Perception and challenges of the mentor-mentee programme in a medical college of Prayagraj, India: an observational, cross-sectional, mixed-method study

Anjani Kumar Srivastava; Anjali Singh; Anuj Singh; Neha Singh Chauhan

doi:10.62425/jmefm.1912271

Perception and challenges of the mentor-mentee programme in a medical college of Prayagraj, India: an observational, cross-sectional, mixed-method study

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate perceptions and challenges regarding the National Medical Commission-mandated Mentor-Mentee Programme among undergraduate medical students and faculty in Prayagraj, India. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional mixed methods study was done between August 2025 and January 2026 at the United Institute of Medical Sciences. Employing universal sampling, pre-validated semi-structured questionnaires were filled by 411 MBBS mentees and 103 faculty mentors. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, whilst qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. Results: Despite 89.5% of mentees confirming mentor assignment, 71.8% reported no meetings in the preceding six months. Overall satisfaction was low, reported by only 26.8% of mentees and 36.9% of mentors. Both cohorts strongly acknowledged the program's intrinsic conceptual value for academic guidance and emotional support. However, significant implementation barriers were identified: time constraints dominated qualitative themes (comprising 50–60% of reported problems), followed by the absence of structured schedules (agreed upon by 64.5% of mentees), and inadequate institutional support. Consequently, 55.7% of mentees perceived the initiative as existing solely "on paper". Mentors echoed these logistical hurdles, with 46.6% reporting infrequent or no interactions with their mentees. Conclusion: While theoretically valued, the current mentoring program functions nominally rather than practically due to systemic and logistical barriers. Optimising this initiative demands urgent institutional reforms, including mandatory, timetabled sessions, digital communication tools, and robust oversight mechanisms to support holistic student development.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

United Institute of Medical Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India

Project Number

Not Applicable

Ethical Statement

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) of UIMS, Prayagraj (Approval No. UIMS/IEC/EC/2025/18, dated October 10, 2025)

Thanks

I would like to thank the participants for their co-operation without which this study would never be completed.

References

Standing Committee on Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education. Supporting doctors and dentists at work: an enquiry into mentoring. London: SCOPME; 1998.
Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1977. Available from: http://www.asecib.ase.ro/mps/Bandura_SocialLearningTheory.pdf [cited 2026 Apr 28].
Ragins BR, Kram KE. The landscape of mentoring in the 21st century. In: Ragins BR, Kram KE, editors. The handbook of mentoring at work: theory, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2007. p. 659–692.
Frei E, Stamm M, Buddeberg-Fischer B. Mentoring programs for medical students--a review of the PubMed literature 2000-2008. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:32.
National Medical Commission. Competency Based Medical Education Curriculum (CBME) Guidelines. New Delhi: NMC; 2023.
Kukreja S, Chhabra N, Kaur A, Arora R, Singh T. Introducing mentoring to 1st-year medical students of a private medical college in North India: a pilot study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2017;7(Suppl 1):S67-S71.
Sparshadeep EM, Kavana GV, Sheeba DKP. Qualitative study on perception of first-year medical undergraduates toward mentorship program. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2019;9(9):884-892.
Guhan N, Krishnan P, Dharshini P, Abraham P, Thomas S. The effect of mentorship program in enhancing the academic performance of first MBBS students. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020;8(4):196-199.

Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among U.S. and Canadian medical students. Acad Med. 2006;81(4):354-373.
World Federation for Medical Education. Basic Medical Education WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement. Copenhagen: WFME; 2015.
Xaviour R, Sruthi MV. Students’ perspectives on the mentorship program implemented for first year MBBS students: a cross sectional study. Int J Commun Med Public Health. 2022;9(5):2152-2156.
Kalén S, Ponzer S, Silén C. The core of mentorship: medical students' experiences of one-to-one mentoring in a clinical environment. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17(3):389-402.
Indian Council of Medical Research. National ethical guidelines for biomedical and health research involving human participants. New Delhi: ICMR; 2017.
Jiwan A, Oberoi A. Evaluation of the existing undergraduate mentorship program. Adesh Univ J Med Sci Res. 2025;7:127-131.
Ahmed SK, Mohammed RA, Nashwan AJ, Ibrahim RH, Abdalla AQ, Ameen BMM, et al. Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. J Med Surg Public Health. 2025;6:100198.
Waseem SMA, Abedi AJ, Husaini SHM. Evaluating student feedback on the MBBS mentorship program in a medical college. J Med Edu Dev. 2024;17(55):86-96.
Krishnankutty Nair P. The perceptions and experiences of medical faculty on the undergraduate mentoring system. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e72242.
Kandasamy S, Gopalakrishnan S, Elangovan H, Muthukumar G. Evaluation of a formal mentorship program in government medical college using Delphi technique: explanatory sequential mixed method study. Muller J Med Sci Res. 2025;16(1):46-52.
Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusic A. A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(1):72–78.
Sharma S, Jaiman A, Nagar M, Panwar M, Sharma N, Jaiman A. Practical challenges in the implementation of the NMC mentorship program for MBBS students in India and its potential solutions. Ann VMMC Safdarjung Hosp. 2025;1(1):9-12.
Udhayakumar KP, Adhimoolam M, Kuppusamy T. Exploration of mentees' perception of mentoring among undergraduate medical students: a cross-sectional study. Natl Board Exam J Med Sci. 2023;1(7):425-440.
National Medical Commission. Report of the National Task Force on Mental Health and Well-being of Medical Students. New Delhi: NMC; 2024. Available from: https://www.nmc.org.in/ActivitiWebClient/open/getDocument?path=/Documents/Public/Portal/LatestNews/NTF%20Report%20FINAL%20August%2013%202024.pdf [Accessed 21 January 2026].

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Medical Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Anjani Kumar Srivastava ^*
0000-0003-3191-5169
India

Anjali Singh
0000-0002-3781-381X
India

Anuj Singh
0000-0001-8661-2013
India

Neha Singh Chauhan
0000-0001-9961-8991
India

Publication Date

April 30, 2026

Submission Date

March 19, 2026

Acceptance Date

April 29, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 3 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.62425/jmefm.1912271

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA47UY38GA

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Srivastava, A. K., Singh, A., Singh, A., & Chauhan, N. S. (2026). Perception and challenges of the mentor-mentee programme in a medical college of Prayagraj, India: an observational, cross-sectional, mixed-method study. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine, 3(1), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.62425/jmefm.1912271

AMA

1.Srivastava AK, Singh A, Singh A, Chauhan NS. Perception and challenges of the mentor-mentee programme in a medical college of Prayagraj, India: an observational, cross-sectional, mixed-method study. J Med Educ Family Med. 2026;3(1):31-37. doi:10.62425/jmefm.1912271

Chicago

Srivastava, Anjani Kumar, Anjali Singh, Anuj Singh, and Neha Singh Chauhan. 2026. “Perception and Challenges of the Mentor-Mentee Programme in a Medical College of Prayagraj, India: An Observational, Cross-Sectional, Mixed-Method Study”. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine 3 (1): 31-37. https://doi.org/10.62425/jmefm.1912271.

EndNote

Srivastava AK, Singh A, Singh A, Chauhan NS (April 1, 2026) Perception and challenges of the mentor-mentee programme in a medical college of Prayagraj, India: an observational, cross-sectional, mixed-method study. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine 3 1 31–37.

IEEE

[1]A. K. Srivastava, A. Singh, A. Singh, and N. S. Chauhan, “Perception and challenges of the mentor-mentee programme in a medical college of Prayagraj, India: an observational, cross-sectional, mixed-method study”, J Med Educ Family Med, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 31–37, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.62425/jmefm.1912271.

ISNAD

Srivastava, Anjani Kumar - Singh, Anjali - Singh, Anuj - Chauhan, Neha Singh. “Perception and Challenges of the Mentor-Mentee Programme in a Medical College of Prayagraj, India: An Observational, Cross-Sectional, Mixed-Method Study”. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine 3/1 (April 1, 2026): 31-37. https://doi.org/10.62425/jmefm.1912271.

JAMA

1.Srivastava AK, Singh A, Singh A, Chauhan NS. Perception and challenges of the mentor-mentee programme in a medical college of Prayagraj, India: an observational, cross-sectional, mixed-method study. J Med Educ Family Med. 2026;3:31–37.

MLA

Srivastava, Anjani Kumar, et al. “Perception and Challenges of the Mentor-Mentee Programme in a Medical College of Prayagraj, India: An Observational, Cross-Sectional, Mixed-Method Study”. Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, Apr. 2026, pp. 31-37, doi:10.62425/jmefm.1912271.

Vancouver

1.Anjani Kumar Srivastava, Anjali Singh, Anuj Singh, Neha Singh Chauhan. Perception and challenges of the mentor-mentee programme in a medical college of Prayagraj, India: an observational, cross-sectional, mixed-method study. J Med Educ Family Med. 2026 Apr. 1;3(1):31-7. doi:10.62425/jmefm.1912271