Purpose- The aim of this study is to examine the consumer approach towards the use of organic ingredients in the production of organic products according to sociodemographic variables.
Methodology- The sample group of the study, in which quantitative research method was used, consists of 608 female consumers in Malatya. To reach the data of the research, a questionnaire form and a personal information form were used to measure the consumer approach to the use of organic ingredients in the production of organic products. Questionnaire forms were completed face-to-face in the city center between November 1 and December 30, 2019. The obtained data were analyzed with inferential and descriptive analysis.
Findings- One of the reasons why the demand for organic products is not as high as it should be is because consumers are sceptical of organic products' reliability, as well as the ingredients used. Consumers have a favourable attitude toward organic items. However, in this study, despite the positive evaluations for organic products, it was seen that there were question marks about the ingredients used and there was a dilemma. The participants were found to be unable to fully trust the definition of "organic product" or to be certain that organic products were free of synthetic raw materials, paraben, SLS, and other non-organic ingredients.
Conclusion- In Turkey and around the world, consumers' opinions regarding organic food products and their purchase behaviours, mostly on organic agricultural products, were investigated. What makes products organic are the ingredients used and the production methods. However, it is mentioned to directly explain what consumers think about organic ingredients with this study. The approaches of consumers regarding the ingredients of organic products within the framework of their socio-demographic characteristics is examined. In this context it has been discovered that consumer views on the use of organic ingredients in organic products vary depending on socio-demographic factors.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Business Administration |
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 30, 2021 |
Published in Issue | Year 2021 Volume: 8 Issue: 2 |
Journal of Management,
Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed,
quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing
months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages
of the Journal are English and Turkish. JMML aims to provide a research source
for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in
the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management,
international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that
cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest
areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.