MİNİ İMPLANTLARIN PROTETİK KULLANIM ALANLARI VE AVANTAJLARI

Abstract

Daha çok ortodontide ankraj endikasyonu olan mini implantlar, protetik diş tedavisinde de yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Mini implantlar aşırı rezorbe olarak genişlik açısından implant uygulamasına elverişli olmayan durumlarda hastayı stabil protezlerle rahat ettirmek için kullanılabileceği gibi, sıklıkla geçici implantlar olarak da hizmet etmektedirler. Bir başka endikasyon ise iki diş arası mesafe normal boyutlardaki bir implantın yerleştirilmesine izin vermeyecek kadar dar olduğu durumlardır. Bu makalede bu farklı endikasyonlar ayrıntılı olarak anlatılmakta ve vaka örnekleri ile desteklenmektedir.

Keywords

• Mini implantlar
• aşırı rezorbe alt çene
• geçici implant
• dar diş aralığı
• iki kök arası mesafe yetersizliği

PROSTHETIC INDICATIONS AND ADVANTAGES OF MINI IMPLANTS

Abstract

Mini dental implants are often used in orthodontics for anchorage purposes. In prosthodontics small-diameter implants have nbeen advocated for specific clinical situations including reduced inter-radicular bone, a thin alveolar crest and provisional support and retention of immediate dentures. This report describes the various indications in detail and gives clinical examples of cases treated by the authors.

Keywords

• Mini implants
• severely atrophied mandibula
• provisional implant
• narrow interdental gap
• reduced interradicular bone

References

1. Zubery Y ve ark. Immediate loading of modual transitional histomorphometric study in dogs. International Journal Dentistry, 1999; 19: 343-53. histologic and of Periodontics and Restorative
2. Balkin BE, Steflik DE, Naval F. Minidental implant technique for ongoing applications. Journal of Oral Implantology, 2001; 27: 32-7.
3. Krennmair G, Weinlander M, Schidinger S. Provisional implants for anchoring removable interim prostheses in edentulous jaws: a clinical study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2003; 18: 582-88.
4. Leshem D ve ark. A simple technique for fabrication of immediate interim removable prosthesis supported by transitional implants. Implant Dentistry, 2003; 12: 227-29.
5. Stegaroiu R ve ark. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 1998; 13: 82-90.
6. Kunavisarut C ve ark. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2002; 11: 30-40.
7. Adell R ve ark. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. International Journal of Oral Surgery, 1981; 10: 387-416. 8. Lozada JL ve ark. dimensional analysis of two finite-element endosseous implant designs. Journal of Oral Implantology, 1994; 20: 315-21. three PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1983; 50: 399-410.
8. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1996; 7: 143-52.

9. Morgan MJ, James DF, Pilliar RM. Fractures of the fixture component of an osseointegrated implant. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 1993; 8: 409-14.
10. Yokoyama S ve ark. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2004; 91: 234-40.
11. Sertgöz A, Güvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1996; 76: 165-69.
12. Akca, K, Iplikcioglu H. Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior Rehabilitation 2002; 29: 350-56. Journal of Oral
13. Bahat O. Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 1993; 8: 151-61. implants.
14. van Steenberghe D ve ark. Applicability of osseointegrated rehabilitation prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 1990; 5: 272-81. in the a of partial edentulism:
15. Scurria MS ve ark. Prognostic variables associated with implant failure: a retrospective effectiveness study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 1998; 13: 400- 6.
16. Pilliar RM ve ark. Dental implant design: Effect on bone remodeling. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1991; 25: 467-83.
17. Brunski JB. Biomechanical considerations in dental implant design. International Journal of Oral Implantology, 1988; 5: 31-4.
18. Holmgren EP ve ark. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis-a twodimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. Journal of Oral Implantology, 1998; 24: 80-8.
19. Meijer HJ ve ark. Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,1992; 68: 96- 102.
20. Iplikcioglu H, Akca K. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. Journal of Dentistry, 2002; 30: 41-6.
21. Himmlova L ve ark. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2004; 91: 20-25.
22. Quek CE, Tan KB, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue performance of a single-tooth implant abutment system: effect of diameter. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2006; 21: 929-36.
23. Allum SR, Tomlinson RA, Joshi R. The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2008; 19: 553-9.
24. Romeo E ve ark. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2004; 19: 247-59.
25. Zinsli B ve ark. Clinical evaluation of small diameter ITI implants: a prospective study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2004; 19: 92-9.
26. Flanagan D ve ark. Measurement of the fatigue life of mini dental implants: a pilot study. Journal of Oral Implantology, 2008; 34: 7-11.
27. Serra G ve ark. Sequential bone healing of immediately loaded mini-implants. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2008; 134: 44-52.
28. Christensen GJ. Critical implants: good or bad for long-term service? Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2008; 20: 343-8. appraisal. Mini