ANALYSIS OF AIRPORT GROUND ACCESS SERVICES BY SP/RP MODEL WITHIN THE SCOPE OF HASAN POLATKAN AIRPORT MASTER PLAN

Year 2020, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 143 - 153, 30.09.2020

Savas S Ates

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1286

Abstract

Purpose - The airport master plan should include requirements and recommendations, demand forecasts, environmental analysis, layout plan, facility requirements, financial size, and location selection information. The biggest factor in choosing air transportation by passengers is that it is a fast and comfortable mode of transportation. Since the transportation time and ease of the airport is also a factor affecting this factor, its integration with airport access roads, intercity connecting roads and other modes of transportation is important for the passengers to choose air transportation. Therefore, the importance of airport access roads in master plan studies can be understood more clearly. Aim of the study is that analyzing to airport ground access services of Hasan Polatkan Airport within the scope of master plan.
Methodology - In the first part of the research, the airport planning steps are examined in the literature. Airport ground access services data was collected with the secondary data. Revealed preferences surveys (RP) and stated preferences surveys (SP) were used to get he data of the passengers’ satisfaction. A statistical program used to analysis of survey. Total of 91 passengers were reached in 3 different flights in 2018 in the summer. The scale of the research was adapted from the Passenger Time Value, Benefit-Cost Analysis and Airport Capital Investment Decisions book
Findings- Only 15.4 percent of the passengers use public transportation to access the airport. Conducted with the passengers at the Eskişehir Hasan Polatkan Airport Terminal Section, the passengers were generally satisfied with the transportation conditions to the airport. The primary mode of transportation preferred for RP in access to the airport is light rail systems.
Conclusion- Survey form to evaluate the airport transportation services in terms of passengers was prepared and applied on outgoing incoming passengers. As a consequence of the analysis of the research, suggestions about Hasan Polatkan airport were completed.

Keywords

Airport planning, airport services, Hasan Polatkan Airport, SP/RP model

References

• Akar, G. (2013). Ground access to airports, case study: Port Columbus International. Journal of Air Transport Management, 30, 25-31. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.04.002
• Alhussein, S. N. (2011). Analysis of ground access modes choice King Khaled International Airport, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 1361–1367. doi:doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.07.007
• Ashford, N., and Wright, P. H. (1992). Airport Engineering. New York: A Wiley-Interscience Publication.
• Ateş, S. S. (2006). Havaalanı Master Planlama Yaklaşımları. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Havacılık Yönetimi ABD. Yayınlanmamış Yükseklisans Tezi.
• Budd, T., Ryley, T., and Ison, S. (2014). Airport ground access and private car use: a segmentation analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 106–115.
• Caves, R. E., and Gosling, G. D. (1999). Strategic Airport Planning. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
• Chang, Y.-C. (2013). Factors affecting airport access mode choice for elderly air passengers. Transportation Research Part E(57), 105–112. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.010
• Cirillo, C., and Xu, R. (2010). Forecasting Cybercar Use for Airport Ground Access: Case Study at Baltimore Washington International Airport. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 136(3), 186-194.
• Coogan, M. A. (2008). Ground Access to Major Airports by Public Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• Cunningham, L. F., and Gerlach, J. H. (1998). Transportation agencies’ experiences with decision support systems for airport ground access planning. Transportation, 25(1), 37-53.
• EBB. (2019, Aralık 20). Eskişehir Büyük Şehir Belediyesi. Otobüs Güzergahı Sorgula: http://www.eskisehir.bel.tr/otobus_saatleri_guzergah_get.php adresinden alındı
• Gokasar, İ., and Gunay, G. (2016). Mode choice behavior modeling of ground access to airports: A case modeling of ground access to airports: A case. Journal of Air Transport Management(59), 1-7. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.11.003
• Gosling, G. D. (2008). Airport Ground Access Mode Choice Models. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• Greenberger, M. A. (2010). Marketing Guidebook for Small Airports. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.17226/14353.
• Jou, R.-C., Hensher, D. A., and Hsu, T.-L. (2011). Airport ground access mode choice behavior after the introduction of a new mode: A case study of Taoyuan International Airport in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E, 371–381. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2010.11.008
• Kwakkel, J., Kwakkel, J., and Marchau, V. (2010). Adaptive Airport Strategic Planning. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research (EJTIR), 10(3), 249-273. doi:https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2010.10.3.2891
• Landau, S. (2015). Passenger Value of Time, Benefit-Cost Analysis and Airport Capital Investment Decisions, Volume 1: Guidebook for Valuing User Time Savings in Airport Capital Investment Decision Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.17226/22162.
• Landau, S., Weisbrod, G., Gosling, G., and Williges, C. (2015). Passenger Value of Time, Benefit-Cost Analysis and Airport Capital Investment Decisions, Volume 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.17226/22161
• Llorca, C., Zhang, Q., Moreno, A., and Moeckel, R. (2019). Airport access and egress trips in an agent-based travel demand model. 8th Symposium of the European Association for Research in Transportation. Budapest: hEART 2019.
• Mantecchini, L., and Paganelli, F. (2016). Airport ground access and urban congestion: a paradox of bi-modal networks. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 30(9), 1491-1501. doi:https://doi.org/10.12988/ces.2016.68147
• National Research Council. (1996). Airline Passenger Security Screening: New Technologies and Implementation Issues. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.17226/5116.
• Nixon, C. (2014). The dynamic planning approach and the death of the traditional master plan. Journal of Airport Management, 8(4), 343-350.
• Oktal, H., and Ateş, S. S. (2010). Havaalanları Master Planlama Yaklaşımları ve Türkiye İçin Bir Öneri. UHUK’10 Eskişehir. Eskişehir: UHUK.
• Olio, L. D., Ibeas, A., Ona, J. d., and Ona, R. d. (2017). Public Transportation Quality of Service: Factors, Models, and Applications. Elsevier.
• Pasha, M. M., and Hickman, M. (2017). Airport Employees Ground Accessibility: Review and Assessment. In Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF). Auckland,: ATRF 2017 Proceedings.
• Pucci, P., and Lanza, G. (2019). High speed rail and airport. Future scenarios in Marco Polo Airport in Venice. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 12(3), 265-282. doi:https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/6072
• Salamone, M. R. (2009). Strategic Planning in the Airport Industry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.17226/14339
• Saldıraner, Y. (2013). Airport master planning in Turkey; planning and development problems and proposals. Journal of Air Transport Management(32), 71-77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.07.003
• Tam, M. L., Lam, W. H., and Lo, H. P. (2008). Modeling Air Passenger Travel Behavior on Airport Ground Access Mode Choices. Transportmetrica, 4(2), 135-153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/18128600808685685
• Tam, M.-L., and Lo, W. H.-P. (2011). The Impact of Travel Time Reliability and Perceived Service Quality on Airport Ground Access Mode Choice. Journal of Choice Modelling, 4(2), 49-69.
• Tsamboulas, D. A., and Nikoleris, A. (2008). Passengers’ willingness to pay for airport ground access time savings. Transportation Research Part A, 1274–1282. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.013