Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF TRIPLET DEFICIT HYPOTHESIS IN THE BRIC AND THE MINT COUNTRIES

Year 2016, , 57 - 70, 29.01.2016
https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.119

Abstract

The fact that current account deficit is one of the leading indicators is the reason that the
determinants of current account deficit are investigated. In the literature, the presence of current
account deficit along with the budget deficit is denoted with the twin deficits notion, while it has
been mentioned from triplet deficits, which has a limited number of work, with the addition of the
savings-investment imbalance to the twin deficits. The study aims to analyze the presence of the triplet
deficits in the BRIC and the MINT as an emerging two groups of countries between 1998 and 2014 via
Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012)’s panel non-causality test. The empirical findings showed that the
triplet deficit hypothesis is valid for BRIC, but not for MINT.  

References

  • AKINCI, M. ve YILMAZ, Ö., 2013, Türkiye Ekonomisinde Üçüz Açık Hipotezinin Geçerliliği: Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı, İMKB Dergisi, 13 (50), 1-27.
  • ALKSVANI, M. A., 2000, The Twin Deficit Phenomenon in Petroleum Economy, Evidence From Saudi Arabia [Online], King Saud University Department of Economıcs, 1-25, http://www.erf.org.eg/CMS/uploads/pdf/1185358196_finance1.pdf [Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2015].
  • BAHARUMSHAH, A. Z. ve EVAN L., 2007, Dynamics of Fiscal and Current Account Deficits in Thailand: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Economic Studies, 34 (6), 454-475.
  • BOLAT, S., DEĞİRMEN S. ve ŞENGÖNÜL A., 2015, The Dynamics of Triple Deficits in European Countries: New Insights from Panel Granger Causality Tests [Online], 22nd International Economic Conference, Romania. <http://www.soc.uoc.gr/macro/docs/Year/2015/papers/paper_4_118.pdf> [Erişim Tarihi: 20.11.2015].
  • CHOWDHURY, K. ve SALEH. A. S., 2007, Testing the Keynesian Proposition of Twin Deficits in the Presence of Trade Liberalisation: Evidence from Sri Lanka, Wollongong Economics Working Paper, No: 07-09, 1-33.
  • ÇELİK, S. ve DENİZ, P., 2009, An Empirical Investigation of Twin Deficits Hypothesis for Six Emerging Countries [Online], SSRN Working Paper Series, Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1389242 [Erişim Tarihi: 21.08.2015].
  • DARRAT, F. A., 1988, Have Large Budge Deficits Caused Rising Trade Deficits?, Southern Economic Journal, 54 (4), 879-887.
  • DUMITRESCU, E-I. ve HURLİN, C., 2012, Testing for Granger non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels, Economic Modelling, 29 (4), 1450–1460.
  • EISNER, R., 1994, National Saving and Budget Deficits, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76 (1), 181-186.
  • FISHER, S. ve EASTERLY, W., 1990, The Economics of The Government Budget Constraint, The World Bank Research Observer, 5 (2), 127-142.
  • GRANGER, C. W. J., 1969, Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Modelsand Cross Spectral Method, Econometrica, 37, 424–438.
  • GÜLOĞLU, B. ve İSPİR, S., 2009, Yeni Gelişmeler Işığında Türkiye’de Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi Önsavının Panel Birim Kök Sınaması, Pamukkale Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F.İktisat Bölümü Yayınları.
  • HADRI, K. ve KUROZUMI, E., 2012, A Simple Panel Stationarity Test in the Presence of Serial Correlation and a Common Factor, Economics Letters, 115, 31–34.
  • HSIAO, C., 2003, Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • KARAÇOR, Z., ALPTEKİN, V., AKAR, T. ve AKAR, G., 2012, İstikrar Mı, İstikrarsızlık Mı? Türkiye’de Üçüz Açık Analizi, Türkiye Ekonomisi Kurumu 3. Uluslararası Ekonomi Konferansı, “Borç Dinamikleri, Finansal İstikrarsızlık ve Büyük Durgunluk”, 1-3 Kasım 2012, İzmir.
  • KWIATKOWSKI, D., P.C.B. PHILLIPS, P., SCHMIDT, Y. S., 1992, Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root, Journal of Econometrics, North-Holland, 54, 159-178.
  • MCTEER, B., 2008, Our Triple Deficits [Online], National Center for Policy Analysis, No: 613, 1-2, http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba613 [Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2015].
  • ÖZDEMİR, D., BUZDAĞLI Ö,. EMSEN, Ö. S. ve ÇELİK A. A., 2014, Geçiş Ekonomilerinde Üçüz Açık Hipotezinin Geçerliliği, International Conference on Eurasian Economies, 1-7.
  • PESARAN, M. H., 2004, General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels [Online], University of Cambridge Working Paper, Paper No.0435, http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/research/ repec /cam/pdf/cwpe0435.pdf, [Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2014]
  • PESARAN, M. H., ve YAMAGATA, T., 2008, Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels, Journal of Econometrics, 142, 50–93.
  • ROUBINI, N., 1988, Current Account and Budget Deficits in an Intertemporal Model of Consumption and Taxation Smoothing: A Solution to the ‘Feldstein Horioka Puzzle?, NBER Working Paper, No. 2773.
  • SÜREKÇİ, D., 2011, Türkiye’de Üçüz Açıklar Olgusunun Analizi: Dinamik Bir Yaklaşım, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 18 (1), 51-59.
  • TANG, T. C., 2014, Fiscal Deficit, Trade Deficit and Financial Account Deficit: Triple Deficits Hypotesis with the U.S. Experience, Business and Economics, Discussion Paper 06/14, 1-13.
  • TÜLÜMCE, S. Y., 2013, Türkiye’de Üçüz Açığın Ampirik Analizi (1984-2010), Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 165, 97-114.
  • ZAIDI, I. M., 1985, Saving Investment, Fiscal Deficit and the External Indebtedness of Developing Countries, World Development, 13 (5), 573-588.

BRIC VE MINT EKONOMİLERİNDE ÜÇÜZ AÇIK HİPOTEZİNİN AMPİRİK ANALİZİ

Year 2016, , 57 - 70, 29.01.2016
https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.119

Abstract

Ülkelerde cari açığın krizin öncü göstergelerinden biri olması cari açığın belirleyenlerinin
araştırılmasına yönelik çalışmaların artmasına neden olmuştur. Literatürde cari açıkla birlikte bütçe
açığının varlığı ikiz açık olgusu ile ifade edilirken, ikiz açık olgusuna tasarruf-yatırım dengesizliğinin
ilave edilmesi ile sınırlı çalışma sayısına sahip olan üçüz açık olgusundan bahsedilmektedir. Bu
çalışma gelişen iki ülke grubu olarak BRIC (Brezilya, Rusya, Hindistan ve Çin) ve MINT (Meksika,
Endonezya, Nijerya ve Türkiye) ekonomilerinde 1998-2014 yılları arasında üçüz açık hipotezinin
geçerliliğini Dumitrescu ve Hurlin (2012)’nin panel nedensellik testi aracılığıyla analiz etmeyi
amaçlamaktadır. Bulgular, üçüz açık hipotezinin BRIC ülkelerinde geçerli olduğunu, MINT
ülkelerinde ise geçerli olmadığını göstermektedir.  

References

  • AKINCI, M. ve YILMAZ, Ö., 2013, Türkiye Ekonomisinde Üçüz Açık Hipotezinin Geçerliliği: Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı, İMKB Dergisi, 13 (50), 1-27.
  • ALKSVANI, M. A., 2000, The Twin Deficit Phenomenon in Petroleum Economy, Evidence From Saudi Arabia [Online], King Saud University Department of Economıcs, 1-25, http://www.erf.org.eg/CMS/uploads/pdf/1185358196_finance1.pdf [Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2015].
  • BAHARUMSHAH, A. Z. ve EVAN L., 2007, Dynamics of Fiscal and Current Account Deficits in Thailand: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Economic Studies, 34 (6), 454-475.
  • BOLAT, S., DEĞİRMEN S. ve ŞENGÖNÜL A., 2015, The Dynamics of Triple Deficits in European Countries: New Insights from Panel Granger Causality Tests [Online], 22nd International Economic Conference, Romania. <http://www.soc.uoc.gr/macro/docs/Year/2015/papers/paper_4_118.pdf> [Erişim Tarihi: 20.11.2015].
  • CHOWDHURY, K. ve SALEH. A. S., 2007, Testing the Keynesian Proposition of Twin Deficits in the Presence of Trade Liberalisation: Evidence from Sri Lanka, Wollongong Economics Working Paper, No: 07-09, 1-33.
  • ÇELİK, S. ve DENİZ, P., 2009, An Empirical Investigation of Twin Deficits Hypothesis for Six Emerging Countries [Online], SSRN Working Paper Series, Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1389242 [Erişim Tarihi: 21.08.2015].
  • DARRAT, F. A., 1988, Have Large Budge Deficits Caused Rising Trade Deficits?, Southern Economic Journal, 54 (4), 879-887.
  • DUMITRESCU, E-I. ve HURLİN, C., 2012, Testing for Granger non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels, Economic Modelling, 29 (4), 1450–1460.
  • EISNER, R., 1994, National Saving and Budget Deficits, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76 (1), 181-186.
  • FISHER, S. ve EASTERLY, W., 1990, The Economics of The Government Budget Constraint, The World Bank Research Observer, 5 (2), 127-142.
  • GRANGER, C. W. J., 1969, Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Modelsand Cross Spectral Method, Econometrica, 37, 424–438.
  • GÜLOĞLU, B. ve İSPİR, S., 2009, Yeni Gelişmeler Işığında Türkiye’de Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi Önsavının Panel Birim Kök Sınaması, Pamukkale Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F.İktisat Bölümü Yayınları.
  • HADRI, K. ve KUROZUMI, E., 2012, A Simple Panel Stationarity Test in the Presence of Serial Correlation and a Common Factor, Economics Letters, 115, 31–34.
  • HSIAO, C., 2003, Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • KARAÇOR, Z., ALPTEKİN, V., AKAR, T. ve AKAR, G., 2012, İstikrar Mı, İstikrarsızlık Mı? Türkiye’de Üçüz Açık Analizi, Türkiye Ekonomisi Kurumu 3. Uluslararası Ekonomi Konferansı, “Borç Dinamikleri, Finansal İstikrarsızlık ve Büyük Durgunluk”, 1-3 Kasım 2012, İzmir.
  • KWIATKOWSKI, D., P.C.B. PHILLIPS, P., SCHMIDT, Y. S., 1992, Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root, Journal of Econometrics, North-Holland, 54, 159-178.
  • MCTEER, B., 2008, Our Triple Deficits [Online], National Center for Policy Analysis, No: 613, 1-2, http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba613 [Erişim Tarihi: 29.08.2015].
  • ÖZDEMİR, D., BUZDAĞLI Ö,. EMSEN, Ö. S. ve ÇELİK A. A., 2014, Geçiş Ekonomilerinde Üçüz Açık Hipotezinin Geçerliliği, International Conference on Eurasian Economies, 1-7.
  • PESARAN, M. H., 2004, General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels [Online], University of Cambridge Working Paper, Paper No.0435, http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/research/ repec /cam/pdf/cwpe0435.pdf, [Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2014]
  • PESARAN, M. H., ve YAMAGATA, T., 2008, Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels, Journal of Econometrics, 142, 50–93.
  • ROUBINI, N., 1988, Current Account and Budget Deficits in an Intertemporal Model of Consumption and Taxation Smoothing: A Solution to the ‘Feldstein Horioka Puzzle?, NBER Working Paper, No. 2773.
  • SÜREKÇİ, D., 2011, Türkiye’de Üçüz Açıklar Olgusunun Analizi: Dinamik Bir Yaklaşım, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 18 (1), 51-59.
  • TANG, T. C., 2014, Fiscal Deficit, Trade Deficit and Financial Account Deficit: Triple Deficits Hypotesis with the U.S. Experience, Business and Economics, Discussion Paper 06/14, 1-13.
  • TÜLÜMCE, S. Y., 2013, Türkiye’de Üçüz Açığın Ampirik Analizi (1984-2010), Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 165, 97-114.
  • ZAIDI, I. M., 1985, Saving Investment, Fiscal Deficit and the External Indebtedness of Developing Countries, World Development, 13 (5), 573-588.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Feyza Balan This is me

Publication Date January 29, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016

Cite

APA Balan, F. (2016). BRIC VE MINT EKONOMİLERİNDE ÜÇÜZ AÇIK HİPOTEZİNİN AMPİRİK ANALİZİ. Journal of Life Economics, 3(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.119