BibTex RIS Cite

THE IMPACT OF CAREER SUCCESS ON WORK LIFE BALANCE FOR MILLENNIUM GENERATION

Year 2016, , 97 - 104, 30.06.2016
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016219938

Abstract

Today’s workplace consists of mainly four generations; silence, baby boomer, X and Y generations. Although each generation has different values, beliefs, point of views, they are working altogether. This demographic diversity has brought many opportunities but also challenges for the organization. In order to manage the opportunities and challenges in the workplace which the varieties of generations bring up, each generation should be very well understood. Otherwise it can cause problems which in turn may influence the productivity and efficiency of the organization. As time passes and the new generation – Millennium- is appeared it in the workplace, the needs’ and perceptions’ of the employees also start to change too. Managing both work and private life in balance becomes important for the employees. Thus, the notion of work life balance has been started to handle by the managers. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact and consequences of work-life balance for generation Millennium which is the youngest majority of current workforce by considering their values, and their perceptions and expectations from their career success.

 

References

  • Anon., 2014. GOV.UK. [Online] Available at: www.gov.uk/flexible-working/overview, [Accessed 10 March 2015].
  • Anon., 2006. TISK. [Online] Available at: http://tisk.org.tr/tr/Tisk-Duyuru-Detay/820 , [Accessed 10 March 2015].
  • Ashkenas, R., Ulrich, D., Jick, T., and Kerr, S. (1995). The Boundaryless Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
  • Arnold, J. and Cohen, L. (2008). The psychology of careers in industrial-organizational settings: A critical but appreciative analysis. In G.P. Hodgkinson and J.K. Ford (Eds.) International Review of Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Vol. 23 (pp.1–44). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Baruch, Y. (2006). Career development in organizations and beyond: Balancing traditional and contemporary viewpoints. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 125-138.
  • Cole, G., Lucas, L. and Smith, R., 2002. The debut of generation y in the american workforce. Journal of Business Administration Online, 1(2), pp. 1-10.
  • Fagnani, J. and Letablier, M.-T., 2004. Work and Family Life Balance-The Impact of 35.
  • Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M. and Shaw, J. D., 2003. The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), pp. 510-531.
  • Hughes, J. and Bozionelos, N., 2007. Work-life balance as source of job dissatisfaction and withdrawal attitudes: An exploratory study on the views of male workers. Personnel Review, 36(1), pp. 145-154.
  • Judge, T. A. and Watanabe, S., 1993. Another look an the job satisfaction-life satisfaction relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), pp. 939-948.
  • Leo, J., 2003. The good-news generation. U.S. News and World Repo, 135(15), pp. 60-61.
  • Patterson, C. (2007). The impact of generational diversity in the workplace. The Diversity Factor, 15(3), 17-22.
  • Polach, J. L. (2004). Understanding the experience of college graduates during their first year of employment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 5-23.
  • Raines, C., 2002. Connecting generations: The sourcebook for a new workplace. Berkeley, CA: Crisp.
  • Rosenbaum, J. L. (1979). Tournament mobility: Career patterns in a corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 221–241.
  • Seibert, S. E., and Kraimer, M. L. (2001). The fivefactor model of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 1–21.
  • Scheiman, S., Milkie, M. A. and Glavin, P., 2009. When work interferes wwith life: Work-nonwork interference and the influence of work-related demands and resources. American Sociological Review, 74(6), pp. 966-988.
  • Schabracq, M. J., Winnubst, J. A. and Cooper, G. L., 2004. The Handbook of Work and Health Psychology. 2nd ed. s.l.:Wiley.
  • Sujansky, J., 2004. Leading a multi-generational workforce. Occupational Health and Safety, 73(4), pp. 16-18.
  • Wiese, B. S., Freund, A. M., and Baltes, P. B. (2002). Subjective career success and emotional well-being: Longitudinal predictive power of selection, optimization, and compensation. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 60, 321–335.
  • Weston, M., 2006. Integrating generational perspectives in nursing. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 11(2), pp. 12-22.
Year 2016, , 97 - 104, 30.06.2016
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016219938

Abstract

References

  • Anon., 2014. GOV.UK. [Online] Available at: www.gov.uk/flexible-working/overview, [Accessed 10 March 2015].
  • Anon., 2006. TISK. [Online] Available at: http://tisk.org.tr/tr/Tisk-Duyuru-Detay/820 , [Accessed 10 March 2015].
  • Ashkenas, R., Ulrich, D., Jick, T., and Kerr, S. (1995). The Boundaryless Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
  • Arnold, J. and Cohen, L. (2008). The psychology of careers in industrial-organizational settings: A critical but appreciative analysis. In G.P. Hodgkinson and J.K. Ford (Eds.) International Review of Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Vol. 23 (pp.1–44). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Baruch, Y. (2006). Career development in organizations and beyond: Balancing traditional and contemporary viewpoints. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 125-138.
  • Cole, G., Lucas, L. and Smith, R., 2002. The debut of generation y in the american workforce. Journal of Business Administration Online, 1(2), pp. 1-10.
  • Fagnani, J. and Letablier, M.-T., 2004. Work and Family Life Balance-The Impact of 35.
  • Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M. and Shaw, J. D., 2003. The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), pp. 510-531.
  • Hughes, J. and Bozionelos, N., 2007. Work-life balance as source of job dissatisfaction and withdrawal attitudes: An exploratory study on the views of male workers. Personnel Review, 36(1), pp. 145-154.
  • Judge, T. A. and Watanabe, S., 1993. Another look an the job satisfaction-life satisfaction relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), pp. 939-948.
  • Leo, J., 2003. The good-news generation. U.S. News and World Repo, 135(15), pp. 60-61.
  • Patterson, C. (2007). The impact of generational diversity in the workplace. The Diversity Factor, 15(3), 17-22.
  • Polach, J. L. (2004). Understanding the experience of college graduates during their first year of employment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 5-23.
  • Raines, C., 2002. Connecting generations: The sourcebook for a new workplace. Berkeley, CA: Crisp.
  • Rosenbaum, J. L. (1979). Tournament mobility: Career patterns in a corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 221–241.
  • Seibert, S. E., and Kraimer, M. L. (2001). The fivefactor model of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 1–21.
  • Scheiman, S., Milkie, M. A. and Glavin, P., 2009. When work interferes wwith life: Work-nonwork interference and the influence of work-related demands and resources. American Sociological Review, 74(6), pp. 966-988.
  • Schabracq, M. J., Winnubst, J. A. and Cooper, G. L., 2004. The Handbook of Work and Health Psychology. 2nd ed. s.l.:Wiley.
  • Sujansky, J., 2004. Leading a multi-generational workforce. Occupational Health and Safety, 73(4), pp. 16-18.
  • Wiese, B. S., Freund, A. M., and Baltes, P. B. (2002). Subjective career success and emotional well-being: Longitudinal predictive power of selection, optimization, and compensation. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 60, 321–335.
  • Weston, M., 2006. Integrating generational perspectives in nursing. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 11(2), pp. 12-22.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Demet Leblebici Aydin This is me

Publication Date June 30, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016

Cite

APA Aydin, D. L. (2016). THE IMPACT OF CAREER SUCCESS ON WORK LIFE BALANCE FOR MILLENNIUM GENERATION. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 3(2), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016219938

Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JMML aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management, international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.


Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.