Purpose- The pandemic resulted in an unexpected volume of customer demand for quick delivery of grocery products. This, in turn, caused a
terrific increase in the burden of delivery employees working for quick commerce (q-commerce) retailers. There was much news about working
conditions of couriers during the pandemic. In this study, under the theoretical guidelines of the Stimulus-Organism-Response model (SOR), the
author aims to investigate how information regarding working conditions (stimuli) affect evaluation of brand reputation (organism) and retail
patronage intention (response). The framework of the study is limited to q-commerce grocery retailers because of their significant growth
potential.
Methodology- A within-subjects experimental design was implemented to collect data. The author developed two scenarios based on true events.
In the scenarios, two hypothetical q-commerce retailers were narrated to manipulate good and poor working conditions of delivery employees.
Paired sample t-tests were conducted to test the mean differences of brand reputation and retail patronage intention. Additionally, two separate
studies were conducted to test what if a q-commerce grocery retailer with good working conditions also set higher prices.
Findings- The findings show that the brand reputation of q-commerce grocery retailers with good working conditions is higher. Similarly, customers
show higher retail patronage intention for q-commerce grocery retailers with good working conditions. The results are valid even if the prices of
q-commerce grocery retailers with good working conditions are higher.
Conclusion- The current article is one of the first empirical studies on q-commerce retailers. The study also contributes by providing new insights
about consumer reactions to poor working conditions of retailers under extraordinary circumstances from which they also suffer. Poor working
conditions cause to lose customers besides the ethical considerations, but retention of customers is a must for the survival of infant q-commerce
retailers.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Business Administration |
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | December 31, 2021 |
Published in Issue | Year 2021 |
Journal of Management,
Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed,
quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing
months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages
of the Journal are English and Turkish. JMML aims to provide a research source
for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in
the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management,
international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that
cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest
areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.