YouTube'da kumar bozukluğuna yönelik Türkçe bilgilendirici videoların analizi

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 91 - 96, 12.01.2025

Halil İbrahim Öztürk , Ferhat Sarı

https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1574305

Abstract

Amaçlar: Kumar bozukluğu (KD) için tedavi arama oranlarının düşük olması ve çevrimiçi kumarın popülerleşmesi, dijital platformlarda bilgilendirici videoların önemini artırmaktadır. YouTube'da KD için Türkçe bilgilendirici videoların özelliklerini ve kalitesini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık.
Yöntemler: Çalışma kriterlerini karşılayan toplam 116 video iki bağımsız psikiyatrist tarafından incelendi. Konuşmacılar, video süresi, görüntülenme sayısı, beğeniler ve yorumlar gibi nicel özelliklere ek olarak, videoların kalitesi ve güvenilirliği Küresel Kalite Ölçeği (GQS) ve modifiye edilmiş DISCERN ölçeği kullanılarak değerlendirildi.
Sonuçlar: Videoların %46,6'sı profesyonel gruptaydı (bir hekim, psikolog veya başka bir ruh sağlığı uzmanı olan bir konuşmacıyı veya sağlık/akademik kanallar tarafından yüklenen seslendirme videolarını içeriyordu). GQS puanlarına göre, videoların %58,6'sı düşük kalitede, %24,1'i orta kalitede ve %17,2'si iyi/mükemmel kalitedeydi. Profesyonel videolar için daha yüksek kalite puanlarına rağmen (GQS puanları: sırasıyla 3,24±0,79, 1,90±0,46), profesyonel olmayan videolar daha yüksek günlük ortalama görüntüleme, beğeni ve yoruma sahipti. GQS puanları ile ortalama günlük görüntüleme, beğeni ve yorum arasında negatif bir korelasyon olduğu, yalnızca video süresinin ise değiştirilmiş DISCERN puanlarıyla pozitif bir korelasyon gösterdiği bulundu.
Sonuç: GD için bilgilendirici videolar oluştururken, hastalar, yakınları veya ünlüler tarafından paylaşılan deneyimlerin ruh sağlığı profesyonelleri tarafından sunulan tıbbi bilgilerle birlikte dahil edilmesi, yüksek kalite ve güvenilirliği garanti altına alabilirken aynı zamanda daha yüksek etkileşim seviyeleri sağlayarak daha geniş bir kitleye ulaşabilir.

Keywords

Kumar, kumar bozukluğu, YouTube, davranışsal bağımlılıklar

Analysis of the Turkish informative videos for gambling disorder on YouTube

Abstract

Aims: The low rates of treatment seeking in gambling disorder (GD) and the popularization of online gambling increase the importance of informative videos on digital platforms. We aimed to evaluate the characteristics and quality of Turkish informative videos for GD on YouTube.
Methods: A total of 116 videos that met the study criteria were examined by two independent psychiatrists. In addition to quantitative characteristics such as the speakers, video duration, number of the views, likes, and comments, the quality and reliability of the videos were evaluated using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and modified DISCERN scale.
Results: 46.6% of the videos were in the professional group (featuring a speaker who is a physician, psychologist, or another mental health professional, or voice-over videos uploaded by health/academic channels). According to GQS scores, 58.6% of the videos were of low quality, 24.1% were of medium quality, and 17.2% were of good/excellent quality. Despite higher quality scores for professional videos (GQS scores: 3.24±0.79, 1.90±0.46, respectively), non-professional videos had higher daily average views, likes, and comments. It was found that there was a negative correlation between the GQS scores and the average daily views, likes, and comments, whereas only video duration showed a positive correlation with the modified DISCERN scores.
Conclusion: When creating informative videos for GD, including experiences shared by patients, their relatives, or celebrities along with the medical information presented by mental health professionals can ensure high quality and reliability while also providing higher levels of interaction, thereby reaching a wider audience.

Keywords

Gambling, gambling disorder, YouTube, behavioral addictions

References

• Evren C, Bozkurt M. Diagnosis and treatment of gambling disorder. Update Psychiatr. 2016;6(3):199-221.
• Ekici E. Kumar oynama bozukluğu. Yılbaş B, Öztürk Hİ (editörler). Alkol Madde Kullanım Bozuklukları ve Davranışsal Bağımlılıklar. 1. Baskı, Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi, 2022: 341-352.
• Çakmak S, Tamam L. Gambling disorder: an overview. J Dependence. 2018;19(3):78-97.
• American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
• Potenza MN, Balodis IM, Derevensky J, et al. Gambling disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):51. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0099-7
• Moreira D, Azeredo A, Dias P. Risk Factors for gambling disorder: a systematic review. J Gambl Stud. 2023;(2):483-511. doi:10.1007/s10899-023-10195-1 
• Håkansson A, Karlsson A, Widinghoff C. Primary and secondary diagnoses of gambling disorder and psychiatric comorbidity in the Swedish health care system-a nationwide register study. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:426. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00426
• Kessler RC, Hwang I, LaBrie R, et al. DSM-IV pathological gambling in the national comorbidity survey replication. Psychol Med. 2008;38(9):1351-1360. doi:10.1017/S0033291708002900.
• Ledgerwood D, Petry NM. Gambling and suicidality in treatment seeking pathological gamblers. J. Nerv Ment Dis. 2004; 192(10):711-714.
• Petry NM, Kiluk BD. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in treatment-seeking pathological gamblers. J Nervous Mental Dis. 2002;190(7):462-469.
• Ghelfi M, Scattola P, Giudici G, Velasco V. Online gambling: a systematic review of risk and protective factors in the adult population. J Gambl Stud. 2024;40(2):673-699. doi:10.1007/s10899-023-10258-3
• Cunningham JA. Little use of treatment among problem gamblers. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56(8):1024-1025. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.56.8.1024-a
• Braun B, Ludwig M, Sleczka P, et al. Gamblers seeking treatment: Who does and who doesn’t? J Behav Addict. 2014;3(3):189-198. doi:10.1556/JBA.3.2014.3.7
• Zhao BY, Huang L, Cheng X, et al. Digital health literacy and associated factors among internet users from China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):908. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18324-0
• Zhao Y, Zhang J. Consumer health information seeking in social media: a literature review. Health Info Libr J. 2017;34(4):268-283. doi:10.1111/hir.12192
• Erdogan Kaya A, Erdogan Akturk B. Quality and content analysis: can YouTube videos on agoraphobia be considered a reliable source? Cureus. 2023;15(8):e43318. doi:10.7759/cureus. 43318
• Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis-a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899-903. doi:10.3899/jrheum.111114
• Altunisik E, Firat YE. Quality and reliability analysis of essential tremor disease information on social media: the study of YouTube. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov. 2022;12:32. doi:10. 5334/tohm.727
• Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, et al. a systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):2070-2077. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x
• Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: An instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-111. doi:10.1136/jech.53.2.105
• Kaşıkçı MT, Yıldırm S. Analysing YouTube videos as a source for Alzheimer’s disease information. Med J Muğla Sıtkı Kocman Uni. 2021;8(3):215-219.
• Koo BS, Kim D, Jun JB. Reliability and quality of Korean YouTube videos for education regarding gout. J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36(45):e303. doi:10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e303
• Reinhardt L, Steeb T, Mifka A, et al. German Skin Cancer Council. Quality, understandability and reliability of YouTube videos on skin cancer screening. J Cancer Educ. 2023;38(5):1667-1674. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02320-w.
• Fidan Ö, Yüksel F, Çolak E, Oskay D. Investigation of quality and information content of YouTube™ videos on physical activity in the elderly. J Adnan Menderes Uni Health Sci Fac. 2023;7(2):393-409. doi:10.46237/amusbfd.1200969
• Ercan S. Information quality of Turkish videos on anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation: cross-sectional research on YouTube example. Curr Perspect Health Sci. 2021;2(2):91-96.
• Furtado MAS, Sousa Junior RR, Soares LA, et al. Analysis of informative content on cerebral palsy presented in Brazilian-Portuguese YouTube videos. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2022;42(4): 369-383. doi:10.1080/01942638.2022.2046677
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174. 
• Kim H, Nakamura C, Zeng Q. Assessment of pictographs developed through a participatory design process using an online survey tool. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(1):e4. doi:10.2196/jmir.1129
• Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA. 2007;298(21):2482-2484. doi:10.1001/jama.298.21.2482
• Sasse M, Ohrndorf S, Palmowski A, et al. Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis. Rheumatol Int. 2023;43(1):163-171. doi:10.1007/s00296-022-05243-9
• Dułak NA, Anuszkiewicz K, Trzciński R, et al. YouTube as a patient-information source for hypothyroidism. Minerva Endocrinol. 2023;48(4):371-378. doi:10.23736/S2724-6507.22. 03732-0
• Seo HW, Ha JW, Kwak JH, et al. A content analysis of YouTube videos on tinnitus in South Korea. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):13579. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40523-9
• Alsabhan JF, Almalag HM, Abanmy NO, et al. A content-quality and optimization analysis of YouTube as a source of patient information for bipolar disorder. Saudi Pharm J. 2024;32(4): 101997. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2024.101997
• Raj S, Ghosh A, Pandiyan S, et al. Analysis of YouTube content on substance use disorder treatment and recovery. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023;69(8):2097-2109. doi:10.1177/00207640231190304
• Wong NSM, Yeung AWK, McGrath CP, Leung YY. Qualitative evaluation of YouTube videos on dental fear, anxiety and phobia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;20(1):750. doi:10.3390/ijerph20010750
• Ozsoy-Unubol T, Alanbay-Yagci E. YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021;24(2):197-202. doi:10.1111/1756-185X.14043
• Ergenç M, Uprak TK. YouTube as a source of information on Helicobacter pylori: content and quality analysis. Helicobacter. 2023;28(4):e12971. doi:10.1111/hel.12971
• Diers CS, Remvig C, Meteran H, et al. The usefulness of YouTube videos as a source of information in asthma. J Asthma. 2023;60(4):737-743. doi:10.1080/02770903.2022.2093218
• O’Kelly B, Holmes P, Cheng A, et al. Dissemination of health content through social networks: YouTube and opioid use disorders. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024;165:209475. doi:10.1016/ j.josat.2024.209475
• Aglamis SO, Senel S, Koudonas A. Quality analysis of YouTube videos on vulvodynia. Sex Med. 2023;11(1):qfac013. doi:10.1093/sexmed/qfac013
• Mylavarapu M, Maheta D, Clarke S, et al. Diabetes mellitus on YouTube: a cross-sectional observational study to assess the quality and reliability of videos. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e43704. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43704
• Osman W, Mohamed F, Elhassan M, Shoufan A. Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):382. doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03446-z