Amaç - Bu çalışmanın amacı, algılanan risk ve e- güvensizliğin, webrooming niyeti ve webrooming davranışı üzerindeki etkilerini gerekçeli eylem teorisi çerçevesinde incelemektir.
Yöntem- 15 Ocak-15 Şubat 2021 tarihleri arasında çevrimiçi anketler vasıtasıyla kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile 211 katılımcıdan veri toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler en küçük kısmi kareler yöntemi ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir.
Bulgular- Araştırmanın bulgularına göre, çevrimiçi alışverişin algılanan riski ve çevrimiçi bilgi aramanın algılanan riskinin e- güvensizlik üzerinde etkili olduğu; e-güvensizliğin ise webrooming niyeti üzerinde etkili olduğu ve webrooming niyetinin de webrooming davranışı üzerinde etkili olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
Sonuç- Tüketicilerin teslimat, finansal ve psikolojik olarak algıladıkları riskler ile ürünün kalitesini anlayamamaktan kaynaklanan algıladıkları riskler webrooming davranışında bulunmalarını sağlamaktadır.
Webrooming davranışı webrooming niyeti Gerekçeli Eylem Teorisi algılanan risk e-güvensizlik
Purpose- The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of perceived risk and e-distrust on webrooming intention and webrooming behavior in the framework of the Theory of Reasoned Action.
Methodology- Data were collected from 211 participants by using the convenience sampling method via online surveys between January 15 - February 15, 2021. The data obtained were analyzed by using structural equation modeling with the partial least squares method.
Findings- According to the findings, the perceived risk of online shopping and the perceived risk of online search has effect on e-distrust and e-distrust has an effect on the webrooming intention and the webrooming intention has an effect on the webrooming behavior.
Conclusion- The risks that consumers perceive in terms of delivery, financial and psychological and the perceived risks arising from not understanding the quality of the product enable them to act in webrooming behavior.
Webrooming behavior webrooming intention Theory of Reasoned Action perceived risk e-distrust
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Subjects | Business Administration |
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | March 30, 2021 |
Published in Issue | Year 2021 Volume: 8 Issue: 1 |
Journal of Management,
Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed,
quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing
months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages
of the Journal are English and Turkish. JMML aims to provide a research source
for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in
the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management,
international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that
cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest
areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.