IN VITRO COMPARISON OF GUTTA-PERCHA-FILLED AREA PERCENTAGES IN ROOT CANALS INSTRUMENTED AND OBTURATED WITH DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES

Year 2017, Volume: 51 Issue: 2, 37 - 42, 02.04.2017

Ayça Yılmaz İşıl Karagöz Küçükay

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of different obturation techniques in root canals instrumented either by hand or rotary instruments with regard to the percentage of gutta- percha-filled area (PGFA).

Materials and Methods: One hundred and sixty extracted mandibular premolars with single, straight root canals were studied. Root canals were prepared to an apical size of 30 by hand with a modified crown-down technique or the ProTaper and HEROShaper systems. Teeth were divided into eight groups (n=20) according to the following instrumentation and obturation techniques: G1: Hand files+lateral condensation (LC), G2: Hand files+Thermafil, G3: ProTaper+LC, G4: ProTaper+single-cone, G5: ProTaper+ProTaper-Obturator, G6: HEROShaper+LC, G7: HEROShaper+single-cone, G8: HEROShaper+HEROfill. Horizontal sections were cut at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13 mm from the apical foramen. A total of 1120 sections obtained were digitally photographed under a stereomicroscope set at 48X magnification. The cross-sectional area of the canal and the gutta-percha was measured by digital image analysis and the PGFA was calculated for each section.

Results: The mean of the PGFA in Thermafil (G2), ProTaper-Obturator (G5) and HEROfill (G8) groups was significantly higher than the other groups. In G3 and G4, PGFA showed no significant difference in the apical segments whereas PGFA was significantly higher at the middle and coronal segments in G3. In G6 and G7, PGFA showed no significant difference in the apical and middle segments whereas PGFA was significantly higher at the coronal segments in G6.

Conclusion: The carrier-based gutta-percha obturation systems revealed significantly higher PGFA in comparison to single-cone and lateral condensation techniques.

Keywords

NiTi rotary systems, carrier-based obturation systems; single-cone obturation; gutta-percha-filled area; root canal obturation

References

• Hülsmann M, Peters O, Dummer PM. Mechanical preparation of root canals: Shaping goals, techniques and means. Endodontic Topics 2005;10(1):30-76.
• Schӓfer E, Burklein S. Impact of nickel-titanium instrumentation of the root canal on clinical outcomes: A focused review. Odontology 2012;100(2):130-136.
• Hargreaves KM, Berman LH. Pathways of the pulp. 11th ed., Missouri, USA: Elsevier, 2016. p. 312.
• Gencoglu N. Comparison of 6 different gutta-percha techniques (part ii): Thermafil, js quick-fill, soft core, microseal, system b, and lateral condensation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96(1):91-95.
• Hale R, Gatti R, Glickman GN, Opperman LA. Comparative analysis of carrier-based obturation and lateral compaction: A retrospective clinical outcomes study. Int J Dent 2012;954675.
• Dahlkemper PE. American Association of Endodontists: Guide to clinical Endodontics. 6th Ed., Chicago, USA; 2016. p. 15.
• Orstavik D. Weight loss of endodontic sealers, cements and pastes in water. Scand J Dent Res 1983;91(4):316-319.
• Peters DD. Two-year in vitro solubility evaluation of four gutta-percha sealer obturation techniques. J Endod 1986;12(4):139-145.
• De-Deus G, Gurgel-Filho ED, Magalhaes KM, Coutinho-Filho T. A laboratory analysis of gutta-percha-filled area obtained using thermafil, system b and lateral condensation. Int Endod J 2006;39(5):378-383.
• Eguchi DS, Peters DD, Hollinger JO, Lorton L. A comparison of the area of the canal space occupied by gutta-percha following four gutta-percha obturation techniques using procosol sealer. J Endod 1985;11(4):166-175.
• Wu MK, Wesselink PR. A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. Int Endod J 2001;34(2):137-141.
• Gordon MP, Love RM, Chandler NP. An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals. Int Endod J 2005;38(2):87-96.
• Schӓfer E, Nelius B, Burklein S. A comparative evaluation of gutta-percha filled areas in curved root canals obturated with different techniques. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16(1):225- 230.
• Somma F, Cretella G, Carotenuto M, Pecci R, Bedini R, De Biasi M, Angerame D. Quality of thermoplasticized and single point root fillings assessed by micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J 2011;44(4):362-369.
• Wu MK, Bud MG, Wesselink PR. The quality of single cone and laterally compacted gutta-percha fillings in small and curved root canals as evidenced by bidirectional radiographs and fluid transport measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108(6):946-951.
• Stock CJR, Gulabivala K, Walker RT, Goodman JR. Endodontics. 2nd Ed., London, UK: Mosby-Wolfe; 1997. p. 82.
• Wu MK, Ozok AR, Wesselink PR. Sealer distribution in root canals obturated by three techniques. Int Endod J 2000;33(4):340-345.
• Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H. Comparison of single cone obturation performance of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems. Acta Odontol Scand 2014;72(7):537-542.
• Cathro PR, Love RM. Comparison of microseal and system b/obtura II obturation techniques. Int Endod J 2003;36(12):876-882.
• De-Deus G, Maniglia-Ferreira CM, Gurgel-Filho ED, Paciornik S, Machado AC, Coutinho-Filho T. Comparison of the percentage of gutta-percha-filled area obtained by thermafil and system B. Aust Endod J 2007;33(2):55-61.
• De-Deus G, Reis C, Beznos D, de Abranches AM, Coutinho-Filho T, Paciornik S. Limited ability of three commonly used thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques in filling oval- shaped canals. J Endod 2008;34(11):1401-1405.
• Gulsahi K, Cehreli ZC, Kuraner T, Dagli FT. Sealer area associated with cold lateral condensation of gutta-percha and warm coated carrier filling systems in canals prepared with various rotary niti systems. Int Endod J 2007;40(4):275-281.
• Samadi F, Jaiswal J, Saha S, Garg N, Chowdhary S, Samadi F, Tripathi VP. A comparative evaluation of efficacy of different obturation techniques used in root canal treatment of anterior teeth: An in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(1):1-5.
• Schafer E, Koster M, Burklein S. Percentage of gutta-percha-filled areas in canals instrumented with nickel-titanium systems and obturated with matching single cones. J Endod 2013;39(7):924-928.
• Schafer E, Schrenker C, Zupanc J, Burklein S. Percentage of gutta-percha filled areas in canals obturated with cross-linked gutta-percha core-carrier systems, single-cone and lateral compaction technique. J Endod 2016;42(2):294-298.
• Schafer E, Zandbiglari T. Solubility of root-canal sealers in water and artificial saliva. Int Endod J 2003;36(10):660-669.
• Jarrett IS, Marx D, Covey D, Karmazin M, Lavin M, Gound T. Percentage of canals filled in apical cross sections - an in vitro study of seven obturation techniques. Int Endod J 2004;37(6):392-398.
• van der Sluis LW, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper. Int Endod J 2005;38(10):764-768.