Monetizing Stranded Gas: Economic Analysis of Gas to Liquid Technologies in Nigeria

Year 2025, Volume: 20 Issue: 1, 38 - 55

Sunday Agbons Igbinere , Marvellous Eka

Abstract

Nigeria, as a nation endowed with vast reserves of stranded hydrocarbon resources and she is faced with the challenge of monetizing these resources, which are often flared due to lack of appropriate infrastructures for utilization. This has led the country into exploring different innovative approaches to unlock the economic potential of these resources. Gas-to-Liquid (GTL) technology has been seen as one of the major technologies that provide answers that can assist the country to grow in its economy. This study delves into the economic analysis of Gas-to-Liquids (GTL) technologies to monetize stranded hydrocarbon reserves in Nigeria. The economic analysis of the GTL technologies in Nigeria was done taking the Fischer-Tropsch GTL (FT-GTL) plant in Niger Delta as a case study. It was economically evaluated for a plant capacity of 1,000 MMSCF/D of natural gas. This plant is primarily affected by the crude oil price. The major aspect of this economic analysis was done by using a Microsoft Excel template developed for this study. The template considered the various variables that affect the variability of the projects such as plant life, construction period, capital expenditure, tax, operating expenditure, depreciation schedules, etc. The economic model used four economic indicators namely net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), profitability index (PI) and payback period (PP) to analyze both projects in this study. The financial and economic analysis of each indicator was carried out using the technique of discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis. DCF analysis yielded project performance criteria such as net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR), which were obtained from the projects' cash flow under consideration. Sensitivity analyses were then carried out with different tornado plots by varying the values of some of the economic parameters and determining their impacts on the project performance criteria within predetermined ranges. The results revealed that the higher the CAPEX for each of the cases, the lower the NPV and hence the profitability of the project is seen. For GTL technology to be viable as a project and profitable, the CAPEX is a factor to be extensively considered and reviewed periodically to ensure that it is not unreasonably high. Furthermore, the results of the economic analysis obtained at the different case scenarios using the most likely values of the economic input parameters indicate that FT-GTL profitability is highly dependent on the crude oil price, capital expenditure (CAPEX), operating expenditure (OPEX) and discounting factors should each be given proper considerations and review before embarking on future GTL projects. Increased operating expenditures from the FT-GTL technology reduced the NPV and IRR thereby affecting project profitability and extending the payback period, increasing the time to recoup initial investments of the FT-GTL technology plant.

Keywords

Fischer-Tropsch, Gas-to-Liquid, CAPEX, OPEX, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Stranded Hydrocarbon

Ethical Statement

Intellectual property

Supporting Institution

University of Benin

Thanks

Thanks

References

• Ahmed MM, Bello AA, Idris MN, (2012), Natural Gas Utilization and the Nigerian Gas-To-Liquid Project; An Opportunity to End Gas Flaring, Int. Emer. Trends Engin. & Dev., 2(2). 240-256. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285736728_Natural_gas_utilization_and_the_Nigerian_gas-to-liquid_project_an_opportunity_to_end_gas_flaring
• Akpomera E, Oghenekevwe O, (2017), Economic Assessment of Gas to Liquid (GTL) Technology in Nigeria. J. Natural Sci. Res., 7(22). 8-18.
• Al-Saadoon FT, (2005) Economics of GTL Plants. SPE 94380 Paper Presented at the SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium in April 3-5 2005, Dallas, Texas, USA, Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/94380-MS
• Al-Shalchi W, (2006), Gas to Liquids Technology (GTL) Petroleum Expert, Baghdad 2006, https://pdfroom.com/books/gas-to-liquids-technology-2006/jb5qOBWBgxQ/download Capuano L, (2018) Annual Energy Outlook 2018, U.S. Energy Information Administration, Independent Statistics and Analysis, www.eia.gov
• Chikwe AO, Ukpai UCE, Elechi DU, Onyia OS, (2021) Comparative Economic Analysis of Liquefied Natural Gas Technology and Gas to Liquid Technology, Europ. J. Adv. Engin. & Tech., 8(10), 9-16. https://www.ijser.org/researchpaper/Comparative-Economic-Analysis-of-Gas-to-Liquid-and-Liquefied-Natural-Gas-Technologies.pdf
• Diugwu IA, Ikaiya MA, Musa M, Egila AE, (2013), The Effect of Gas Production, Utilization and Flaring on the Economic Growth of Nigeria. Natural Resour J., 4. 341–348. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/
• Dodaro J, (2015) Fischer-Tropsch Process. Submitted as Coursework for PH240, Stanford University. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2010/ph240/liu1/
• Economides MJ, Aguirre M , Morales A , Naha S , Tijani H, Vargas L, (2005) The Economics of Gas to Liquids Compared to Liquefied Natural Gas, World Energy, 8(1). 136-140. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/3053156/Yaz%25C4%25B1r.pdf? sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• Glebova O, (2013) Gas to Liquids: Historical Development and Future Prospects: The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, University of Oxford, 1–47 https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:574a2d88-61ee-4097-8642-f154e7bbf813
• Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership. (2018), World Bank. GGFR Technology Overview – Utilization of Small-Scale Associated Gas. https://pubdocs.worldbank.org/ en/495311492808037862/GGFR-Technology-Overview-April-2017.pdf
• Gradassi JM, (2001) Gas-To-Liquid R & D: Setting Cost Reduction Targets, Elsevier Science B.V, p 7. https://www.ijser.org/researchpaper/Comparative-Economic-Analysis-of-Gas-to-Liquid-and-Liquefied-Natural-Gas-Technologies.pdf
• Hendrix C, Au T, (2003) Project Management for Construction: Fundamental Concepts for Owners, Engineers, Architects and Builders. Retrieved on January 15 2007 from www.ce.cmu.edulpmbooklO5 cost estimation.html. https://books.google.com.tr/books? id=N5mVq8GrT0kC&printsec=frontcover&hl=tr
• Idigbe KI, Onwuachi-Iheagwara PN, (2014) Driving Sustainable Growth through Natural Gas Assets in Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JETEAS) 5(2). 140-147. https://www.scholarlinkinstitute.org/jeteas/listofissues.php
• Ikoku, Chi I. (1992), Natural Gas Production Engineering, Book, Reprint Edition. Krieger Publishing Company, Krieger Drive, Malabar, Florida 32950, 1–17. https://www.amazon.com/Natural-Gas-Production-Engineering-Ikoku/dp/0894646397
• International Energy Agency, The World Energy Out-look, (2009). Kerzner, H. (2001), Project Management: A System Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. 7th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, USA. p.952 https://ftp.idu.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/ebook/ip/BUKU%20MANAJEMEN%20PROYEK/project-management-harold-kerzner1.pdf
• Mian MA, (2010) Project Economics and Decision Analysis (2nd Edition, Volume 1), PennWell Corporation, Tulsa, Oklahoma. https://www.amazon.in/Project-Economics-Decision-Analysis-Determinisitic/dp/1593702086
• Nagi CA, Dulu A, Godwin C, (2016), Comparative Economic Analysis of Gas to Liquid and Liquefied Natural Gas Technologies, Int. J. Sci. & Engin. Res., 7(6). 258 – 275, ISSN 2229-5518 https://ejaet.com/PDF/8-10/EJAET-8-10-9-16.pdf
• Nwankwo JE, (2008) Gas Utilization in Nigeria - an Economic Comparison of Gas-to-Liquid and Liquefied Natural Gas Technologies, M.Sc. Thesis, North-West University, South Africa. https://www.connecting-africa.net/query_2.php?rid=B00009605
• Nwaoha C, Iyoke UJ, (2013) A Review on Natural Gas Utilization and Cutting Carbon Emissions: How Viable is Compressed Natural Gas for Road Vehicle Fuel?, J. Energy Tech. & Policy, 3(5). 37-46. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JETP/article/download/5596/5708
• Onyelucheya OE, Ibe EC, (2015) Profitability Challenge of the Excravous GTL Plant. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference of NSChE, 5th- 7th Nov., 2015, Warri, Nigeria. P019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335608733_Profitability_Challenges_of_the_Escravos_GTL_Plant
• Oredein O, (2013) Hopes of Monetizing GTL Resources in Nigeria are again Delayed. Special E&P, Hart Energy, January 22, 2013, https://www.hartenergy.com/exclusves/hopes-monetizing-gtl-resources-nigeria-are-again-delayed-19219.
• Patel B, (2005) Gas Monetization: A Techno-Economic Comparison of Gas-to-Liquid and LNG, Foster Wheeler Energy Ltd, Reading UK, Paper Presented at the 7th World Congress of Chemical Engineers in Glasgow, 1-11. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/246518/1/978-1-907555-74-9.pdf
• Smith R, Asaro M, (2005), Fuels of the Future: Technology Intelligence for Gas to Liquids Strategies. SRI Consulting, Menlo Park. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_72
• Stanley IO, (2009) Gas to Liquid Technology: Prospect for Natural Gas Utilization in Nigeria, Elsevier, J. Nat. Gas Sci. & Engin., 1(6). 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2009.12.001
• Toochukwu, E. S., Chinedu, I. N., Ubanozie, O. J., Kerunwa, A., Ohia, N. P., Odo, J. E. and Obah, B. (2019), Economics of Gas-to-Liquids (GTL) Plants, Petroleum Science and Engineering, 3(2). 85-93, doi.10.11648/j.pse.20190302.17
• Ubanzie JO, Toochukwu ES, Abanobi CI, Eluagu RC, Igbojionu AC, (2021) Evaluation of the Economic Potentials of a Mini Gas-to-Liquid (GTL) Plant in Nigeria. Int. J. Oil, Gas & Coal Engin., 9(6). 98-110, doi.10.11648/j.ogce.20210906.13
• Uzuegbunam F, (2014), Escravous GTL Project Finally Gets off Ground, Accessed at https://archive.businessday.ng/oilandgas/article/chevrons-escravos-gtl-project-finally-gets-off-ground/