DETERMINATION OF INCIDENCE OF COMPLICATIONS AND LIFE QUALITY AFTER MANDIBULAR IMPACTED THIRD MOLAR SURGERY* Mandibuler Gömülü Üçüncü Molar Dişlerin Çekimi Sonrası Gelişen Komplikasyonların Insidansının ve Hastaların Yaşam Kalitesinin Belirlenmesi

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Purpose: The aim of this study is determination of the frequency of occurrence, severity and type of complications developing after mandibular impacted third molar teeth surgery, examination of their reasons, prevention of observed complications, and to increase the patients post-operative quality of life.
Material and Methods: The study involved 121 mandibular impacted third molar teeth of a total of 105 patients (77 female, 28 male). The age, gender, medical history, bad habits, classification of impacted third molar teeth, postoperatif complications such as pain, edema, trismus and paresthesia, oral hygiene in addition to oral contraceptive use and menstruation periods of patients were recorded.
Results: Statistically significant results were seen between existence of edema (94, 5.5±3.06, p=0.004) and bleeding complication (29, 6.24±2.77, p=0.019), between the operation period and existence of edema (94, 30.65±15.49, p=0.005) also between the operation period and paresthesia complication (10, 41.2±5.15, p=0.006).
Conclusion: The post-operative findings affecting quality of life are pain, edema, trismus, and paresthesia. A careful surgical technique and operative diligence coupled with implementation by the patients of post-operative directives reduce the frequency and intensity of complications.
Keywords: Mandibular impacted third molar, complication, visual analogue scale, life quality

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; mandibuler gömülü üçüncü molar diş cerrahisi sonrası gelişen komp-likasyonların görülme sıklığı, şiddeti ve çeşidinin saptanması, nedenlerin araştırılması, görülen komp-likasyonların önlenmesi ve hastaların cerrahi operasyon sonrası yaşam kalitesinin belirlenmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma, yaşları 16 ile 83 arasında değişen, 77'si bayan, 28'i erkek toplam 105 hastanın 121 mandibuler gömülü üçüncü molar dişi üzerinde yürütüldü. Tüm hastaların yaşı, cinsiyeti, sistemik durumu, kötü alışkanlıkları, ağız hijyenleri, oral kontraseptif kullanımı ve menstürasyon dönemleri ayrıca mandibuler gömülü üçüncü molar sınıflaması, ağrı, ödem, trismus, parestezi gibi postoperatif komplikasyonlar kaydedildi.
Bulgular: Ödem varlığı (94, 5.5±3.06, p=0.004) ve kanama komplikasyonu arasında (29, 6.24±2.77, p=0.019), operasyon süresi ile ödem varlığı arasında (94, 30.65±15.49, p=0.005) ve operasyon süresi ile parestezi komplikasyonu arasında (10, 41.2±15.15, p=0.006) istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark kaydedildi.
Sonuç: Yaşam kalitesinin kötüleşmesine neden olan postoperatif bulgular, ağrı, ödem, trismus ve parestezi olup, dikkatli bir cerrahi teknik, operatif özen ve hastaların postoperatif önerileri uygulaması komplikasyonların sıklığını ve şiddetini azaltacaktır.
Anahtar kelimeler: Mandibuler gömülü üçüncü molar, komplikasyon, görsel analog skala, yaşam kalitesi

Keywords

• Mandibular impacted third molar, complication, visual analogue scale, life quality

Mandibuler Gömülü Üçüncü Molar Dişlerin Çekimi Sonrası Gelişen Komplikasyonların İnsidansının ve Hastaların Yaşam Kalitesinin Belirlenmesi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; mandibuler gömülü üçüncü molar diş cerrahisi sonrası gelişen komplikasyonların görülme sıklığı, şiddeti ve çeşidinin saptanması, nedenlerin araştırılması, görülen komplikasyonların önlenmesi ve hastaların cerrahi operasyon sonrası yaşam kalitesinin belirlenmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma, yaşları 16 ile 83 arasında değişen, 77’si bayan, 28’i erkek toplam 105 hastanın 121 mandibuler gömülü üçüncü molar dişi üzerinde yürütüldü. Tüm hastaların yaşı, cinsiyeti, sistemik durumu, kötü alışkanlıkları, ağız hijyenleri, oral kontraseptif kullanımı ve menstürasyon dönemleri ayrıca mandibuler gömülü üçüncü molar sınıflaması, ağrı, ödem, trismus, parestezi gibi postoperatif komplikasyonlar kaydedildi.Bulgular: Ödem varlığı (94, 5.5±3.06, p=0.004) ve kanama komplikasyonu arasında (29, 6.24±2.77, p=0.019), operasyon süresi ile ödem varlığı arasında (94, 30.65±15.49, p=0.005) ve operasyon süresi ile parestezi komplikasyonu arasında (10, 41.2±15.15, p=0.006) istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark kaydedildi.Sonuç: Yaşam kalitesinin kötüleşmesine neden olan postoperatif bulgular, ağrı, ödem, trismus ve parestezi olup, dikkatli bir cerrahi teknik, operatif özen ve hastaların postoperatif önerileri uygulaması komplikasyonların sıklığını ve şiddetini azaltacaktır.

Keywords

• Mandibuler gömülü üçüncü molar, komplikasyon, görsel analog skala, yaşam kalitesi

References

1. Avcı N, Dural S, Karabıyıkoğlu T. Gömük dişlerin görülme sıklığı çenelere göre dağılımları ve gömük kalma nedenleri. SBAD (Sağlık Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi) 1996;7:127-33.
2. Effectiveness matters. Prophilactic removal of impacted third molars: is it justified? Br J Orthod 1999;26(2):149-51.
3. Phillips C, White RP Jr, Shugars DA, Zhou X. Risk factors associated with prolonged recovery and delayed healing after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61(12):1436-48.
4. Şençift MK. Gömülü mandibuler 3. molar cerrahisinde kullanılan diflunisal ve parasetamol’ün klinik ve farmakokinetik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılmalı incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, 1994.
5. Bruce RA, Frederickson GC, Small GS. Age of patients and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;101(2):240-5.
6. Fisher SE, Frame JW, Rout PG, McEntegart DJ. Factors affecting the onset and severity of pain following the surgical removal of unilateral impacted mandibular third molar teeth. Br Dent J 1988;164(11):351-4.
7. Chiapasco M, De Cicco L, Marrone G. Side effects and complications associated with third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;76(4):412
8. Charparro-Avendano AV, Perez-Garcia S, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Morbidity of third molar extraction in patients between 12 and 18 years of age. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2005;10(5):422- 31.

9. Yuasa H, Suquira M. Clinical postoperative findings after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: prediction of postoperative facial swelling and pain based on preoperative variables. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;42(3):209-14.
10. Monaco G, Staffolani C, Gatto MR, Checchi L. Antibiotic therapy in impacted third molar surgery. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107(6):437-41.
11. Capuzzi P, Montebugnoli L, Vaccaro MA. Extraction of impacted third molars. A longitudinal prospective study on factors that affect postoperative recovery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;77(4):341-3.
12. Kim JC, Choi SS, Wang SJ, Kim SG. Minor complications after mandibular third molar surgery: type, incidence, and possible prevention. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102(2):e4-e11. de Boer MP, Raghoebar GM, Stegenga B, Schoen PJ, Boering G. Complications after mandibular third molar extraction. Quintessence Int 1995;26(11):779-84.
13. Pedersen A. Interrelation of complaints after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Surg 1985;14(3):241-4.
14. Lee JY, Do HS, Lim JH, Jang HS, Rim JS, Kwon JJ, Lee ES. Correlation of antibiotic prophylaxis and difficulty of extraction with postoperative inflammatory complications in the lower third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;52(1):54-7.
15. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974;2(7889):1127-31.
16. Sanchis JM, Penarrocha M. Dolor orofacial postquirurgico. In: Penarrocha M (Ed). Dolor orofacial. Etiologia, diagnostico y tratamiento. Barcelona: Mason, 1997, p.267-70.
17. Penarrocha M, Sanchis JM, Saez U, Gay C, Bagan JV. Oral hygiene and postoperative pain after mandibular third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92(3):260-4.
18. Carmichael FA, McGowan DA. Incidence of nerve damage following third molar removal: a West of Scotland Oral Surgery Research Group study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;30(2):78-82.
19. Pogrel MA, Renaut A, Schmidt B, Ammar A. The relationship of the lingual nerve to the mandibular third molar region: an anatomic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53(10):1178-81.
20. Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Guerrouani A, Zeinoun T, Vervaet C, Legrand W. A four-year monocentric study of the complications of third molars extractions under general anesthesia: about 2112 patients. Int J Dent 2013;2013:763837. doi: 1155/2013/763837. Epub 2013 Sep
21. Kipp DP, Goldstein BH, Weiss WW Jr. Dysesthesia after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1,377 surgical procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;100(2):185-92.
22. Macgregor AJ. The impacted lower wisdom tooth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.
23. Jerjes W, El-Maaytah M, Swinson B, Banu B, Upile T, D’Sa S, Al- Khawalde M, Chaib B, Hopper C. Experience versus complication rate in third molar surgery. Head Face Med 2006;2:14-20. Mason DA. Lingual nerve damage following third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;17(5):290-4.
24. To EW, Chan FF. Lingual nerve retractor. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;32(2):125-6.
25. Chiapasco M, Crescentini M, Romanoni G. Germectomy or delayed removal of mandibular impacted third molars: the relationship between age and incidence of complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53(4):418-22; discussion 422-3.
26. Queral-Godoy E, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Incidence and evolution of inferior alveolar nerve lesions following lower third molar extraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99(3):259-64.
27. Tomei F, Aubert JP, Benaim JL, Legre R, Magalon G. Results of nevre sutures in the wrist in children. Chir Main 2000;19(1):23-30.
28. Ahcan U, Kolbl J, Janko M. Sympathetic skin response and regeneration of sudomotor fibers after complete division of peripheral nerves. J Auton Nerv Syst 1996;58(1-2):69-75.
29. Awang MN. The aetiology of dry socket: a review. Int Dent J 1989;39(4):236-40.
30. Lilly GE, Osborn DB, Rael EM, Samuels HS, Jones JC. Alveolar osteitis associated with mandibular third molar extractions. J Am Dent Assoc 1974;88(4):802-6.
31. Catellani JE, Harvey S, Erickson SH, Cherkin D. Effect of oral contraceptive cycle on dry socket (localized alveolar osteitis). J Am Dent Assoc 1980;101(5):777-80.
32. Sweet JB, Butler DP. The relationship of smoking to localized osteitis. J Oral Surg 1979;37(10):732-5.
33. Sisk AL, Hammer WB, Shelton DW, Joy ED Jr. Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44(11):855-9.
34. Muhonen A, Venta I, Ylipaavalniemi P. Factors predisposing to postoperative complications related to wisdom tooth surgery among university students. J Am Coll Health 1997;46(1):39-42.
35. Eshghpour M, Nejat AH. Dry socket following surgical removal of impacted third molar in an Iranian population: incidence and risk factors. Niger J Clin Pract 2013;16(4):496-500.
36. Eshghpour M, Rezaei NM, Nejat A. Effect of menstrual cycle on frequency of alveolar osteitis in women undergoing surgical removal of mandibular third molar: a single-blind randomized clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Piecuch JF, Arzadon J, Lieblich SE. Prophylactic antibiotics for third molar surgery: a supportive opinion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53(1):53-60.
37. MacGregor AJ. Anti-prophylactic antibiotics. J Oral Surg 1976;34(12):1063.
38. Mitchell DA. A controlled clinical trial of prophylactic tinidazole for chemoprophylaxis in third molar surgery. Br Dent J 1986;160(8):284-6.
39. Osborn TP, Frederickson G Jr, Small IA, Torgerson TS. A prospective study of complications related to mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;43(10):767-9.
40. Goldberg MH, Nemarich AN, Marco WP 2nd. Complications after mandibular third molar surgery: a statistical analysis of 500 consecutive procedures in private practice. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;111(2):277-9.
41. Krimmel M, Reinert S. Mandibular fracture after third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58(10):1110-2.
42. Werkmeister R, Fillies T, Joos U, Smolka K. Relationship between lower wisdom tooth position and cyst development, deep abscess formation and mandibular angle fracture. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2005;33(3):164-8.
43. Alling CC, Alling RD. Indications for management of impacted teeth. In: Alling CC, Helfrick JF, Alling RD (Ed). Impacted teeth. Philadelphia: W.S. Saunders, 1993, p.46-64.
44. Duarte BG, Assis D, Ribeiro-Jşnior P, Gonçales ES. Does the relationship between retained mandibular third molar and mandibular angle fracture exist? An assessment of three possible causes. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2012;5(3):127-36.
45. Lamping DL, Brown J, Smith SC. Patient-based measures to evaluate surgical outcomes: myths and realities. Ann R Coll Surg Eng (Supp) 2001;83:78-81.
46. Thomson PJ, Fletcher IR, Briggs S, Barthram D, Cato G. Patient morbidity following oral day surgery: use of a post-operative telephone questionnaire. J Ambulatory Surg 2003;10:122-7.
47. Smith BL, Young PN. Day stay anaesthesia. A follow-up of day patients undergoing dental operations under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1976;31(2):181-9.
48. Bridgman CM, Ashby D, Holloway PJ. An investigation of the effects on children of tooth extraction under general anaesthesia in general dental practice. Br Dent J 1999;186(5):245-7.
49. Corresponding Author: Berkem ATALAY Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 34093, Çapa-Fatih / İstanbul Phone: [phone] e-mail: [e-mail]