Comparison of microbiological results of deep tissue biopsy and superficial swab in diabetic foot infections

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare superficial swab cultures with deep tissue biopsy cultures and also to evaluate the reliability of superficial swap cultures in diabetic foot infected patients. Materials and methods: To compare two culture methods, the hospitalized patients with diabetic foot infections were retrospectively evaluated at Dicle University and Diyarbakir Education and Research Hospital, between October 2009 and November 2010. The patients were divided two groups as with osteomyelitis (osteomyelitis group, Wagner &ge;3) and with soft tissue infections (soft tissue infection (STI) group, Wagner <3). The cultures of deep tissue biopsy specimens and swab samples were collected from all patients. Results: In 75 patients with osteomyelitis, the compatibility rate in deep tissue biopsy culture with superficial swab culture was 58.7% whereas in STI group this rate was 89.1% (p<0.001). Of 41 superficial swap cultures, 33 of them (81%) had the same microorganisms with the identified microorganisms in deep tissue cultures. Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant pathogen isolated from deep tissue biopsy cultures and also from superficial swap cultures. The distributions of microorganisms in deep tissue culture and swap cultures were similar. Conclusions: This study indicates that superficial swab culture could be valuable to identify the pathogens in infected diabetic wounds without osteomyelitis. The accuracy of swab specimens diminishes when osteomyelitis develops. Deep tissue culture seems more sensitive and reliable in osteomyelitis group.

Keywords

• Diabetic foot infection, Wagner Grading System, deep tissue culture, swab culture.

Comparison of microbiological results of deep tissue biopsy and superficial swab in diabetic foot infections

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

References

1. Joseph WS, Lipsky BA. Medical therapy of diabetic foot infec- tions. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2010;100:395-400.
2. Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Deery HG et al. Diagnosis and treat- ment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:885- 910.
3. Cavanagh PR, Lipsky BA, Bradbury AW, Botek G. Treatment for diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet 2005; 366:1725-1735.
4. Levin ME. Management of Diabetic Foot: Preventing Amputa- tion. South Med J 2002; 95 :10-20.
5. Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Embil J, De Lalla F. Diagnosing and treating diabetic foot infections. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2004; 20:56-64.
6. Ertugrul B, Baktiroglu S. Diyabetik ayak infeksiyonu. Klimik Dergisi 2005; 18; 6-13.
7. Mackowiak PA, Jones SR, Smith JW. Diagnostic value of si- nus-tract cultures in chronic osteomyelitis. J Am Med Assoc 1978; 239: 2772- 2775.
8. Sharp CS, Bessman AN, Wagner FW Jr, Garland D. Micro- biology of deep tissue in diabetic gangrene. Diabetes Care 1978; 1:289- 292.

9. Sharp GS, Bessman AN, Wagner FW Jr, Garland D, Reece E. Microbiology of superficial and deep tissues in infected dia- betic gangrene. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1979; 149: 217-219.
10. Sapico FL, Canawati HN, Witte JL, Montogomerie JZ, Wag- ner FW Jr, Bessman AN. Quantitative aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology of infected diabetic feet. J Clin Microbiol 1980; 12: 413-420.
11. Sapico FL, WitteJL, Canawati HN, Montgomerie JZ, Bess- man AN. The infected foot of the diabetic patient: quantitative microbiology and analysis of clinical features. Rev Infect Dis 1984; 6: 5171 -5176.
12. Lipsky BA, Pecoraro RE, Larson SA, Hanley ME, Ahroni JH. Outpatient management of uncomplicated lower-extremity infections in diabetic patients. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 790-797.
13. Slater R.A, Lazarovitch T, Boldur I, et al. Swab cultures ac- curately identify bacterial pathogens in diabetic foot wounds not involving bone. Diabet Med 2004; 21: 705-709.
14. Pellizzer G, Strazzabosco M, Presi S, et al. Deep tissue biop- sy vs. superficial swab culture monitoring in the microbiologi- cal assessment of limb- threatening diabetic foot infection. Diabet Med 2001;18, 822-827.
15. Kessler L, Piemont Y, Ortega F, et al. Comparison of micro- biological results of needle puncture vs. superficial swab infected diabetic foot ulcer with osteomyelitis. Diabet Med 2005; 23, 99-102.
16. Senneville E. Culture of percutaneous bone biopsy speci- mens for diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Concor- dance with ulcer swab cultures. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42; 57-62.
17. Senneville E. Needle puncture and transcutaneous bone bi- opsy cultures are inconsistent in patients with diabetes and suspected osteomyelitis of the foot. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48; 888-893.