Abstract
Purpose - Liberalization policies of 1980s had transforming and accelerating influence over the formation of Anatolian capital. Taking innovativeness as granted, New Regionalist studies especially on Turkish SMEs explains the reasons of this development. The aim of this article is to evaluate concerning literature and concepts of development style of (Afterwards so called) Anatolian Tigers.
Methodology - This research is based on methodology of secondary data analysis: selection and discussion of theoretical and descriptive material, in context, and detailed comparison of theories in terms of their applicability.
Findings- Briefly factors to the economic rise of Anatolian Tigers are New industrial spaces conceptualization, Flexible Specialization, Changing aspect of international division of labour, Core-periphery paradigm.
Conclusion- Anatolian Tigers development process is reflect of liberalization term of 1980’s, opening Turkey’s doors to the global economy. This development model and the way they integrate to the world economy is unique development style of T
References
- Adas, E. B. (2006). The making of entrepreneurial Islam and the Islamic spirit of capitalism. Journal for Cultural Research, 10(2), 113-137.
- Bayırbağ, M. K. (2010). Local entrepreneurialism and state rescaling in Turkey. Urban Studies, 47(2), 363-385.
- Çokgezen, M. (2000). New fragmentations and new cooperations in the Turkish bourgeoisie. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(5), 525-544.
- Demirdag, I. (2015). Entrepreneurship and regional economic sevelopment: evidence on Turkish regions. METU: Ankara, Turkey.
- Duruiz, L., & Yentürk, N. (1993). Facing the challenge: Turkish automobile, steel and clothing industries' responses to post‐fordist restructuring. Development Policy Review, 11(3), 289-304.
- Eraydın, A. (2001). The roles of central government policies and the new forms of local governance in the emergence of industrial districts. Promoting Local Growth: Process, Practice and Policy, 81-101.
- Eraydın, A. (2002). Yeni sanayi odakları: Yerel kalkınmanın yeniden kavramlaştırılması. ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi.
- Eraydin, A. & Armatli-Köroğlu, B. (2005). Innovation, networking and the new industrial clusters: the characteristics of networks and local innovation capabilities in the Turkish industrial clusters. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 17(4), 237-266.
- Hoffman, O. and Kaplinsky, C. (1988). Driving force: the global restructuring of technology, labour and investment in the automobile and components industries. London: Westview Press.
- Hosgor, E. (2013). Islamic capital/Anatolian tigers: past and present. Middle Eastern Studies, 47(2), 343-360.
- Isık, O. & Pınarcıoğlu, M. (2006). Geographies of a silent transition: a geographically weighted regression approach to regional fertility differences in Turkey. European Journal of Population, 22(4), 399-421.
- Karadağ, M., Ozlem O. & Delktas, E. (2005). Growth of factor productivity in the Turkish manufacturing industry at provincial level. Regional Studies, 39(2), 213-223.
- Kenish, O. (1995). The end of the nation state: the rise of regional economies. New York: The Free Press.
- Keyman, E. F. & Koyuncu, B. (2005). Globalization, alternative modernities and the political economy of Turkey. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 105-128.
- Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Mardin, Ş. (1973). Center-periphery relations: A key to Turkish politics? Daedalus, 169-190.
- Nemeth, R. J. & Smith, D. A. (1985). International trade and world-system structure: a multiple network analysis. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 8(4), Page 517-560.
- Öncü, A. & Köse, A. (1998). Dünya ve Turkiye ekonomisinde Anadolu imalat sanayii: zenginlesmenin mi yoksa yoksullasmanin mi eşiğindeyiz?. Toplum ve Bilim, 77, Page 151-152.
- Piore M.J. & Sabel,C. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity.
- Sabel, C. (1984). Work and Politics: The Division of Labor in Industry, Cambridge University Press.
- Satoğlu, E.B. (2008). Anatolian tigers: Local adaptability to global competitiveness in Kayseri. Boğaziçi University: İstanbul Turkey.
- Schmitz, H. (2004). Local enterprises in the global economy: Issues of Governance and Upgrading. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Sugur, N. (1997). Small firm flexibility in Turkey: the case of OSTIM industrial district at Ankara. New Perspectives on Turkey, 16, Page 87-104.
- Tok, E. (2011). Varieties of communitarianism in the cities of Anatolia region: a comparison of Kayseri, Gaziantep and Eskisehir. Carleton University: Ottawa, Canada.
- Toprak, M., Demir, Ö. & Acar, M. (2004). Anatolian tigers or Islamic capital: prospects and challenges. Middle Eastern Studies, 40(6), 166-188.
- Yavuz, H. (2003). Islamic Political Identity in Turkey. Oxford University Press on Demand https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/anatolian-tigers.asp#ixzz51KYyRPa1 (Reached: 10.12.2017 )
Abstract
References
- Adas, E. B. (2006). The making of entrepreneurial Islam and the Islamic spirit of capitalism. Journal for Cultural Research, 10(2), 113-137.
- Bayırbağ, M. K. (2010). Local entrepreneurialism and state rescaling in Turkey. Urban Studies, 47(2), 363-385.
- Çokgezen, M. (2000). New fragmentations and new cooperations in the Turkish bourgeoisie. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(5), 525-544.
- Demirdag, I. (2015). Entrepreneurship and regional economic sevelopment: evidence on Turkish regions. METU: Ankara, Turkey.
- Duruiz, L., & Yentürk, N. (1993). Facing the challenge: Turkish automobile, steel and clothing industries' responses to post‐fordist restructuring. Development Policy Review, 11(3), 289-304.
- Eraydın, A. (2001). The roles of central government policies and the new forms of local governance in the emergence of industrial districts. Promoting Local Growth: Process, Practice and Policy, 81-101.
- Eraydın, A. (2002). Yeni sanayi odakları: Yerel kalkınmanın yeniden kavramlaştırılması. ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi.
- Eraydin, A. & Armatli-Köroğlu, B. (2005). Innovation, networking and the new industrial clusters: the characteristics of networks and local innovation capabilities in the Turkish industrial clusters. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 17(4), 237-266.
- Hoffman, O. and Kaplinsky, C. (1988). Driving force: the global restructuring of technology, labour and investment in the automobile and components industries. London: Westview Press.
- Hosgor, E. (2013). Islamic capital/Anatolian tigers: past and present. Middle Eastern Studies, 47(2), 343-360.
- Isık, O. & Pınarcıoğlu, M. (2006). Geographies of a silent transition: a geographically weighted regression approach to regional fertility differences in Turkey. European Journal of Population, 22(4), 399-421.
- Karadağ, M., Ozlem O. & Delktas, E. (2005). Growth of factor productivity in the Turkish manufacturing industry at provincial level. Regional Studies, 39(2), 213-223.
- Kenish, O. (1995). The end of the nation state: the rise of regional economies. New York: The Free Press.
- Keyman, E. F. & Koyuncu, B. (2005). Globalization, alternative modernities and the political economy of Turkey. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 105-128.
- Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Mardin, Ş. (1973). Center-periphery relations: A key to Turkish politics? Daedalus, 169-190.
- Nemeth, R. J. & Smith, D. A. (1985). International trade and world-system structure: a multiple network analysis. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 8(4), Page 517-560.
- Öncü, A. & Köse, A. (1998). Dünya ve Turkiye ekonomisinde Anadolu imalat sanayii: zenginlesmenin mi yoksa yoksullasmanin mi eşiğindeyiz?. Toplum ve Bilim, 77, Page 151-152.
- Piore M.J. & Sabel,C. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity.
- Sabel, C. (1984). Work and Politics: The Division of Labor in Industry, Cambridge University Press.
- Satoğlu, E.B. (2008). Anatolian tigers: Local adaptability to global competitiveness in Kayseri. Boğaziçi University: İstanbul Turkey.
- Schmitz, H. (2004). Local enterprises in the global economy: Issues of Governance and Upgrading. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Sugur, N. (1997). Small firm flexibility in Turkey: the case of OSTIM industrial district at Ankara. New Perspectives on Turkey, 16, Page 87-104.
- Tok, E. (2011). Varieties of communitarianism in the cities of Anatolia region: a comparison of Kayseri, Gaziantep and Eskisehir. Carleton University: Ottawa, Canada.
- Toprak, M., Demir, Ö. & Acar, M. (2004). Anatolian tigers or Islamic capital: prospects and challenges. Middle Eastern Studies, 40(6), 166-188.
- Yavuz, H. (2003). Islamic Political Identity in Turkey. Oxford University Press on Demand https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/anatolian-tigers.asp#ixzz51KYyRPa1 (Reached: 10.12.2017 )
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | July 15, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Volume: 5 Issue: 2 |
Journal of Management,
Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed,
quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing
months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages
of the Journal are English and Turkish. JMML aims to provide a research source
for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in
the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management,
international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that
cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest
areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.