ADVANCED DENTAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT TECHNIQUES

Year 2017, Volume: 51 Issue: 3 Suppl 1, 76 - 89, 02.12.2017

Alex Greenberg

Abstract

The availability of in office Cone Beam CT (CBCT) scanners, dental implant planning software, CAD CAM milling, and rapid printing technologies allow for the precise placement of dental implants and immediate prosthetic temporization. These technologies allow for flapless implant placement, or open flap bone reduction for “All on 4” techniques with improved preoperative planning and intraoperative performance. CBCT permits practitioners in an office setting with powerful diagnostic capabilities for the evaluation of bone quality and quantity, as well as dental and osseous pathology essential for better informed dental implant treatment. CBCT provides the convenience of in office imaging and decreased radiation exposure. Rapid printing technologies provide decreased time and highly accuracy for surgical drill guide fabrication and bone model fabrication.

Keywords

Cone Beam CT, surgical guide; drill; planning; dental implant

References

• Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Naert I, Quirynen M, Hermans R, Van Steenberghe D. Predictability of reformatted computed tomography for pre-operative planning of endosseous implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28(1):37-41.
• Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E, Henne M, Tardieu AL. Computer-assisted implant placement: Scan template, simplant, surgiguide, and safe system. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;27(2):141-149.
• Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Madianos P. Presentation of two cases of immediate restoration of implants in the esthetic region, using facilitate software and guides with stereolithographic model surgery prior to patient surgery. J Prosthodont 2012;21(2):130-137.
• van Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blomback U, Andersson M, Schutyser F, Pettersson A, Wendelhag I. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: A prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 Suppl 1:S111-120.
• Amorfini L, Storelli S, Romeo E. Rehabilitation of a dentate mandible requiring a full arch rehabilitation. Immediate loading of a fixed complete denture on 8 implants placed with a bone-supported surgical computer-planned guide: A case report. J Oral Implantol 2011;37 Spec No:106-113.
• Rubin GD. Computed tomography: Revolutionizing the practice of medicine for 40 years. Radiology 2014;273(2 Suppl):S45-74.
• Chau AC, Fung K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107(4):559-565.
• Rugani P, Kirnbauer B, Arnetzl GV, Jakse N. Cone beam computerized tomography: Basics for digital planning in oral surgery and implantology. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12(2):131-145.
• Oliva L. [Alessandro vallebona (1899-1987)]. Radiol Med 1988;76(1-2):127-129.
• Scarfe WC, Eraso FE, Farman AG. Characteristics of the orthopantomograph op 100. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27(1):51-57.
• Beckmann EC. "Godfrey newbold hounsfield". Physics Today 2005;58(3):84-85.
• Shampo MA, Kyle RA. Allan Cormack--codeveloper of computed tomographic scanner. Mayo Clin Proc 1996;71(3):288.
• Raju TN. The Nobel chronicles. 1979: Allan Macleod Cormack (b 1924); and Sir Godfrey Newbold Hounsfield (b 1919). Lancet 1999;354(9190):1653.
• Goodman LR. The beatles, the nobel prize, and ct scanning of the chest. Radiol Clin North Am 2010;48(1):1-7.
• Sittig DF, Ash JS, Ledley RS. The story behind the development of the first whole-body computerized tomography scanner as told by Robert S. Ledley. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13(5):465-469.
• Kalender WA, Vock P, Polacin A, Soucek M. [spiral-ct: A new technique for volumetric scans. I. Basic principles and methodology]. Rontgenpraxis 1990;43(9):323-330.
• Soucek M, Vock P, Daepp M, Kalender WA. [spiral-ct: A new technique for volumetric scans. II. Potential clinical applications]. Rontgenpraxis 1990;43(10):365-375.
• Hornich H. A tribute to johann radon. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1986;5(4):169.
• Anastasio MA, Pan X, Clarkson E. Comments on the filtered backprojection algorithm, range conditions, and the pseudoinverse solution. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20(6):539-542.
• Wininger KL. Basis of CT: The radon transform. Radiol Technol 2013;84(4):413-418.
• Zhang-O'Connor Y, Fessler JA. Fourier-based forward and back-projectors in iterative fan-beam tomographic image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25(5):582-589.
• Pan X, Sidky EY, Vannier M. Why do commercial ct scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction? Inverse Probl 2009;25(12):1230009.
• Greenberg A. Basics of Cone-Beam CT and CT guided dental implant surgery. Selected Readings in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;19(5):1-48.
• Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357(22):2277-2284.
• Lee CY, Koval TM, Suzuki JB. Low-dose radiation risks of computerized tomography and cone beam computerized tomography: Reducing the fear and controversy. J Oral Implantol 2015;41(5):e223-230.
• Pauwels R, Cockmartin L, Ivanauskaite D, Urboniene A, Gavala S, Donta C, Tsiklakis K, Jacobs R, Bosmans H, Bogaerts R, Horner K, Consortium SP. Estimating cancer risk from dental cone-beam ct exposures based on skin dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 2014;59(14):3877-3891.
• Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F, Land C. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(22):2071-2077.
• Shuryak I, Sachs RK, Brenner DJ. A new view of radiation-induced cancer. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2011;143(2-4):358-364.
• Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: The impact of 2007 international commission on radiological protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139(9):1237-1243.
• National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; NCRP Report No. 160; 2006.
• Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol 2009;82(973):35-40.
• Mettler FA, Jr., Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: A catalog. Radiology 2008;248(1):254-263.
• Kamburoglu K. Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. World J Radiol 2015;7(6):128-130.
• Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology 2004;232(3):735-738.
• Brooks RA. A quantitative theory of the hounsfield unit and its application to dual energy scanning. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1977;1(4):487-493.
• Greenberg AM. Cone beam computed tomography scanning and diagnosis for dental implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2015;27(2):185-202.
• Mardinger O, Namani-Sadan N, Chaushu G, Schwartz-Arad D. Morphologic changes of the nasopalatine canal related to dental implantation: A radiologic study in different degrees of absorbed maxillae. J Periodontol 2008;79(9):1659-1662.
• Sheikhi M, Karbasi Kheir M, Hekmatian E. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of mental foramen variations: A preliminary study. Radiol Res Pract 2015;2015:124635.
• Pertl L, Gashi-Cenkoglu B, Reichmann J, Jakse N, Pertl C. Preoperative assessment of the mandibular canal in implant surgery: Comparison of rotational panoramic radiography (OPG), computed tomography (CT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for preoperative assessment in implant surgery. Eur J Oral Implantol 2013;6(1):73-80.
• Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Mischkowski RA, Dreiseidler T, Scherer P, Ketterle M, Rothamel D, Zoller JE. Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy by cone-beam ct prior to sinus floor elevation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(2):258-265.
• Weber AL. Imaging of cysts and odontogenic tumors of the jaw. Definition and classification. Radiol Clin North Am 1993;31(1):101-120.
• Katheria BC, Kau CH, Tate R, Chen JW, English J, Bouquot J. Effectiveness of impacted and supernumerary tooth diagnosis from traditional radiography versus cone beam computed tomography. Pediatr Dent 2010;32(4):304-309.
• Kruse C, Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A, Kirkevang LL. Cone beam computed tomography and periapical lesions: A systematic review analysing studies on diagnostic efficacy by a hierarchical model. Int Endod J 2015;48(9):815-828.
• Tyndall DA, Rathore S. Cone-beam ct diagnostic applications: Caries, periodontal bone assessment, and endodontic applications. Dent Clin North Am 2008;52(4):825-841, vii.
• Zhang ZL, Qu XM, Li G, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. The detection accuracies for proximal caries by cone-beam computerized tomography, film, and phosphor plates. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111(1):103-108.
• Hariya Y, Yuasa K, Nakayama E, Kawazu T, Okamura K, Kanda S. Value of computed tomography findings in differentiating between intraosseous malignant tumors and osteomyelitis of the mandible affecting the masticator space. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95(4):503-509.
• Araki M, Kameoka S, Matsumoto N, Komiyama K. Usefulness of cone beam computed tomography for odontogenic myxoma. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36(7):423-427.
• Cassatly MG, Greenberg AM, Kopp WK. Bilateral giant cell granulomata of the mandible: Report of case. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117(6):731-733.
• Cavalcanti MG, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW. Evaluation of an ossifying fibroma using three-dimensional computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30(6):342-345.
• Braut V, Bornstein MM, Lauber R, Buser D. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: A retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012;32(2):175-184.
• Greenberg AM. Digital technologies for dental implant treatment planning and guided surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2015;27(2):319-340.
• Jacobs R, Mraiwa N, vanSteenberghe D, Gijbels F, Quirynen M. Appearance, location, course, and morphology of the mandibular incisive canal: An assessment on spiral ct scan. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31(5):322-327.
• Kuribayashi A, Watanabe H, Imaizumi A, Tantanapornkul W, Katakami K, Kurabayashi T. Bifid mandibular canals: Cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39(4):235-239.
• Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Gotoh K, Ariji E. Accessory mental foramen assessment using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107(2):289-294.
• Uchida Y, Noguchi N, Goto M, Yamashita Y, Hanihara T, Takamori H, Sato I, Kawai T, Yosue T. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: A second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67(4):744-750.
• De Santis D, Canton LC, Cucchi A, Zanotti G, Pistoia E, Nocini PF. Computer-assisted surgery in the lower jaw: Double surgical guide for immediately loaded implants in postextractive sites-technical notes and a case report. J Oral Implantol 2010;36(1):61-68.
• Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: Diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26(3):215-221.
• Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Gravito I. All-on-4(r) treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: A 7-year clinical and 5-year radiographic retrospective case series with risk assessment for implant failure and marginal bone level. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17 Suppl 2:e531-541.
• Jensen OT, Adams MW, Cottam JR, Parel SM, Phillips WR, 3rd. The all-on-4 shelf: Maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68(10):2520-2527.
• Jensen OT, Adams MW, Cottam JR, Parel SM, Phillips WR, 3rd. The all on 4 shelf: Mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69(1):175-181.
• US 9,050,665
• US 8,750,590
• Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: A clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(2):234-242.
• Flugge TV, Nelson K, Schmelzeisen R, Metzger MC. Three-dimensional plotting and printing of an implant drilling guide: Simplifying guided implant surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71(8):1340-1346.
• Cremonini CC, Dumas M, Pannuti CM, Neto JB, Cavalcanti MG, Lima LA. Assessment of linear measurements of bone for implant sites in the presence of metallic artefacts using cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40(8):845-850.
• Van de Wiele G, Teughels W, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Temmerman A, Quirynen M. The accuracy of guided surgery via mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical templates in the hands of surgeons with little experience. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26(12):1489-1494.
• Greenberg AM. Basic dental implantology in greenberg am and schmelzeisen eds craniomaxillofacial reconstructive and corrective bone surgery New York: Springer Verlag, 2016 in press.