Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Annelerin sünnet hakkındaki bilgi ve tutumları ile ebeveyn demografisinin etkisi: retrospektif bir çalışma

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 6, 1034 - 1040, 25.10.2025
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1734992

Abstract

Introduction and Aim:
Circumcision is a surgical procedure performed on nearly all males in our society. This study aimed to evaluate mothers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding circumcision and to raise awareness of common misconceptions that may lead to adverse outcomes.
Materials and Methods:
This retrospective study was conducted between February 17 and April 17, 2014, among mothers whose children had previously undergone circumcision and who presented to the pediatric outpatient clinic for any reason. A total of 540 mothers were included. A structured questionnaire assessing socioeconomic status, educational background, and knowledge about circumcision was administered.
Results:
The study included 540 mothers. The mean age at circumcision was 3.7 ± 2.6 years. Circumcision was performed during the neonatal period in 13.8% (n=75), at 1–2 years in 24.9% (n=135), at 3–6 years in 44.3% (n=240), and after 6 years in 17% (n=92) of cases. Mothers with lower socioeconomic and educational levels had significantly less knowledge regarding circumcision.
Conclusion:
The majority of circumcisions were performed between the ages of 3 and 6, a developmentally sensitive period. The findings suggest that families were generally unaware of the potential psychological and medical risks associated with circumcision at this age. Mothers with low income and education levels should be included in educational programs to improve awareness about the benefits and possible complications of circumcision.

Ethical Statement

Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by the Istanbul Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital Ethics Committee (Date: 11.02.2014, Decision No: 161). Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all participating mothers. Referee Evaluation Process: Externally peer-reviewed. Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support. Author Contributions: All authors contributed equally to the design, data collection, analysis, and writing of the manuscript. Acknowledgement: Not applicable.

Supporting Institution

Bu çalışma herhangi bir kurum veya kuruluş tarafından desteklenmemiştir.

References

  • Levine LA, Holzbeierlein JM. Surgery of the Penis and Urethra. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA, eds. Campbell-Walsh-Wein Urology. 12th ed. Vol 1. Elsevier; 2021:992-1022.
  • Zeitler M, Rayala B. Neonatal circumcision. Prim Care. 2021;48(4):597-611. doi:10.1016/j.pop.2021.08.002
  • Barthold JS. Anomalies of the penis and urethra. In: Kliegman RM, St. Geme JW, Blum NJ, et al, eds. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 22nd ed. Elsevier; 2023. Chapter 559.
  • Karaman Mİ. Her yönüyle sünnet. Pediatrik Üroloji Bülteni. 2018;1(1):1-4.
  • Dekkers W. Routine (non-religious) neonatal circumcision and bodily integrity: a transatlantic dialogue. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2009;19(2):125-146. doi:10.1353/ken.0.0279
  • Schoen EJ, Colby CJ, Ray GT. Newborn circumcision decreases incidence and costs of urinary tract infections during the first year of life. Pediatrics. 2000;105(4 Pt 1):789-793. doi:10.1542/peds.105.4.789
  • Omole F, Smith W, Carter-Wicker K. Newborn circumcision techniques. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101(11):680-685.
  • Yazıcı M, Etensel B, Gürsoy H. Sünnet komplikasyonları. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2003;4(3):5-7.
  • Iacob SI, Feinn RS, Sardi L. Systematic review of complications arising from male circumcision. BJUI Compass. 2021;3(2):99-123. doi:10.1002/bco2.123
  • Uprak TK. Recommendation versus current status: retrospective analysis of age to circumcise in a district hospital. Istanbul Med J. 2023; 24(1):1-6.
  • Yavuz F, Kobya Bulut H. The effect of circumcision age on anxiety and self-perception in boys. Compr Child Adolesc Nurs. 2024;47(3):214-223. doi:10.1080/24694193.2024.2389420
  • Sılay MS. Male circumcision during phallic period and psychological perspective. Turk Clin J Urol Spec Topics. 2018;11(1):45-48.
  • Yılmaz Y, Özsoy SA, Ardahan M. Annelerin sünnet hakkındaki davranış ve bilgi düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Ege Tıp Dergisi. 2008;47:93-101.
  • Özkan H. Annelerin sünnet hakkındaki bilgi düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. In: 3. Uluslararası, 4. Ulusal Ebelik Kongresi; May 2017; Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Hutson JM. Male circumcision complications: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Urol. 2021;205(5):1234-1240.
  • Task Force on Circumcision, Blank S, Brady M, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):585-586.
  • Appiah Boakye S, Obeng F. Clinical outcomes of circumcisions and prevalence of complications: a five-year retrospective analysis at a teaching hospital in Ghana. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025;5(2): e0003788. doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003788
  • Benli E, Koca O. Bingöl ilinde sünnet araştırması. Yeni Ürol Derg. 2011; 6:22-25.
  • Geçit I, Benli E. Bölgemizdeki sünnet komplikasyonları. Van Tıp Derg. 2011;18(18):155-158.
  • Ferhatoğlu MF, Kartal A, Gürkan A. Evaluation of male circumcision: retrospective analysis of one hundred and ninety-eight patients. Cureus. 2019;11(4):e4555. doi:10.7759/cureus.4555
  • Özkan A, Özorak A, Oruç M. Bin dokuz yüz sünnet olgusunda komplikasyonların retrospektif incelenmesi. Konuralp Tıp Derg. 2012; 4(1):8-12.
  • Yapanoğlu T, Aksoy Y, Atmaca AF, et al. Bölgemizdeki sünnet komplikasyonları. Türk Ürol Derg. 2004;30(4):441-445.
  • Çataklı T, Yazarlı E, Yener F, Bilge YD. Bir hastaneye başvuran annelerin sünnet hakkındaki bilgi düzeyleri. Erciyes Med J. 2012;34(3):116-120. doi:10.5152/etd.2012.35
  • Öztürk O, Samut Bülbül S, Durmuşoğlu K. Ebeveynlerin çocuklarda sünnet operasyonuna yönelik bilgi ve tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi. J Med Clin. 2024;7(1):11-19.

Mothers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding circumcision and the influence of parental demographics: a retrospective study

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 6, 1034 - 1040, 25.10.2025
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1734992

Abstract

Aims: Circumcision is a surgical procedure performed on nearly all males in our society. This study aimed to evaluate mothers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding circumcision and to raise awareness of common misconceptions that may lead to adverse outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted between February 17 and April 17, 2014, among mothers whose children had previously undergone circumcision and who presented to the pediatric outpatient clinic for any reason. A total of 540 mothers were included. A structured questionnaire assessing socioeconomic status, educational background, and knowledge about circumcision was administered.
Results: The study included 540 mothers. The mean age at circumcision was 3.7±2.6 years. Circumcision was performed during the neonatal period in 13.8% (n=75), at 1-2 years in 24.9% (n=135), at 3-6 years in 44.3% (n=240), and after 6 years in 17% (n=92) of cases. Mothers with lower socioeconomic and educational levels had significantly less knowledge regarding circumcision.
Conclusion: The majority of circumcisions were performed between the ages of 3 and 6, a developmentally vulnerable period. The findings suggest that families were generally unaware of the potential psychological effects and medical risks associated with circumcision at this age. Mothers with low income and education levels should be included in educational programs to improve awareness about the benefits and possible complications of circumcision.

References

  • Levine LA, Holzbeierlein JM. Surgery of the Penis and Urethra. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA, eds. Campbell-Walsh-Wein Urology. 12th ed. Vol 1. Elsevier; 2021:992-1022.
  • Zeitler M, Rayala B. Neonatal circumcision. Prim Care. 2021;48(4):597-611. doi:10.1016/j.pop.2021.08.002
  • Barthold JS. Anomalies of the penis and urethra. In: Kliegman RM, St. Geme JW, Blum NJ, et al, eds. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 22nd ed. Elsevier; 2023. Chapter 559.
  • Karaman Mİ. Her yönüyle sünnet. Pediatrik Üroloji Bülteni. 2018;1(1):1-4.
  • Dekkers W. Routine (non-religious) neonatal circumcision and bodily integrity: a transatlantic dialogue. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2009;19(2):125-146. doi:10.1353/ken.0.0279
  • Schoen EJ, Colby CJ, Ray GT. Newborn circumcision decreases incidence and costs of urinary tract infections during the first year of life. Pediatrics. 2000;105(4 Pt 1):789-793. doi:10.1542/peds.105.4.789
  • Omole F, Smith W, Carter-Wicker K. Newborn circumcision techniques. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101(11):680-685.
  • Yazıcı M, Etensel B, Gürsoy H. Sünnet komplikasyonları. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2003;4(3):5-7.
  • Iacob SI, Feinn RS, Sardi L. Systematic review of complications arising from male circumcision. BJUI Compass. 2021;3(2):99-123. doi:10.1002/bco2.123
  • Uprak TK. Recommendation versus current status: retrospective analysis of age to circumcise in a district hospital. Istanbul Med J. 2023; 24(1):1-6.
  • Yavuz F, Kobya Bulut H. The effect of circumcision age on anxiety and self-perception in boys. Compr Child Adolesc Nurs. 2024;47(3):214-223. doi:10.1080/24694193.2024.2389420
  • Sılay MS. Male circumcision during phallic period and psychological perspective. Turk Clin J Urol Spec Topics. 2018;11(1):45-48.
  • Yılmaz Y, Özsoy SA, Ardahan M. Annelerin sünnet hakkındaki davranış ve bilgi düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Ege Tıp Dergisi. 2008;47:93-101.
  • Özkan H. Annelerin sünnet hakkındaki bilgi düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. In: 3. Uluslararası, 4. Ulusal Ebelik Kongresi; May 2017; Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Hutson JM. Male circumcision complications: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Urol. 2021;205(5):1234-1240.
  • Task Force on Circumcision, Blank S, Brady M, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):585-586.
  • Appiah Boakye S, Obeng F. Clinical outcomes of circumcisions and prevalence of complications: a five-year retrospective analysis at a teaching hospital in Ghana. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025;5(2): e0003788. doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003788
  • Benli E, Koca O. Bingöl ilinde sünnet araştırması. Yeni Ürol Derg. 2011; 6:22-25.
  • Geçit I, Benli E. Bölgemizdeki sünnet komplikasyonları. Van Tıp Derg. 2011;18(18):155-158.
  • Ferhatoğlu MF, Kartal A, Gürkan A. Evaluation of male circumcision: retrospective analysis of one hundred and ninety-eight patients. Cureus. 2019;11(4):e4555. doi:10.7759/cureus.4555
  • Özkan A, Özorak A, Oruç M. Bin dokuz yüz sünnet olgusunda komplikasyonların retrospektif incelenmesi. Konuralp Tıp Derg. 2012; 4(1):8-12.
  • Yapanoğlu T, Aksoy Y, Atmaca AF, et al. Bölgemizdeki sünnet komplikasyonları. Türk Ürol Derg. 2004;30(4):441-445.
  • Çataklı T, Yazarlı E, Yener F, Bilge YD. Bir hastaneye başvuran annelerin sünnet hakkındaki bilgi düzeyleri. Erciyes Med J. 2012;34(3):116-120. doi:10.5152/etd.2012.35
  • Öztürk O, Samut Bülbül S, Durmuşoğlu K. Ebeveynlerin çocuklarda sünnet operasyonuna yönelik bilgi ve tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi. J Med Clin. 2024;7(1):11-19.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Paediatrics (Other)
Journal Section Original Article
Authors

Damla Erden 0000-0003-3650-3518

Vefik Arıca 0000-0002-2080-4677

Publication Date October 25, 2025
Submission Date July 5, 2025
Acceptance Date September 25, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 8 Issue: 6

Cite

AMA Erden D, Arıca V. Mothers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding circumcision and the influence of parental demographics: a retrospective study. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. October 2025;8(6):1034-1040. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1734992

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].

The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show







The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.

       images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRB9r6zRLDl0Pz7om2DQkiTQXqDtuq64Eb1Qg&usqp=CAU

500px-WorldCat_logo.svg.png

atifdizini.png

logo_world_of_journals_no_margin.png

images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTNpvUjQ4Ffc6uQBqMQrqYMR53c7bRqD9rohCINkko0Y1a_hPSn&usqp=CAU

doaj.png  

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSpOQFsFv3RdX0lIQJC3SwkFIA-CceHin_ujli_JrqBy3A32A_Tx_oMoIZn96EcrpLwTQg&usqp=CAU

ici2.png

asos-index.png

drji.png





The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.

COPE-logo-300x199.jpgimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQR6_qdgvxMP9owgnYzJ1M6CS_XzR_d7orTjA&usqp=CAU

icmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBcJw8ia8S9TI4Fun5vj3HPzEcEKIvF_jtnw&usqp=CAU

ORCID_logo.png

1*mvsP194Golg0Dmo2rjJ-oQ.jpeg


Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;

Ulakbim TR Dizin,  Index Copernicus, ICI World of JournalsDirectory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact FactorASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR,  EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC)DOAJ,  Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index


Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;

Google, Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, ICJME, COPE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, Open Access, and etc.


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review". 

Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user.  https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535

Journal charge policy   https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912

Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.

Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.


17873

Articles published in the Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.