AB'nin Yeni Paktının Göç Diplomasisi Üzerindeki Etkisi

Year 2024, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 53 - 63, 30.12.2024

Nur Seda Temur

https://doi.org/10.62425/jirs.1578838

Abstract

Avrupa Birliği'nin 23 Eylül 2020 tarihinde Göç ve İltica Konusunda Yeni Pakt'ı hayata geçirmesiyle birlikte, birçok kişi AB üye devletlerinin dış politikalarında bazı değişiklikler bekliyordu. Bu bağlamda göç diplomasisi de bir istisna değildi. Bu çıkarımla ilgili olarak, bu makale aşağıdaki soruyu inceleyecektir: AB'nin Yeni Göç ve İltica Paktı göç diplomasisini nasıl etkileyecek? Bu soruyla ilgili olarak, bu makalede, Yeni Pakt'ın AB üye devletleri arasındaki karşılıklı bağımlılığı güçlendirmesine rağmen, AB üye devletlerine yönelik göçün karmaşıklaşacağı ve bunun da göç alan, göç veren veya transit devletler arasında göç diplomasisinin önemini artıracağı fikrini savunmaya çalışacağım. Bu iddiadan hareketle, giriş bölümünün ardından, bu araştırma makalesi ilk olarak göç diplomasisi kavramına ve kavramın realist teorik çerçeveden tartışılmasına odaklanacaktır. Ardından, AB'nin Yeni Göç ve İltica Paktı incelenecek ve 2008 AB Göç ve İltica Paktı ile karşılaştırması yapılacaktır. Sonuç bölümünden önce, Yeni Pakt'ın göç diplomasisi üzerindeki etkisi tartışılacaktır. Sonuç bölümünde ise genel bir değerlendirme yapılacaktır. Bu araştırma makalesi nitel bir çalışma olacaktır. Özellikle, Yeni Göç ve İltica Paktı'nda alınan kararlara ilişkin veriler, belge analizi yoluyla hem birincil hem de ikincil kaynaklardan toplanacaktır.

Keywords

Göç Diplomasisi, AB, Göç, İltica

The Impact of EU’s New Pact on Migration Diplomacy

Abstract

As the European Union launched its New Pact on Migration and Asylum on 23 September 2020, many anticipated certain changes in foreign policies of EU member states. Within this context, migration diplomacy was not the exception. Regarding this inference, this article will examine the following question: How will the EU’s New Pact on Migration and Asylum impact migration diplomacy? Concerning this question, in this article, I will try to defend the idea that although the New Pact strengthens the interdependency between EU member states, immigration towards EU member states will be complicated, which will raise the importance of migration diplomacy among migration-receiving, migration-sending, or transit states. With respect to this claim, after the introduction part, this research paper will first focus on the concept of migration diplomacy, and the discussion of the term from realist theoretical framework. After this, the EU’s New Pact on Migration and Asylum will be examined, and its comparison with the 2008 EU’s Pact on Migration and Asylum will be made. Before the concluding remark, the impact of the New Pact on migration diplomacy will be discussed. In the conclusion part, an overall evaluation will be made. This research paper will be a qualitative study. In particular, the data about decision taken in the New Pact on Migration and Asylum will be gathered from both primary and secondary resources through document analysis.

Keywords

Keywords: Migration Diplomacy, EU’s New Pact, Migration, Asylum

References

• References Adamson, F. B., & Tsourapas, G. (2019). Migration diplomacy in world politics. International Studies Perspectives, 20(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/eky015
• Cooper, A. F., Jorge, H., & Thakur, R. (2013). Introduction: The challenges of 21st-century diplomacy. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy (pp. 1–31). Oxford University Press.
• European Commission. (2020, September 23). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a new pact on migration and asylum, COM (2020) 609 final. Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/1_en_act_part1_v7_1.pdf
• European Commission. (2008, September 24). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a new pact on migration and asylum, COM (2008) 13440/08 ASIM 68. Brussels. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13440-2008-INIT/en/pdf
• European Council on Refugees and Exiles. (2021). ECRE comments on the regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on asylum and migration management, amending regulations (EU) 2021/1147 and (EU) 2021/1060 and repealing regulation (EU) No 604/2013. https://ecre.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ECRE_Comments_Asylum-and-Migration-Management-Regulation.pdf
• European Pact on Immigration and Asylum. (2008). Council of the European Union. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13440-2008-INIT/en/pdf
• Greenhill, K. M. (2010). Weapons of mass migration: Forced displacement, coercion, and foreign policy. Cornell Studies in Security Affairs. Cornell University Press.
• Hadj-Abdou, L. (2021). From the migration crisis to the new pact on migration and asylum: The status quo problem. BRIDGE Network Working Paper, 11, 1–15.
• Hamilton, K., & Langhorne, R. (2011). The practice of diplomacy: Its evolution, theory, and administration (2nd ed.). Routledge.
• İçduygu, A., & Aksel, D. B. (2014). Two-to-tango in migration diplomacy: Negotiating readmission agreement between the EU and Turkey. European Journal of Migration and Law, 16, 336–362.
• İçduygu, A., & Üstübici, A. (2014). Negotiating mobility, debating borders: Migration diplomacy in Turkey–EU relations. In H. Schwenken & S. Russ-Sattar (Eds.), New border and citizenship politics (pp. 44–60). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Jegen, L., Claes, J., & Cham, O. N. (2020). Towards mutually beneficial EU-West African migration cooperation?: Assessing EU policy trends and their implications for migration cooperation. Clingendael Institute, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/resrep27539
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence (4th ed.). Longman.
• Kirişçi, K., Erdoğan, M. M., & Eminoğlu, N. (2020). The EU’s “new pact on migration and asylum” is missing a true foundation. Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-eus-new-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-is-missing-a-truefoundation/
• Koinova, M. (2011). Diasporas and secessionist conflicts: The mobilization of the Armenian, Albanian, and Chechen diasporas. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34, 333–356.
• Koinova, M. (2018). Sending states and diaspora positionality in international relations. International Political Sociology, 12, 190–210.
• Koinova, M., & Tsourapas, G. (2018). How do countries of origin engage migrants and diasporas? Multiple actors and comparative perspectives. International Political Science Review, 39, 311–321.
• Norman, K. P. (2020). Migration diplomacy and policy liberalization in Morocco and Turkey. International Migration Review, 54(4), 1158–1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319895271
• Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.
• Oyen, M. (2015). The diplomacy of migration: Transnational lives and the making of US-Chinese relations in the Cold War. Cornell University Press.
• Powell, R. (1991). Absolute and relative gains in international relations theory. American Political Science Review, 85, 1303–1320.
• Romeo, G. (2021). The new pact on migration and asylum: The global impact. Brussels: Euro Med Rights.
• Schwenken, H., & Russ-Sattar, S. (Eds.). (2014). New border and citizenship politics (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Spijkerboer, T. (2021). ‘I wish there was a treaty we could sign.’ In S. Carrera & A. Geddes (Eds.), The EU pact on migration and asylum in light of the United Nations global compact on refugees (pp. 61–71). European University Institute.
• Şeker Aydın, G. (2022). Suriye Savaşı’nda Avrupa Birliği (AB)’nin mülteci ve sığınmacı siyaseti. Liberal Düşünce Dergisi, 105, 107–134. https://doi.org/10.36484/liberal.100926463
• Teitelbaum, M. S. (1984). Immigration, refugees, and foreign policy. International Organization, 38(3), 429–450.
• Thiollet, H. (2011). Migration as diplomacy: Labor migrants, refugees, and Arab regional politics in the oil-rich countries. International Labor and Working-Class History, 79(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0147547910000293
• Tollison, R. D., & Thomas, D. W. (1979). An economic theory of mutually advantageous issue linkages in international negotiations. International Organization, 33, 425–449.
• Tsourapas, G. (2017). Migration diplomacy in the Global South: Cooperation, coercion, and issue linkage in Gaddafi’s Libya. Third World Quarterly, 38(10), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1350102
• Voet, L. (2021). EU migration and asylum pact abandons compassion and human rights. Social Europe. https://www.socialeurope.eu/eu-migration-and-asylum-pact-abandons-compassion-and-human-rights
• Vosyliūtė, L. (2021). When principles are compromised: EU return sponsorship in light of the UN global compacts. In S. Carrera & A. Geddes (Eds.), The EU pact on migration and asylum in light of the United Nations global compact on refugees (pp. 291–314). European University Institute.
• Weiner, M. (1992). Security, stability, and international migration. International Security, 17(3), 91–126.