Mikromobilitenin Akıllı Şehirlere Entegrasyonunu Etkileyen Faktörler ve Şehir İçi Ulaşıma Etkileri

Abstract

Geleceğin ulaşımında, akıllı şehirlerin gelişimi ve mikromobilite araçlarının kullanımı, sürdürülebilirlik ve verimlilik açısından önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Elektrikli scooter, bisiklet ve e-moped gibi mikromobilite araçları, şehir içi ulaşımda önemli bir alternatif sunarak çevresel, ekonomik ve toplumsal faydalar sağlamaktadır. Ancak, bu araçların başarılı entegrasyonu için birçok faktörün dikkate alınması gerekmektedir. Bu makalenin amacı, mikromobilite araçlarının şehir içi ulaşım sistemlerine entegrasyonunu etkileyen temel faktörleri analiz etmektir. Makalede, mikromobilite araçlarının entegrasyonunu şekillendiren 6 ana kriter altında 9 alt kriter ele alınmış ve bu kriterler arasındaki ilişkiler DEMATEL yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, mikromobilite araçlarıyla ilgili kriterlerin önem sıralaması şu şekilde belirlenmiştir: mikromobilite araçları için ayrılmış yollar, mikromobilite araçlarının toplu taşıma ile entegrasyonu, kazalar, mevzuat eksiklikleri, ışıklandırma ve işaretlendirmeler, mikromobilite araçlara erişilebilirlik, dijital okuryazarlık seviyesi mikromobilite araçlarının çevresel sürdürülebilirliğe etkileri ve yakıt maliyetidir. Çalışma, mikromobilite araçlarının şehir içi ulaşım üzerindeki etkilerini daha iyi anlamaya ve entegrasyon sürecinde dikkate alınması gereken önemli faktörleri belirlemeye yönelik önemli bir katkı sunmaktadır.

Keywords

• Mikromobilite araçlar
• akıllı şehirler
• DEMATEL yöntemi

Factors Affecting the Integration of Micromobility into Smart Cities and Effects on Urban Transport

Abstract

In the transport of the future, the development of smart cities and the use of micromobility vehicles play an important role in terms of sustainability and efficiency. Micromobility vehicles such as electric scooters, bicycles and e-mopeds provide environmental, economic and social benefits by offering an important alternative in urban transport. However, many factors need to be considered for the successful integration of these vehicles. The aim of this paper is to analyse the main factors affecting the integration of micromobility vehicles into urban transport systems. In this paper, 9 sub-criteria under 6 main criteria affecting the integration of micromobility vehicles are considered and the relationships between these criteria are analysed by DEMATEL method. As a result of the analysis, the importance ranking of the criteria related to micromobility vehicles is determined as follows: roads reserved for micromobility vehicles, integration of micromobility vehicles with public transport, accidents, legislation deficiencies, lighting and signing, accessibility to micromobility vehicles, digital literacy level, effects of micromobility vehicles on environmental sustainability and fuel cost. The study makes an important contribution towards better understanding the impacts of micromobility vehicles on urban transport and identifying important factors to be considered in the integration process.

Keywords

• micromobility vehicles
• smart cities
• DEMATEL method

References

1. Aguilera-García, Á., Gómez, J., Sobrino, N. (2020). Exploring the adoption of moped scooter-sharing systems in spanish urban areas. Cities, 96, 102424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102424
2. Bajec, P., Tuljak-Suban, D., & Zalokar, E. (2021). A distance-based ahp-dea super-efficiency approach for selecting an electric bike sharing system provider: one step closer to sustainability and a win–win effect for all target groups. Sustainability, 13(2), 549. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020549
3. Bylieva, D., Lobatyuk, V., & Shestakova, I. (2022). Shared micromobility: between physical and digital reality. Sustainability, 14(4), 2467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042467
4. Felipe-Falgas, P., Madrid‐López, C., Marquet, O. (2022). Assessing environmental performance of micromobility using lca and self-reported modal change: the case of shared e-bikes, e-scooters, and e-mopeds in barcelona. Sustainability, 14(7), 4139. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074139
5. Flores, P. and Jansson, J. (2021). The role of consumer innovativeness and green perceptions on green innovation use: the case of shared e‐bikes and e‐scooters. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(6), 1466-1479. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1957
6. Fonseca-Cabrera, A., Llopis-Castelló, D., Zuriaga, A., Alonso-Troyano, C., García, A. (2021). Micromobility users’ behaviour and perceived risk during meeting manoeuvres. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12465. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312465
7. Fontela, E., Gabus, A. (1974). DEMATEL, innovative methods. Report no. 2 structural analysis of the world problematique. Battelle Geneva Research Institute, 67-69.
8. Fontela, E., Gabus, A. (1976). The DEMATEL observer: Battelle Institute. Geneva Research Center, 56-61.

9. Güler, E., Avcı, S., Aladağ, Z. (2022). DEMATEL-SWARA yöntemleri ile geçisi barınma alanlarının seçimine etki eden kriterlerin değerlendirilmesi. UMUFED International Journal of Western Black Sea Engineering and Science, 4(2), 57-74.
10. Hassam, S., Alpalhão, N., Neto, M. (2024). A spatiotemporal comparative analysis of docked and dockless shared micromobility services. Smart Cities, 7(2), 880-912. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7020037
11. Jafarzadehfadaki, M. and Sisiopiku, V. (2024). Embracing urban micromobility: a comparative study of e-scooter adoption in washington, d.c., miami, and los angeles. Urban Science, 8(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8020071
12. Karpinski, E., Bayles, E., Sanders, T. (2022). Safety analysis for micromobility: recommendations on risk metrics and data collection. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2676(12), 420-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221095523
13. Koçak, A. and Diyadin, A. (2018). Sanayi 4.0 geçiş süreçlerinde kritik başarı faktörlerinin DEMATEL yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Ege academic review, 18(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2018132203
14. Li, C.W., Tzeng, G.H. (2009). Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall. Expert Systems with Applications, 36: 9891–9898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.073
15. Marques, D. and Coelho, M. (2022). A literature review of emerging research needs for micromobility—integration through a life cycle thinking approach. Future Transportation, 2(1), 135-164. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp2010008
16. McQueen, M., Abou-Zeid, G., MacArthur, J., Clifton, K. (2020). Transportation transformation: is micromobility making a macro impact on sustainability? Journal of Planning Literature, 36(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220972696
17. Moch, N. and Wereda, W. (2020). Smart security in the smart city. Sustainability, 12(23), 9900. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239900
18. Munhoz, P., Dias, F., Chinelli, C., Guedes, A., Santos, J., Silva, W., Soares, C. (2020). Smart mobility: the main drivers for increasing the intelligence of urban mobility. Sustainability, 12(24), 10675. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410675
19. Nilashi, M., Zakaria, R., Ibrahim, O., Majid, M., Zin, R., ve Farahmand, M. (2015). MCPCM: A DEMATEL-ANPBased Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate the Critical Success Factors in Construction Projects. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 40(2): 343-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1529-1
20. Pérez-Zuriaga, A., Llopis-Castelló, D., Just-Martínez, V., Fonseca-Cabrera, A., Alonso-Troyano, C., García, A. (2022). Implementation of a low-cost data acquisition system on an e-scooter for micromobility research. Sensors, 22(21), 8215. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218215
21. Rześny-Cieplińska, J., Tomaszewski, T., Piecyk-Ouellet, M., Kiba-Janiak, M. (2023). Emerging trends for urban freight transport–the potential for sustainable micromobility. Plos One, 18(9), e0289915. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289915
22. Sanjurjo-de-No, A. (2023). Factors influencing the pedestrian injury severity of micromobility crashes. Sustainability, 15(19), 14348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914348
23. Štefancová, V., Kalašová, A., Čulík, K., Mazanec, J., Vojtek, M., Masek, J. (2022). Research on the impact of covid-19 on micromobility using statistical methods. Applied Sciences, 12(16), 8128. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168128
24. Stehlin, J. and Payne, W. (2022). Disposable infrastructures: ‘micromobility’ platforms and the political economy of transport disruption in austin, texas. Urban Studies, 60(2), 274-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221091486
25. Sun, S. and Ertz, M. (2022). Can shared micromobility programs reduce greenhouse gas emissions: evidence from urban transportation big data. Sustainable Cities and Society, 85, 104045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104045
26. Tamagusko, T., Correia, M., Rita, L., Bostan, T., Peliteiro, M., Martins, R., Ferreira, A. (2023). Data-driven approach for urban micromobility enhancement through safety mapping and intelligent route planning. Smart Cities, 6(4), 2035-2056. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6040094
27. Wu W., Lee, Y. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEl method. Expert Syst. Appl., 32(2), ss. 499-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005