ChatGPT Use by Nursing Students and Their Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence: Current Situation Analysis

Hale Sezer; Hande Yağcan

doi:10.62425/jmefm.1735129

ChatGPT Use by Nursing Students and Their Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence: Current Situation Analysis

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To explore nursing students' usage patterns of ChatGPT and their preparedness for engaging with artificial intelligence technologies. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. Data were collected between March and June 2023 from nursing students aged ≥18 years on social media (Instagram and Facebook) and WhatsApp student groups in Türkiye. A total of 346 nursing students who voluntarily agreed to participate in the research and filled out the online form constituted the study sample. Study data were collected online via a questionnaire that was created on Google Forms and consisted of a descriptive information form and the medical artificial intelligence readiness scale. While the form was designed, the confidentiality of the students’ data was considered. Independent samples t tests and one-way ANOVA were employed for data analysis. The statistical significance level was set at .05. Results: A total of 65% (n=225) of the nursing students had never heard about ChatGPT, 79.2% (n= 274) had not tried ChatGPT, and 90.2% (n=312) had not prepared homework, articles, papers, or translations using software containing artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT. The average scores obtained by the nursing students on the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale were as follows: 73.09 ± 12.98 for the overall scale, 23.95 ± 5.27 for the cognition subscale, 28.4 ± 5.47 for ability, 10.07 ± 2.37 for vision, and 10.65 ± 2.11 for the ethics component. Conclusion: As the use of artificial intelligence software among nursing students was low, male students were more prone to use artificial intelligence than were female students, and most of the students thought that these software packages were ethical and usable. Future studies should determine the status of artificial intelligence use among nursing students and their readiness by employing different active teaching methods according to their school year.

Keywords

References

OpenAI. Introducing ChatGPT. OpenAI. 2022. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/Alkhaqani
The Gurdian. ChatGPT reaches 100 million users two months after launch. The Gurdian Newspaper. 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/02/chatgpt-100-million-users-open-ai-fastest-growing-app
Alkhaqani, AL. Potential Benefits and Challenges of ChatGPT in Future Nursing Education. Maaen J Med Sci. 2023;2(2):1-5.
Tam W, Huynh T, Tang A, Luong S, Khatri Y, Zhou W. Nursing education in the age of artificial intelligence powered Chatbots (AI-Chatbots): Are we ready yet? Nurse Educ Today. 2023;129(2023):105917. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105917
Gunawan J. Exploring the future of nursing : Insights from the ChatGPT model. Belitung Nurs J. 2023;9(1):1-5.
Rudolph J, Tan S, Tan S. ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? J App Learn & Teach. 2023;6(1):1-22. doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Orth T. What Americans think about ChatGPT and AI-generated text. YouGov. 2023. https://today.yougov.com/topics/technology/articles-reports/2023/02/01/what-americans-think-about-chatgpt-and-ai-text
Aktay S, Gök S, Uzunoğlu D. ChatGPT in Education. Türk Akademik Yayınlar Dergisi (TAY journal). 2023;7(2):378-406. doi:10.29329/tayjournal.2023.543.03

Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Med. 2019;25(January):44-56. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
Rezazadeh H, Ahmadipour H, Salajegheh M. Psychometric evaluation of Persian version of medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(527):1-7.
Anyoha R. The History of Artificial Intelligence. Harvard University. 2017. https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/history-artificial-intelligence/
Peng H, Ma S, Spector JM. Personalized adaptive learning: An emerging pedagogical approach enabled by a smart learning environment. Smart Learn Environ. 2019;6(1):9.
Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? Int J Educ Technol H. 2019;16(39):1-27. doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Khan RA, Jawaid M, Khan AR, Sajjad M. ChatGPT-Reshaping medical education and clinical management. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2023;39(2):605-607. doi:10.12669/pjms.39.2.7653
Kie Chan MM, Fun Wong IS, Yau SY, Fun Lam VS. Critical reflection on using ChatGPT in student Learning. Nurse Educator. 2023;0(0):1-2. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.976863
Wingard J. ChatGPT: A threat to higher education? Forbes. 2023. Accessed August 23, 2023. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonwingard/2023/01/10/chatgpt-a-threat-to-higher-education/?sh¼5275514d1e76
Yi Chang C, Hwang GJ, Gau ML. Promoting students’ learning achievement and efficacy : A mobile chatbot approach for nursing training. British J Educ Technol. 2022;53:171-188. doi:10.1111/bjet.13158
Rodriguez-Arrastia M, Martinez-Ortigosa A, Ruiz-Gonzalez C, Ropero-Padilla C, Roman P, Sanchez-Labraca N. Experiences and perceptions of final-year nursing students of using a chatbot in a simulated emergency situation : A qualitative study. J Nurs Manag. 2022;30:3874-3884. doi:10.1111/jonm.13630
Han JW, Park J, Lee H. Analysis of the effect of an artificial intelligence chatbot educational program on non-face-to-face classes: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):1-10. doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03898-3
Irwin P, Jones D, Fealy S. What is ChatGPT and what do we do with it? Implications of the age of AI for nursing and midwifery practice and education: An editorial. Nurse Educ Today. 2023;127(2023):105835. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105835
Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Int Res. 2004;6(3):1-6. doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
Cohen ER, Pen S, Misztal C, et al. N95 vs Half-face Respirator Wear in Surgical Trainees: Physiologic and Psychological Effects of Prolonged Use. American Acad Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;5(4):1-10. doi:10.1177/2473974X211065437
Stathakarou N, Nifakos S, Karlgren K, et al. Students’ perceptions on chatbots’ potential and design characteristics in healthcare education. In: Mantas J, Hasman A, Househ M, Gallos P, Zoulias E, eds. The Importance of Health Informatics in Public Health during a Pandemic Mantas. Vol 0. IOS Press; 2020:209-212. doi:10.3233/SHTI200531
Mokmin NAM, Ibrahim NA. The evaluation of chatbot as a tool for health literacy education among undergraduate students. Educ Infor Technol. 2021;26(5):6033-6049. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10542-y
Karaca O, Çalışkan SA, Demir K. Medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students (MAIRS-MS) – development, validity and reliability study. BMC Medl Educ. 2021;21(1):1-9. doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02546-6
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson; 2013.
Laupichler MC, Hadizadeh DR, Wintergerst MWM, et al. Effect of a flipped classroom course to foster medical students ’ AI literacy with a focus on medical imaging : a single group pre and post test study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(803):1-9. doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03866-x
Aboalshamat K, Alhuzali R, Alalyani A, et al. Medical and Dental Professionals Readiness for Artificial Intelligence for Saudi Arabia Vision 2030. Int J Pharmac Res & Allied Sci. 2022;11(4):52-59.
Doumat G, Daher D, Ghanem N nicolas, Khater B. Knowledge and attitudes of medical students in Lebanon toward artificial intelligence: A national survey study. Frontiers in AI. 2022;5:1015418.
Jha N, Shankar PR, Al-betar MA, Mukhia R, Hada K, Palaian S. Undergraduate Medical Students ’ and Interns ’ Knowledge and Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Adv Medi Educ Pract. 2022;13(August):927-937.
Xu T, Weng H, Liu F, Yang L, Luo Y, Ding Z, Wang Q. Current status of ChatGPT use in medical education: potentials, challenges, and strategies. J Med Int Res. 2024;26:e57896.
Peng W, Cheng X, Deng J, Zhang X. ChatGPT applications in nursing: Current status and future perspectives. Nurs Open. 2025;12(6):e70253.
Xuan PY, Ismath M, Fahumida F, et al. Readiness Towards Artificial Intelligence Among Undergraduate Medical Students in Malaysia. Educ Med J. 2023;15(2):49-60. doi:10.21315/eimj2023.15.2.4
Gray K, Slavotinek J, Dimaguila GL, Choo D. Artificial Intelligence Education for the Health Workforce: Expert Survey of Approaches and Needs. MIR Med Educ. 2022;8(2).
Taskiran N. Effect of Artificial Intelligence Course in Nursing on Students’ Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness: A Comparative Quasi-Experimental Study. Nurse Educ. 2023;48(5):E147-E152.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Medical Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Hale Sezer ^*
0000-0003-4199-7727
Türkiye

Hande Yağcan
0000-0001-9658-0449
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 25, 2025

Submission Date

July 18, 2025

Acceptance Date

October 21, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 2 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.62425/jmefm.1735129

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA72FY87XF

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Sezer, H., & Yağcan, H. (2025). ChatGPT Use by Nursing Students and Their Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence: Current Situation Analysis. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine, 2(3), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.62425/jmefm.1735129

AMA

1.Sezer H, Yağcan H. ChatGPT Use by Nursing Students and Their Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence: Current Situation Analysis. J Med Educ Family Med. 2025;2(3):99-107. doi:10.62425/jmefm.1735129

Chicago

Sezer, Hale, and Hande Yağcan. 2025. “ChatGPT Use by Nursing Students and Their Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence: Current Situation Analysis”. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine 2 (3): 99-107. https://doi.org/10.62425/jmefm.1735129.

EndNote

Sezer H, Yağcan H (December 1, 2025) ChatGPT Use by Nursing Students and Their Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence: Current Situation Analysis. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine 2 3 99–107.

IEEE

[1]H. Sezer and H. Yağcan, “ChatGPT Use by Nursing Students and Their Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence: Current Situation Analysis”, J Med Educ Family Med, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 99–107, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.62425/jmefm.1735129.

ISNAD

Sezer, Hale - Yağcan, Hande. “ChatGPT Use by Nursing Students and Their Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence: Current Situation Analysis”. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine 2/3 (December 1, 2025): 99-107. https://doi.org/10.62425/jmefm.1735129.

JAMA

1.Sezer H, Yağcan H. ChatGPT Use by Nursing Students and Their Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence: Current Situation Analysis. J Med Educ Family Med. 2025;2:99–107.

MLA

Sezer, Hale, and Hande Yağcan. “ChatGPT Use by Nursing Students and Their Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence: Current Situation Analysis”. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine, vol. 2, no. 3, Dec. 2025, pp. 99-107, doi:10.62425/jmefm.1735129.

Vancouver

1.Hale Sezer, Hande Yağcan. ChatGPT Use by Nursing Students and Their Readiness Levels for Artificial Intelligence: Current Situation Analysis. J Med Educ Family Med. 2025 Dec. 1;2(3):99-107. doi:10.62425/jmefm.1735129