the ARPANET from Leonard Kleinrock's Computer : History of Information [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?entryid=1108
  • The Evolution of Social Media: How Did It Begin and Where Could It Go Next? [Internet]. Maryville Online 2020 [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://online.maryville.edu/blog/evolution-social-media/
  • Lawal N. Top Five Academic Social Networking Sites for Scholars and Students [Internet]. Medium 2017 [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://medium.com/@NurdinLawal/top-five-academic-social-networking-sites-for-scholars-and-students-5b146e674f84
  • Doktorların Sosyal ve Akademik Sosyal Medya Kullanımı, Sosyal Medya Yardımı ile Hastalarıyla İletişim Kurması [İnternet]. Google Docs. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSePohU0bYNTpscHlyGTlarY8kf6ixPpOjzvXF51tSrNuRax5w/viewform?usp=send_form&usp=embed_facebook
  • Sağlık Bakanlığı TC. Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2019 Yayınlanmıştır [Internet]. T.C. Saglik Bakanligi. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR,84966/saglik-istatistikleri-yilligi-2019-yayinlanmistir.html
  • DIGITAL 2022: Another Year Of Bumper Growth [Internet]. We Are Social UK 2022 [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2022/01/digital-2022-another-year-of-bumper-growth-2/
  • Güler ÖGE. Akademik Personelin Akademik Sosyal Ağları Kullanim Düzeyi: Anadolu Üniversitesi 2013; 6.
  • Imran MK, Iqbal SMJ, Aslam U, Fatima T. Does social media promote knowledge exchange? A qualitative insight. Manag Decis 2019; 57: 688–702.
  • Brown J, Ryan C, Harris A. How Doctors View and Use Social Media: A National Survey. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e267.
  • von Muhlen M, Ohno-Machado L. Reviewing social media use by clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19: 777–81.
  • The Platform Doctors Trust for Online Video Education. VuMedi [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://www.vumedi.com/
  • Meishar-Tal H, Pieterse E. Why do academics use academic social networking sites? Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn [Internet] 2017; 18. Available from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2643
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Article
Authors

Deniz Gürler 0000-0001-7992-3278

Publication Date September 25, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 5 Issue: 5

Cite

AMA Gürler D. Examining social media and academic social network use, and trends in physician-patient communication via social media: a national study. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. September 2022;5(5):1259-1266. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1117561

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].

The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show







The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.

       images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRB9r6zRLDl0Pz7om2DQkiTQXqDtuq64Eb1Qg&usqp=CAU

500px-WorldCat_logo.svg.png

atifdizini.png

logo_world_of_journals_no_margin.png

images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTNpvUjQ4Ffc6uQBqMQrqYMR53c7bRqD9rohCINkko0Y1a_hPSn&usqp=CAU

doaj.png  

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSpOQFsFv3RdX0lIQJC3SwkFIA-CceHin_ujli_JrqBy3A32A_Tx_oMoIZn96EcrpLwTQg&usqp=CAU

ici2.png

asos-index.png

drji.png





The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.

COPE-logo-300x199.jpgimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQR6_qdgvxMP9owgnYzJ1M6CS_XzR_d7orTjA&usqp=CAU

icmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBcJw8ia8S9TI4Fun5vj3HPzEcEKIvF_jtnw&usqp=CAU

ORCID_logo.png

1*mvsP194Golg0Dmo2rjJ-oQ.jpeg


Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;

Ulakbim TR Dizin,  Index Copernicus, ICI World of JournalsDirectory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact FactorASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR,  EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC)DOAJ,  Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index


Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;

Google, Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, ICJME, COPE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, Open Access, and etc.


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review". 

Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user.  https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535

Journal charge policy   https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912


Editor List for 2022

Assoc. Prof. Alpaslan TANOĞLU (MD)  

Prof. Aydın ÇİFCİ (MD)

Prof. İbrahim Celalaettin HAZNEDAROĞLU (MD)

Prof. Murat KEKİLLİ (MD)

Prof. Yavuz BEYAZIT (MD) 

Prof. Ekrem ÜNAL (MD)

Prof. Ahmet EKEN (MD)

Assoc. Prof. Ercan YUVANÇ (MD)

Assoc. Prof. Bekir UÇAN (MD) 

Assoc. Prof. Mehmet Sinan DAL (MD)


Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.

Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.


17873

Articles published in the Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.