Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE SPATIAL PRACTICES OF COLONIAL GOVERNMENTS

Year 2021, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 166 - 177, 22.12.2021

Abstract

Seoul, as one of Asia's most developed metropolitan city, experienced colonization and modern urbanization practices at the same time under the Japanese colonial government for about 35 years, and its built environment had undergone serious physical and symbolic changes in this process. The imperialist countries legitimize their existence through carrying their spatial practices to the colonial countries. Today, it is not difficult to trace the impacts of this period in the skyline of Seoul city, in its urban layers. This article, which will try to understand and reveal the urban practices of Japan while rebuilding the city of Seoul in line with its own ideals during this period through urban planning decisions, also aims to discuss the process of transforming Seoul into a Japanese Empire’s showcase through urban spatial practices.

References

  • Bae, S. H. & Lee, G. J. (2017). A Study of the Use of the Gwanghwamun Square through the Evolution of the City Structure of Seoul, UIA 2017 Seoul World Architects Congress, http://www.uia2017seoul.org/P/papers/Full_paper/Paper/Poster/P-0401.pdf
  • Caprio, M. E. (2009). Japanese Assimilation Policies in Colonial Korea, 1910–1945. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Chung, K. (1994) Kwanghwamun eso Namdaemun kaji (From the Kwangwha Gate to the South Gate), Munhwa kwahak, Volume 5, p. 45–64.
  • Cumings, B. (1981) The Origins of the Korean War: Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes, 1945–1947 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981),
  • Cumings, B. (1997). Korea's Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Grayson, J. H. (1993). Christianity and State Shinto in Colonial Korea: A Clash of Nationalisms and Religious Beliefs. Diskus. British Association for the Study of Religions. 1 (2): 13–30.
  • Gragert, Edwin H. 1994. Landownership under Colonial Rule: Korea’s Japanese Experience, 1900–1935. Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press.
  • Goto, Y. (1993). A Historical Study on the Construction of Street Network in "KEIJO", (SEOUL at Present) 【土木史研究 第13号1993年6月 審査付論文】,
  • Han, J. S. (2014). Japan in the public culture of South Korea, 1945–2000s: The making and remaking of colonial sites and memories, The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Volume 12 | Issue 15 | Number 2 | Article ID 4107 | Apr 13, 2014
  • Hashiya, H. (2004). Teikoku nihon to shokuminchi toshi (The Japanese empire and colonial cities). Tokyo:Yoshikawa Kobunkan
  • Hong, S. M. (2010). Woorigunggwol Iyagi [The Story of Our Palace]. 20th ed. Paju: Cheongnyeonsa.
  • Horvath, R.J. (1972). In Search of A Theory of Urbanization: Notes on The Colonial City, East Lake Geographer 5, pp. 69 -82, p. 76
  • Jacobs, J. (1996). Edge of Empire: Postcolonialism and the City. s.l.:Routledge.
  • Jung, I. (2014). Architecture and Urbanism in Modern Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Kendall, L. (2008). Shamans, Nostalgias, and the IMF: South Korean Popular Religion in Motion (Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press, 2009).
  • Kim, H. R. (1994). A Study on the Style of the Traditional City of Seoul, The Journal of Seoul Studies 3.
  • Kim, S. (1997). The Shinto Shrine Issue in Korean Christianity under Japanese Colonialism, Journal of Church and State, Issue 39, p. 503–521.
  • Kim, J.-S. (1999). Hyeondaeseongui hyeongseong, Seoule dancehalleul heohara (Formation of the Korean modern—Allow a dancehall in Seoul). Seoul: Hyeonsil munhwa yeongu.
  • Kim, K. J. (2012). The study of urban form in South Korea, Urban Morphology (2012) 16(2), 149-64 © International Seminar on Urban Form, 2012 ISSN 1027-4278
  • Kim, H.M. ve Han, S.S. (2011). Seoul, doi:10.1016/j.cities.2011.02.003
  • Kim, M. S. (2016). Assimilating Seoul: Japanese Rule and the Politics of Public Space in Colonial Korea, 1910–1945. The Journal of Japanese Studies, 42(2), pp. 444-449.
  • Lee, H. K., 2019. ‘Difficult Heritage’ in Nation Building South Korea and Post-Conflict Japanese Colonial Occupation Architecture. Cambridge, UK: Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities (CRASSH) University of Cambridge.
  • Lee, Y., 2020. Taipei and Seoul’s Modern Urbanization under Japanese Colonial Rule: A Comparative Study from the Present-Day Context, Sustainability, 12(11)( 4772), pp. 1-24.
  • Nakajima, M. (2016). Shinto Deities That Crossed the Sea: Japan's "Overseas Shrines," 1868 to 1945", Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. JSTOR 27822898. , 37 ((1)), p. 21–46.
  • Pratt, M. L. (1992) Imperial Eyes:Travel Writing and Transculturation. Routledge, 1992.
  • Pratt, K. (2007). Everlasting Flower: A History of Korea. Published by Reaktion Books Ltd. Great Sutton Street, London
  • Todd H. A. (2005). Sanitizing Empire: Japanese Articulations of Korean Otherness and the Construction of Early Colonial Seoul, 1905-1919, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 64, No. 3 (Aug., 2005), pp. 639-675.
  • Todd H. A. (2008). Respatializing Choson’s Royal Capital: The Politics of Japanese Urban Reforms in Early Colonial Seoul, 1905–1919, In Sitings: Critical Approaches to Korean Geography, edited by Timothy R. Tangherlini and Sallie Yea, 15–38. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press and Centre for Korean Studies.
  • Todd, H. A. (2014). Assimilating Seoul: Japanese rule and the politics of public space in colonial Korea, 1910- 1945. Berkeley: University of California Press..
  • Valat, J. (2014). Seoul / How the Japanese occupation shaped the city of Seoul – Development inequalities. [Online] Available at: https://fac.arch.hku.hk/asian-cities-research/seoul-how-the-japanese-occupation-shaped- the-city-of-seoul-development-inequalities/ on [Accessed 09.02. 2021].
  • Yeoh, B. (1996). Contesting Space: Power Relations and the Urban Built Environment in Colonial Singapore. s.l.:Oxford University Press..
  • Yi, T. J. (1999) Seoul at the beginning of the 20th century: Urban development based on Western models, Korea Journal 34(3): 95 –121.
  • Yoon, H. (2006). The Culture of Fengshui in Korea: An Exploration of East Asian Geomancy. s.l.:Lexington Books..
  • Yoon, H. (2017) P’ungsu A Study of Geomancy in Korea, State University of New York Press, Albany

SÖMÜRGE YÖNETİMLERİN MEKÂNSAL PRATİKLERİ

Year 2021, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 166 - 177, 22.12.2021

Abstract

Seul, Asya’nın en gelişmiş metropollerinden biri olarak, Japon sömürgesi altında yaklaşık 35 yıl sömürgeleştirme ve modern kentleşme pratiklerini aynı anda deneyimlemiş, yapılı çevresi fiziksel ve sembolik olarak bu süreçte çok ciddi değişimler geçirmiştir. Bunda Emperyalist ülkelerin, mekânsal pratiklerini sömürge ülkelerine taşımak suretiyle o ülkelerdeki varlıklarını meşrulaştırma eğilimleri etkili olmuştur. Günümüzde Seul kentinin siluetinde, kentsel katmanlarında hala bu dönemin izlerini sürmek hiç de zor değildir. Bu dönem Japonya’nın Seul kentini kendi idealleri doğrultusunda yeniden inşa edişindeki kentsel pratikleri ve bu pratikleri ortaya koyan planlama kararlarını anlamaya çalışacak olan bu makale, aynı zamanda kentsel mekânsal pratiklerle Seul’un Japon İmparatorluğunun bir gösteri mekânı haline getirilmesi sürecini tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır.

References

  • Bae, S. H. & Lee, G. J. (2017). A Study of the Use of the Gwanghwamun Square through the Evolution of the City Structure of Seoul, UIA 2017 Seoul World Architects Congress, http://www.uia2017seoul.org/P/papers/Full_paper/Paper/Poster/P-0401.pdf
  • Caprio, M. E. (2009). Japanese Assimilation Policies in Colonial Korea, 1910–1945. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Chung, K. (1994) Kwanghwamun eso Namdaemun kaji (From the Kwangwha Gate to the South Gate), Munhwa kwahak, Volume 5, p. 45–64.
  • Cumings, B. (1981) The Origins of the Korean War: Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes, 1945–1947 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981),
  • Cumings, B. (1997). Korea's Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Grayson, J. H. (1993). Christianity and State Shinto in Colonial Korea: A Clash of Nationalisms and Religious Beliefs. Diskus. British Association for the Study of Religions. 1 (2): 13–30.
  • Gragert, Edwin H. 1994. Landownership under Colonial Rule: Korea’s Japanese Experience, 1900–1935. Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press.
  • Goto, Y. (1993). A Historical Study on the Construction of Street Network in "KEIJO", (SEOUL at Present) 【土木史研究 第13号1993年6月 審査付論文】,
  • Han, J. S. (2014). Japan in the public culture of South Korea, 1945–2000s: The making and remaking of colonial sites and memories, The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Volume 12 | Issue 15 | Number 2 | Article ID 4107 | Apr 13, 2014
  • Hashiya, H. (2004). Teikoku nihon to shokuminchi toshi (The Japanese empire and colonial cities). Tokyo:Yoshikawa Kobunkan
  • Hong, S. M. (2010). Woorigunggwol Iyagi [The Story of Our Palace]. 20th ed. Paju: Cheongnyeonsa.
  • Horvath, R.J. (1972). In Search of A Theory of Urbanization: Notes on The Colonial City, East Lake Geographer 5, pp. 69 -82, p. 76
  • Jacobs, J. (1996). Edge of Empire: Postcolonialism and the City. s.l.:Routledge.
  • Jung, I. (2014). Architecture and Urbanism in Modern Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Kendall, L. (2008). Shamans, Nostalgias, and the IMF: South Korean Popular Religion in Motion (Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press, 2009).
  • Kim, H. R. (1994). A Study on the Style of the Traditional City of Seoul, The Journal of Seoul Studies 3.
  • Kim, S. (1997). The Shinto Shrine Issue in Korean Christianity under Japanese Colonialism, Journal of Church and State, Issue 39, p. 503–521.
  • Kim, J.-S. (1999). Hyeondaeseongui hyeongseong, Seoule dancehalleul heohara (Formation of the Korean modern—Allow a dancehall in Seoul). Seoul: Hyeonsil munhwa yeongu.
  • Kim, K. J. (2012). The study of urban form in South Korea, Urban Morphology (2012) 16(2), 149-64 © International Seminar on Urban Form, 2012 ISSN 1027-4278
  • Kim, H.M. ve Han, S.S. (2011). Seoul, doi:10.1016/j.cities.2011.02.003
  • Kim, M. S. (2016). Assimilating Seoul: Japanese Rule and the Politics of Public Space in Colonial Korea, 1910–1945. The Journal of Japanese Studies, 42(2), pp. 444-449.
  • Lee, H. K., 2019. ‘Difficult Heritage’ in Nation Building South Korea and Post-Conflict Japanese Colonial Occupation Architecture. Cambridge, UK: Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities (CRASSH) University of Cambridge.
  • Lee, Y., 2020. Taipei and Seoul’s Modern Urbanization under Japanese Colonial Rule: A Comparative Study from the Present-Day Context, Sustainability, 12(11)( 4772), pp. 1-24.
  • Nakajima, M. (2016). Shinto Deities That Crossed the Sea: Japan's "Overseas Shrines," 1868 to 1945", Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. JSTOR 27822898. , 37 ((1)), p. 21–46.
  • Pratt, M. L. (1992) Imperial Eyes:Travel Writing and Transculturation. Routledge, 1992.
  • Pratt, K. (2007). Everlasting Flower: A History of Korea. Published by Reaktion Books Ltd. Great Sutton Street, London
  • Todd H. A. (2005). Sanitizing Empire: Japanese Articulations of Korean Otherness and the Construction of Early Colonial Seoul, 1905-1919, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 64, No. 3 (Aug., 2005), pp. 639-675.
  • Todd H. A. (2008). Respatializing Choson’s Royal Capital: The Politics of Japanese Urban Reforms in Early Colonial Seoul, 1905–1919, In Sitings: Critical Approaches to Korean Geography, edited by Timothy R. Tangherlini and Sallie Yea, 15–38. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press and Centre for Korean Studies.
  • Todd, H. A. (2014). Assimilating Seoul: Japanese rule and the politics of public space in colonial Korea, 1910- 1945. Berkeley: University of California Press..
  • Valat, J. (2014). Seoul / How the Japanese occupation shaped the city of Seoul – Development inequalities. [Online] Available at: https://fac.arch.hku.hk/asian-cities-research/seoul-how-the-japanese-occupation-shaped- the-city-of-seoul-development-inequalities/ on [Accessed 09.02. 2021].
  • Yeoh, B. (1996). Contesting Space: Power Relations and the Urban Built Environment in Colonial Singapore. s.l.:Oxford University Press..
  • Yi, T. J. (1999) Seoul at the beginning of the 20th century: Urban development based on Western models, Korea Journal 34(3): 95 –121.
  • Yoon, H. (2006). The Culture of Fengshui in Korea: An Exploration of East Asian Geomancy. s.l.:Lexington Books..
  • Yoon, H. (2017) P’ungsu A Study of Geomancy in Korea, State University of New York Press, Albany
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Esengul Danısan 0000-0003-4143-3104

Publication Date December 22, 2021
Acceptance Date December 10, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Danısan, E. (2021). SÖMÜRGE YÖNETİMLERİN MEKÂNSAL PRATİKLERİ. Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives, 9(2), 166-177.
AMA Danısan E. SÖMÜRGE YÖNETİMLERİN MEKÂNSAL PRATİKLERİ. Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives. December 2021;9(2):166-177.
Chicago Danısan, Esengul. “SÖMÜRGE YÖNETİMLERİN MEKÂNSAL PRATİKLERİ”. Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives 9, no. 2 (December 2021): 166-77.
EndNote Danısan E (December 1, 2021) SÖMÜRGE YÖNETİMLERİN MEKÂNSAL PRATİKLERİ. Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives 9 2 166–177.
IEEE E. Danısan, “SÖMÜRGE YÖNETİMLERİN MEKÂNSAL PRATİKLERİ”, Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 166–177, 2021.
ISNAD Danısan, Esengul. “SÖMÜRGE YÖNETİMLERİN MEKÂNSAL PRATİKLERİ”. Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives 9/2 (December 2021), 166-177.
JAMA Danısan E. SÖMÜRGE YÖNETİMLERİN MEKÂNSAL PRATİKLERİ. Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives. 2021;9:166–177.
MLA Danısan, Esengul. “SÖMÜRGE YÖNETİMLERİN MEKÂNSAL PRATİKLERİ”. Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives, vol. 9, no. 2, 2021, pp. 166-77.
Vancouver Danısan E. SÖMÜRGE YÖNETİMLERİN MEKÂNSAL PRATİKLERİ. Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives. 2021;9(2):166-77.