Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, pediatrik hastalarda ayak bileği çevresi kırıklarında kırık tipi ve kullanılan implantların fonksiyonel sonuçlar, kaynama süresi, hastanede yatış süresi ve maliyet üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmektir.
Yöntem: 2017–2023 yılları arasında ayak bileği kırığı nedeniyle opere edilen toplam 58 olgu retrospektif olarak incelendi. Birinci grupta izole malleol kırıkları olan hastalar, ikinci grupta bimalleolar veya trimalleolar kırıkları olan hastalar, üçüncü grupta distal tibia kırıkları olan hastalar ve dördüncü grupta lateral malleol kırığıyla ile distal tibia kırıkları olan hastalar yer aldı. Kullanılan implanta göre hastalar beş grupta sınıflandırıldı: K teli, kanüllü vida, plak vida, kanüllü vida + plak vida ve kanüllü vida + plak vida + eksternal fiksatör.
Bulgular: İzole malleol kırığı olan hastalarda hastanede yatış süresi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde daha kısa bulundu (p=0,042). Aynı grupta kırık kaynama süresi de anlamlı düzeyde daha kısa idi (p=0,023). Tanıya göre yapılan maliyet analizinde; izole malleol kırıklarında 100–300 $ arası maliyetler daha yaygınken, distal tibia kırıklarında >300 $ maliyetler daha sık görüldü (p=0,001). İyileşme sonrası AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society) skorları, izole malleol kırığı grubunda bimalleoler/trimalleoler ve distal tibia kırığı gruplarına kıyasla anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksekti (p=0,001). Beş implant grubunun karşılaştırmasında, kanüllü vida + plak vida + fiksatör grubunda ortalama kaynama süresi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde daha uzundu (p=0,0001). Plak vida grubunda da kaynama süresi, K teli ve kanüllü vida gruplarına göre anlamlı şekilde daha uzundu (p=0,002 ve p=0,0001). Diğer gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark gözlenmedi (p>0,05). İyileşme sonrası AOFAS skorları, K teli grubunda plak vida ve kanüllü vida + plak vida + fiksatör gruplarına göre anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek bulundu (p=0,018).
Sonuç: İzole malleol kırıkları, travmanın daha minör olması nedeniyle daha kısa hastanede yatış süresi, daha hızlı kaynama süresi, daha iyi fonksiyonel sonuçlar ve daha düşük implant maliyeti ile seyretmektedir. Distal tibia kırıklarında implant maliyeti daha yüksek olmasına rağmen, diğer klinik sonuçlar benzer bulunmuştur.
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of fracture type and implant used in ankle-related fractures in pediatric patients on functional outcome, union time, hospital stay and cost.
Methods: A total of 58 cases operated on due to ankle fractures between 2017 and 2023 were reviewed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to diagnosis. The first group included patients with isolated malleolus fractures, the second group included patients with bimalleolar or trimalleolar fractures, the third group included patients with distal tibia fractures, and the fourth group included patients with distal tibia fractures with a lateral malleolus. Patients were divided into five groups according to the implants used. These were determined as: K-wire, cannulated screw, plate screw, cannulated screw and plate screw, cannulated screw and plate screw+fixator. Demographic characteristics, union times, implant costs, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score were examined between the groups.
Results: Union time was significantly shorter in patients with isolated malleolar fractures compared to other groups (p=0.042). Cost analysis by diagnosis showed that costs in the range of $100-300 were more common in isolated malleolar fractures, whereas costs exceeding $300 were more common in distal tibia fractures (p=0.001). Post-recovery AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society) scores were significantly higher in the isolated malleolar fracture group compared to the bimalleolar/trimalleolar and distal tibia fracture groups (p=0.001). Comparison between all groups; implant comparison, the mean union time (in months) was significantly longer in the cannulated screw+plate and screw+fixator group compared to the K-wire, cannulated screw, plate and screw, and cannulated screw+plate and screw groups (p=0.0001). The plate and screw group also had significantly longer union times than the K-wire and cannulated screw groups (p=0.002, p=0.0001). Post-recovery AOFAS scores were significantly higher in the K-wire group compared to the plate and screw and cannulated screw+plate and screw+fixator groups (p=0.018).
Conclusion: In isolated malleolar fractures, due to the more minor nature of the trauma, shorter hospital stays, quicker fracture union, better functional outcomes, and lower implant costs were observed. Implant costs did not affect functional outcomes or time to union.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Orthopaedics |
Journal Section | Original Article |
Authors | |
Publication Date | September 16, 2025 |
Submission Date | July 1, 2025 |
Acceptance Date | August 8, 2025 |
Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 8 Issue: 5 |
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].
The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show
The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.
The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.
Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;
Ulakbim TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR, EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC), DOAJ, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index
Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review".
Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user. https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535
Journal charge policy https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912
Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.
Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.
Articles published in the Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.