Effect of Activator Type on the Fire Resistance of Geopolymer Binders Incorporating Construction and Demolition Waste and Slag

Abstract

Increasing circular economy trends have encouraged researchers to develop new binding materials such as geopolymers. In the context of waste material utilization, geopolymers are considered suitable alternative materials to cement. However, early geopolymer studies primarily focused on the development of fire-resistant materials. Parallel to the growing circular economy trend, the utilization of construction and demolition waste in binding materials has become increasingly popular. Previous studies have shown that construction and demolition waste-based geopolymers can achieve comparable performance to those produced with conventional precursors such as blast furnace slag and fly ash. This research aims to assess the fire resistance of geopolymers produced using construction and demolition waste and ground granulated blast furnace slag. Different Na₂SiO₃/NaOH ratios ranging from 0 to 1.00 were evaluated as the main experimental parameter. The results indicate that among the tested mixtures, the geopolymer activated solely with 10 M NaOH exhibited the highest fire resistance performance after exposure to 600°C, with flexural and compressive strength losses of 79.8% and 53.6%, respectively. The addition of Na₂SiO₃ reduced the fire durability of geopolymer mortars, increasing the flexural strength losses to approximately 84–88%. In addition, it is expected that these results may vary depending on the type and reactivity of the raw materials used.

Keywords

• Fire Resistance
• Construction and Demolition Waste
• Geopolymers
• Alkali Activated Materials

Supporting Institution

Ankara University

Project Number

FBG-2024-3246

Thanks

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Ankara University provided under Grant No: FBG-2024-3246.

References

1. Amran, M., Huang, S. S., Debbarma, S., & Rashid, R. S. M. (2022). Fire resistance of geopolymer concrete: A critical review. In Construction and Building Materials (Vol. 324). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126722
2. Andrew, R. M. (2017). Global CO2 emissions from cement production. Earth System Science Data Discussions, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2017-77
3. Brykov, A. S., & Korneev, V. I. (2008). Production and usage of powdered alkali metal silicate hydrates. Metallurgist, 52(11–12), 648–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-009-9108-5
4. Çelikten, S., Baran, B., & Sarıdemir, M. (2025). Green optimization of vapour-cured geopolymer mortars: Predicting cost, mechanical properties, and environmental impact with artificial neural networks. Cleaner Waste Systems, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100270
5. Darvish, P., Johnson Alengaram, U., Soon Poh, Y., Ibrahim, S., & Yusoff, S. (2020). Performance evaluation of palm oil clinker sand as replacement for conventional sand in geopolymer mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 258, 120352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120352
6. Davidovits, J. (1991). Geopolymers. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 37, 1633–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12127-7_299-1
7. Demiral, N. C., Ozkan Ekinci, M., Sahin, O., Ilcan, H., Kul, A., Yildirim, G., & Sahmaran, M. (2022). Mechanical anisotropy evaluation and bonding properties of 3D-printable construction and demolition waste-based geopolymer mortars. Cement and Concrete Composites, 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104814
8. Fernández-Jiménez, A., Pastor, J. Y., Martín, A., & Palomo, A. (2010). High-temperature resistance in alkali-activated cement. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 93(10), 3411–3417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03887.x

9. Hassan, A., Arif, M., Shariq, M., Alomayri, T., & Pereira, S. (2023). Fire resistance characteristics of geopolymer concrete for environmental sustainability: a review of thermal, mechanical and microstructure properties. In Environment, Development and Sustainability (Vol. 25, Issue 9). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02495-0
10. Ishwarya, G., Singh, B., Deshwal, S., & Bhattacharyya, S. K. (2019). Effect of sodium carbonate/sodium silicate activator on the rheology, geopolymerization and strength of fly ash/slag geopolymer pastes. Cement and Concrete Composites, 97(December 2018), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.007
11. Kalifa, P., Menneteau, Ë., & Quenard, D. (2000). Kalifa, P., Menneteau, F. R., Quenard, D. Spalling and pore pressure in HPC at high temperatures. Cement and Concrete Research. v. 30, n. 12, p. 1915-1927, 2000. 30(2000), 1915–1927.
12. Kanagaraj, B., Anand, N., Raj R, S., & Lubloy, E. (2022). Performance evaluation of sodium silicate waste as a replacement for conventional sand in geopolymer concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 375(May), 134172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134172
13. Khoury, G. A. (2000). Effect of fire on concrete and concrete structures. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 2(4), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.51
14. Kovalchuk, G., & Krivenko, P. V. (2009). Producing fire-and heat-resistant geopolymers. In Structures, Processing, Properties and Industrial Applications (pp. 227–266). Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84569-449-4.50012-6
15. Lahoti, M., Tan, K. H., & Yang, E. H. (2019). A critical review of geopolymer properties for structural fire-resistance applications. Construction and Building Materials, 221, 514–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.076
16. Luhar, S., Nicolaides, D., & Luhar, I. (2021). Fire resistance behaviour of geopolymer concrete: An overview. In Buildings (Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 1–30). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11030082
17. Mahmud, H. I., Raju, M. K. B., & Hosen, M. L. (2021). The Effect of Fire on the Strength of Concrete Material. Journal of Engineering Science, 12(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.3329/jes.v12i1.53103
18. Provis, J. L., & Bernal, S. A. (2014). Geopolymers and related alkali-activated materials. Annual Review of Materials Research, 44, 299–327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113515 Robayo-Salazar, R. A., Rivera, J. F., & Mejía de Gutiérrez, R. (2017). Alkali-activated building materials made with recycled construction and demolition wastes. Construction and Building Materials, 149, 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.122
19. Samadi, M., Wong, L. S., Murali, G., Lim, N. H. A. S., & Ayeni, I. S. (2024). Influence of elevated temperatures on the mechanical behavior of one-part coal ash geopolymer concrete with sodium metasilicate pentahydrate and sodium metasilicate anhydrous as alkaline activators. Journal of Building Engineering, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109692
20. Sarıdemir, M., & Çelikten, S. (2022). Effect of high temperature, acid and sulfate on properties of alkali-activated lightweight aggregate concretes. Construction and Building Materials, 317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125886
21. Shi, C., Krivenko, Pavel, V., & Roy, D. (2005). Alkali-Activated Cements and Concretes. Taylor & Francis.
22. Sun, Z., Cui, H., An, H., Tao, D., Xu, Y., Zhai, J., & Li, Q. (2013). Synthesis and thermal behavior of geopolymer-type material from waste ceramic. Construction and Building Materials, 49, 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.063
23. Ulugöl, H., Kul, A., Yıldırım, G., Sahmaran, M., Aldemir, A., Figueira, D., & Ashour, A. (2021). Mechanical and microstructural characterization of geopolymers from assorted construction and demolition waste-based masonry and glass. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124358
24. Wang, J., Chen, X., Li, C., Zhou, Z., Du, P., & Zhang, X. (2023). Evaluating the effect of kaliophilite on the fire resistance of geopolymer concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106975
25. Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Jiang, S., Wang, C., & Ma, Z. (2024). Characterization of geopolymer with 100 % thermoactivated construction spoil powder: Effects of alkali dosage, silicate modulus and curing temperature. Journal of Building Engineering, 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111511