Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Fetal anomalilere bağlı fetosid olgularında tanı, işlem zamanlaması ve perinatal sonuçların değerlendirilmesi

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 6, 1049 - 1054, 25.10.2025

Abstract

Amaç:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, tıbbi nedenlerle selektif fetosid uygulanan gebeliklerde fetal anomali etiyolojilerini ve perinatal sonuçları değerlendirmektir.

Yöntemler:
Bu retrospektif gözlemsel çalışmaya, Ocak 2020 ile Ocak 2025 tarihleri arasında Bursa Şehir Hastanesi Perinatoloji Birimi’nde fetosid uygulanan 76 gebelik dahil edilmiştir. Maternal demografik özellikler, fetal anomali türleri ve doğum sonuçları sistematik olarak analiz edilmiştir. Dikoryonik ikiz gebeliklerde fetosid sonrası hayatta kalan ikiz fetüse ait perinatal veriler ayrıca değerlendirilmiştir. Fetosid işlemleri, çoğunlukla 21. gebelik haftasından sonra, deneyimli perinatologlar tarafından ultrason rehberliğinde intrauterin intrakardiyak potasyum klorür (KCl) enjeksiyonu ile fetal asistoli sağlanarak gerçekleştirilmiştir.

Bulgular:
Fetosid için en yaygın endikasyon santral sinir sistemi anomalileri (%39.5) olup, bunu kromozomal anomaliler (%19.7) ve kardiyovasküler anomaliler (%17.1) izlemiştir. En sık rastlanan tanılar arasında anensefali, spina bifida, trizomi 21 ve hipoplastik sol kalp sendromu yer almaktadır.
Dikoryonik ikiz gebeliklerde, sağ kalan fetüsün ortalama doğum haftası 32.8, ortalama doğum ağırlığı ise 2266 gram olarak bulunmuştur. Bu olguların %71.4’ünde 1. dakika Apgar skoru ≥7, %78.6’sında ise 5. dakika Apgar skoru ≥8 olarak saptanmıştır. Yenidoğan yoğun bakım ünitesi (YYBÜ) yatış oranı %9.2’dir.

Sonuç:
Selektif fetosid uygulamalarında en sık görülen endikasyon santral sinir sistemi anomalileridir; bunu kromozomal ve kardiyovasküler anomaliler takip etmektedir. Uygun zamanlama ve hasta seçimi ile uygulandığında, dikoryonik ikiz gebeliklerde selektif fetosid işlemi, sağ kalan fetüs açısından güvenli ve etkili bir yaklaşım gibi görünmektedir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye'den elde edilen değerli verileri sunmakta ve gelecekte yapılacak çok merkezli prospektif araştırmalar için temel oluşturmaktadır.

References

  • Phadke SR, Agarwal M, Aggarwal S. Late termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormalities: the perspective of Indian lay persons and medical practitioners. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(13):1286-1291. doi:10.1002/pd.2887
  • Rydberg C, Tunón K. Detection of fetal abnormalities by second-trimester ultrasound screening in a non-selected population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(2):176-182. doi:10.1111/aogs.13125
  • Pasquini L, Pontello V, Kumar S. Intracardiac injection of potassium chloride as method for feticide: experience from a single UK tertiary centre. BJOG. 2008;115(4):528-531. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01646.x
  • Breeze AC, Lees CC, Kumar A, Missfelder-Lobos HH, Murdoch EM. Palliative care for prenatally diagnosed lethal fetal abnormality. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92(1):F56-F58. doi:10.1136/adc.2006. 099598
  • Resmi Gazete. Law No. 2827 on Population Planning. Tertip: 1983;22: 352. [in Turkish]
  • Gursoy A. Abortion in Turkiye: a matter of state, family or individual decision. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42(4):531-542. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95) 00165-4
  • Senat MV, Fischer C, Bernard JP, Ville Y. The use of lidocaine for fetocide in late termination of pregnancy. BJOG. 2003;110(3):296-300. doi:10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02283.x
  • Govender L, Moodley J. Late termination of pregnancy by intracardiac potassium chloride injection: 5 years’ experience at a tertiary referral centre. S Afr Med J. 2013;103(1):47-51. doi:10.7196/samj.5967
  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The care of women requesting induced abortion. Guideline No. 7. London: RCOG Press; 2004.
  • Diedrich J, Drey E; Society of Family Planning. Induction of fetal demise before abortion. Contraception. 2010;81(6):462-473. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.01.024
  • Sharvit M, Klein Z, Silber M, et al. Intra-amniotic digoxin for feticide between 21 and 30 weeks of gestation: a prospective study. BJOG. 2019; 126(7):885-889. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15656
  • Tufa TH, Prager S, Lavelanet AF, Kim C. Drugs used to induce fetal demise prior to abortion: a systematic review. Contracept X. 2020;2: 100046. doi:10.1016/j.conx.2020.100046
  • Dar P, Shani H, Evans MI. Cell-free DNA: comparison of technologies. Clin Lab Med. 2016;36(2):199-211. doi:10.1016/j.cll.2016.01.004
  • Barel O, Vaknin Z, Smorgick N, et al. Fetal abnormalities leading to third trimester abortion: nine-year experience from a single medical center. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29(3):223-228. doi:10.1002/pd.2206
  • Corbacıoğlu A, Aslan H, Aydın S, et al. Trends in fetal indications for termination of pregnancy between 2002 and 2010 at a tertiary referral centre. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2012;13(2):85-90. doi:10.5152/jtgga. 2012.10
  • Hern WM. Fetal diagnostic indications for second and third trimester outpatient pregnancy termination. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(5):438-444. doi:10.1002/pd.4331
  • Carlson LM, Vora NL. Prenatal diagnosis: screening and diagnostic tools. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017;44(2):245-256. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2017.02.004
  • Cuckle H, Maymon R. Development of prenatal screening: a historical overview. Semin Perinatol. 2016;40(1):12-22. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2015. 11.002
  • Dommergues M, Mandelbrot L, Mahieu-Caputo D, et al. Termination of pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis in France: how severe are the foetal anomalies? Prenat Diagn. 2010;30(6):531-539. doi:10.1002/pd.2501
  • Wyldes MP, Tonks AM. Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a population-based study 1995 to 2004. BJOG. 2007;114(5):639-642. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01311.x
  • Vaknin Z, Ben-Ami I, Reish O, et al. Fetal abnormalities leading to termination of singleton pregnancy: the 7-year experience of a single medical center. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26(10):938-943. doi:10.1002/pd.1527
  • Minnella GP, Crupano FM, Syngelaki A, et al. Diagnosis of major heart defects by routine first-trimester ultrasound examination: association with increased nuchal translucency, tricuspid regurgitation and abnormal flow in ductus venosus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 55(5):637-644. doi:10.1002/uog.20450
  • Ozyuncu O, Orgul G, Tanacan A, et al. Retrospective analysis of indications for termination of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39(3): 355-358. doi:10.1080/01443615.2018.1515197
  • Kristensen SE, Ekelund CK, Sandager P, et al. Risks and pregnancy outcome after fetal reduction in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a Danish national retrospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5): 590.e1-590.e12. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.018
  • Garofalo G, Garofalo A, Sochirca O, et al. Maternal outcomes in first and second trimester termination of pregnancy: which are the risk factors? J Perinat Med. 2018;46(4):373-378. doi:10.1515/jpm-2017-0137

Evaluation of diagnosis, timing of procedure, and perinatal outcomes in fetocide cases due to fetal anomalies

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 6, 1049 - 1054, 25.10.2025

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the etiologies of fetal anomalies and the perinatal outcomes of pregnancies undergoing medically indicated selective fetocide.
Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed 76 pregnancies that underwent fetocide at the Perinatology Unit of Bursa City Hospital between January 2020 and January 2025. Maternal demographics, types of fetal anomalies, and delivery outcomes were systematically reviewed. In dichorionic twin pregnancies, perinatal outcomes of the surviving co-twin were assessed separately. Fetocide was predominantly performed after 21 weeks of gestation by experienced perinatologists under ultrasound guidance, using intracardiac potassium chloride (KCl) injection to induce fetal asystole.
Results: Central nervous system anomalies were the most common indication for fetocide (39.5%), followed by chromosomal anomalies (19.7%) and cardiovascular anomalies (17.1%). The most frequent diagnoses included anencephaly, spina bifida, trisomy 21, and hypoplastic left heart syndrome. In dichorionic twin pregnancies, the mean gestational age at delivery of the surviving fetus was 32.8 weeks, with a mean birth weight of 2266 g. Among these, 71.4% had a 1-minute Apgar score ≥7 and 78.6% had a 5-minute Apgar score ≥8. The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission rate was 9.2%.
Conclusion: Central nervous system anomalies were the most common indication for selective fetocide, followed by chromosomal and cardiovascular anomalies. When performed with appropriate timing and patient selection, selective fetocide in dichorionic twin pregnancies it may be a safe and effective approach for the surviving fetus. This study provides valuable data from Turkiye and serves as a foundation for future multicenter prospective research.

References

  • Phadke SR, Agarwal M, Aggarwal S. Late termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormalities: the perspective of Indian lay persons and medical practitioners. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(13):1286-1291. doi:10.1002/pd.2887
  • Rydberg C, Tunón K. Detection of fetal abnormalities by second-trimester ultrasound screening in a non-selected population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(2):176-182. doi:10.1111/aogs.13125
  • Pasquini L, Pontello V, Kumar S. Intracardiac injection of potassium chloride as method for feticide: experience from a single UK tertiary centre. BJOG. 2008;115(4):528-531. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01646.x
  • Breeze AC, Lees CC, Kumar A, Missfelder-Lobos HH, Murdoch EM. Palliative care for prenatally diagnosed lethal fetal abnormality. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92(1):F56-F58. doi:10.1136/adc.2006. 099598
  • Resmi Gazete. Law No. 2827 on Population Planning. Tertip: 1983;22: 352. [in Turkish]
  • Gursoy A. Abortion in Turkiye: a matter of state, family or individual decision. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42(4):531-542. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95) 00165-4
  • Senat MV, Fischer C, Bernard JP, Ville Y. The use of lidocaine for fetocide in late termination of pregnancy. BJOG. 2003;110(3):296-300. doi:10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02283.x
  • Govender L, Moodley J. Late termination of pregnancy by intracardiac potassium chloride injection: 5 years’ experience at a tertiary referral centre. S Afr Med J. 2013;103(1):47-51. doi:10.7196/samj.5967
  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The care of women requesting induced abortion. Guideline No. 7. London: RCOG Press; 2004.
  • Diedrich J, Drey E; Society of Family Planning. Induction of fetal demise before abortion. Contraception. 2010;81(6):462-473. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.01.024
  • Sharvit M, Klein Z, Silber M, et al. Intra-amniotic digoxin for feticide between 21 and 30 weeks of gestation: a prospective study. BJOG. 2019; 126(7):885-889. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15656
  • Tufa TH, Prager S, Lavelanet AF, Kim C. Drugs used to induce fetal demise prior to abortion: a systematic review. Contracept X. 2020;2: 100046. doi:10.1016/j.conx.2020.100046
  • Dar P, Shani H, Evans MI. Cell-free DNA: comparison of technologies. Clin Lab Med. 2016;36(2):199-211. doi:10.1016/j.cll.2016.01.004
  • Barel O, Vaknin Z, Smorgick N, et al. Fetal abnormalities leading to third trimester abortion: nine-year experience from a single medical center. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29(3):223-228. doi:10.1002/pd.2206
  • Corbacıoğlu A, Aslan H, Aydın S, et al. Trends in fetal indications for termination of pregnancy between 2002 and 2010 at a tertiary referral centre. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2012;13(2):85-90. doi:10.5152/jtgga. 2012.10
  • Hern WM. Fetal diagnostic indications for second and third trimester outpatient pregnancy termination. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(5):438-444. doi:10.1002/pd.4331
  • Carlson LM, Vora NL. Prenatal diagnosis: screening and diagnostic tools. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017;44(2):245-256. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2017.02.004
  • Cuckle H, Maymon R. Development of prenatal screening: a historical overview. Semin Perinatol. 2016;40(1):12-22. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2015. 11.002
  • Dommergues M, Mandelbrot L, Mahieu-Caputo D, et al. Termination of pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis in France: how severe are the foetal anomalies? Prenat Diagn. 2010;30(6):531-539. doi:10.1002/pd.2501
  • Wyldes MP, Tonks AM. Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a population-based study 1995 to 2004. BJOG. 2007;114(5):639-642. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01311.x
  • Vaknin Z, Ben-Ami I, Reish O, et al. Fetal abnormalities leading to termination of singleton pregnancy: the 7-year experience of a single medical center. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26(10):938-943. doi:10.1002/pd.1527
  • Minnella GP, Crupano FM, Syngelaki A, et al. Diagnosis of major heart defects by routine first-trimester ultrasound examination: association with increased nuchal translucency, tricuspid regurgitation and abnormal flow in ductus venosus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 55(5):637-644. doi:10.1002/uog.20450
  • Ozyuncu O, Orgul G, Tanacan A, et al. Retrospective analysis of indications for termination of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39(3): 355-358. doi:10.1080/01443615.2018.1515197
  • Kristensen SE, Ekelund CK, Sandager P, et al. Risks and pregnancy outcome after fetal reduction in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a Danish national retrospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5): 590.e1-590.e12. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.018
  • Garofalo G, Garofalo A, Sochirca O, et al. Maternal outcomes in first and second trimester termination of pregnancy: which are the risk factors? J Perinat Med. 2018;46(4):373-378. doi:10.1515/jpm-2017-0137
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Journal Section Original Article
Authors

Ebu Bekir Sıddık Yılmaz 0000-0003-4425-1998

Erkan Sağlam 0000-0001-5600-5597

Publication Date October 25, 2025
Submission Date June 25, 2025
Acceptance Date October 2, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 8 Issue: 6

Cite

AMA Yılmaz EBS, Sağlam E. Evaluation of diagnosis, timing of procedure, and perinatal outcomes in fetocide cases due to fetal anomalies. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. October 2025;8(6):1049-1054.

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].

The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show







The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.

       images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRB9r6zRLDl0Pz7om2DQkiTQXqDtuq64Eb1Qg&usqp=CAU

500px-WorldCat_logo.svg.png

atifdizini.png

logo_world_of_journals_no_margin.png

images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTNpvUjQ4Ffc6uQBqMQrqYMR53c7bRqD9rohCINkko0Y1a_hPSn&usqp=CAU

doaj.png  

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSpOQFsFv3RdX0lIQJC3SwkFIA-CceHin_ujli_JrqBy3A32A_Tx_oMoIZn96EcrpLwTQg&usqp=CAU

ici2.png

asos-index.png

drji.png





The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.

COPE-logo-300x199.jpgimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQR6_qdgvxMP9owgnYzJ1M6CS_XzR_d7orTjA&usqp=CAU

icmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBcJw8ia8S9TI4Fun5vj3HPzEcEKIvF_jtnw&usqp=CAU

ORCID_logo.png

1*mvsP194Golg0Dmo2rjJ-oQ.jpeg


Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;

Ulakbim TR Dizin,  Index Copernicus, ICI World of JournalsDirectory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact FactorASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR,  EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC)DOAJ,  Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index


Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;

Google, Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, ICJME, COPE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, Open Access, and etc.


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review". 

Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user.  https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535

Journal charge policy   https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912

Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.

Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.


17873

Articles published in the Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.