FİSSÜR ÖRTÜCÜLER VE KULLANIM ALANLARI

Abstract

Fissür örtücüler, diş çürüklerini önlemek amacıyla dişlerdeki çukurcuk ve fissürlere uygulanan reçine esaslı materyallerdir. Fissür örtücülerin başarısı, mine yüzeyine bağlanma düzeylerine, çukurcuk ve fissürleri ağız ortamından izolasyon kapasitelerine bağlıdır. Fissürlerin dar enleri ve düzensiz derinlikleri, asit üreten bakterilerin birikmeleri için ideal bir ortamdır. Tükürüğün temizleme fonksiyonu, azı dişlerindeki çukurcuk ve fissürler için yetersiz kalır. Ayrıca, diş fırçasının kıl çapları da çoğu fissür yüzeyini temizlemek için çok büyüktür. Fissür örtücüler, bakteri plağında üretilen asitler için fiziksel bariyer görevi yaparlar. Geleneksel fissür örtücülerin uygulanması, çürük oluşma riskini kabul edilebilir düzeyde azaltırken, diş bütünlüğünü de koruyan non-invasiv bir tekniktir. Son zamanlarda koruyucu ve 1. basamak tedavilerin kullanımı oldukça azalmış ve diş hekimleri tarafından önemsenmemeye başlanmıştır. Çalışmamızın amacı fissür örtücülerinin öneminin daha iyi anlaşılması ve uygulama alanlarının net bir şekilde anlatılıp diş hekimleri tarafından kullanımının yaygınlaştırılmasıdır.

Keywords

• Çukurcuk ve fissür örtücü

References

1. ADA Council on Dental Materials and Devices and the Council on Dental Therapeutics: Pit and fissure sealants. J Am Dent Assoc. 1976: 93, 134.
2. Wyne AH. Caries prevalence, severity, and pattern in preschool children. . J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008: 9, 24-31.
3. Akyüz S, Kadir T, Erdem H. Dental caries and Cariostat test in preschool children. J Marmara Univ Dent Fac. 1997: 2, 616-20.
4. Eronat N, Koparal E.: Dental caries prevalence, dietary habits, tooth-brushing, and mother's education in 500 urban Turkish children. J Marmara Univ Dent Fac. 1997: 2, 599-604.
5. Pit and fissure sealants. Council on Dental Health and Health Planning. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987: 114, 671-2.
6. Feldens EG, Feldens CA, de Araujo FB. Invasive technique of pit and fissure sealants in primary molars: SEM study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1994: 18, 187-190.
7. Simonsen R. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealant after 15 years. J Am Dent Assoc, 1991: 122, 34-43.
8. Handelman SL, Leverett DH, Espeland M. Curzon J.Retention of sealants over carious and sound tooth surfaces. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1987: 15, 1-5.

9. Going RE, Loesche WJ, Grainger DA, Syed SA. The viability of microorganisms in carious lesions five years after covering with a fissure sealant. J Am Dent Assoc. 1978: 97, 455-62.
10. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Schuster GS, Fairjurst CW. Arresting caries by sealants: Results of a clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986: 112, 194-197.
11. Going RE, Haugh LD, Grainger DA, Conti AJ. Four-year clinical evaluation of a pit and fissure sealant. J Am Dent Assoc. 1977: 95, 972-81.
12. Handelman SL, Washburn F, Wopperer P. Two-year report of sealant effect on bacteria in dental caries. J Am Dent Assoc, 1976: 93, 96770.
13. Mejare I, Mjor IA. Glass ionomer and resinbased fissure sealant after 15 years. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990: 345-350.
14. Torppa-Saarinen E, Seppa L: Short-term retention of glass-ionomer fissure sealants. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1990: 86, 83-88.
15. Hilton TJ, Brom JC. Direct posterior esthetic restorations. In: Summit J, Robbins W, Hilton, Schwartz R, editors. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry. Texas: San Antonio, 2006, p. 303-2.
16. Olea N, Pulgar R, Perez P, et al. Estrogenicity of resin-based composites and sealants used in dentistry. Environ Health Persp 1996: 104, 298305.
17. Fung EY, et al. Pharmacokinetics of bisphenol A released from a dental sealant. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000: 131, 51-58.
18. Smales RJ, Lee YK, Lo FW, Tse CC, Chung MS. Handling and clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant. Am J Dent. 1996: 5, 203-5.
19. Park K, Georgescu M, Scherer W, Schulman A. Comparison of shear strength, fracture patterns and microleakage among unfilled, filled and fluoride-releasing sealant. Pediatr Dent. 1993: 15, 418-20.
20. Booksman L, McConnel RJ, Carson B. A 2year clinical evaluation of two pit and fissure sealants placed with and without the use of bonding agent. Quintessence Int. 1993: 24, 1313.
21. Tilles TS, Stach DJ, Hatch RA. Occlusal discrepancies after sealnt therapy. J Pros Dent. 1992: 68, 223-228.
22. Simonsen RJ. Links Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002: 24, 393-414.
23. Menon Preetha V, Shashikiran ND, Reddy VV. Comparison of antibacterial properties of two fluoride-releasing and a nonfluoride-releasing pit and fissure sealants. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007: 25, 133-6.
24. Lobo MM, Pecharki GD, Tengan C, da Silva DD, da Tagliaferro EP, Napimoga MH. Fluoride-releasing capacity and cariostatic effect provided by sealants.J Oral Sci. 2005: 47, 35-41.
25. Jensen OE, Billings RJ, Carson B. Clinical evaluation of fluorshield pit and fissure sealant. Clin Prevent Dent 1990: 12, 24-27.
26. Shapira J, et al. A comparative clinical study of auto polymerized fissure sealants: Five-year study. Pediatr Dent. 1990: 12, 24-27.
27. Pardi V, Sinhoreti MA, Pereira AC, Ambrosano GM, Meneghim Mde C. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of different materials used as pitand-fissure sealants.Braz Dent J. 2006: 17, 4952.
28. Smales RJ, Lee YK, Lo FW, Tse CC, Chung MS.Handling and clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant. Am J Dent. 1996: 5, 203-5.
29. Yildiz E, Dörter C, Efes B, Koray F. A comparative study of two fissure sealants: a 2year clinical follow-up. J Oral Rehabil. 2004: 31, 979-84.
30. Rego MA, Araujo MA. Microleakage evaluation of pit and fissure sealants done with different procedures, materials, and laser after invasive technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1999: 24, 63-8.
31. Francescut P, Lussi A. Performance of a conventinal sealant and a flowable composite on minimally prepared fissures. Operative dentistry, 2006: 31, 543-550.