Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

HOW LEADERSHIP STYLE MATTERS FOR INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 136 - 146, 31.12.2022

Abstract

Purpose- It is a clear fact that innovation and the ability to innovate is essential for organizations. Especially, actions of individuals are essential for continuous innovation and improvement. That’s why innovative behaviors of the individuals at a workplace have the utmost importance to achieve innovation regarding organizational level. Hence, to uncover the relationship between leadership styles and innovative work behaviors of the employees is the purpose of this study.
Methodology- In this study, the data has been collected through a questionnaire survey within the sample of white-collar employees of one of the special banks which operates in Turkey by using convenience sampling method. As a means of measurement, Leadership Style (MLQ) Scale by Bass and Avolio (2000) and Turkish Translation by Yurtkoru (2001) and Innovative Work Behavior Scale by de Jong and den Hartog (2010) and Turkish translation by Çimen and Yücel (2017) have been applied. Exploratory factor analysis, correlation and multiple regression analysis have been conducted. The main question to which this research tries to find answer is whether leadership styles have any significant effect on employees’ innovative work behavior or not.
Findings- Research results revealed that the leadership behaviors of the leader affect the employees’ innovation tendency or in other words, their innovative work behaviors.
Conclusion- Both transformational leadership and transactional leadership types have a significant effect on innovative work behavior of the employees. On the other hand, laissez-faire leadership type has no effect on innovative work behavior of the employees. In addition, this study provides conclusive evidence for further research that organizational culture, psychological factors and innovation climate in the organization can be put into the model as well to see the mediating or direct effect of leadership styles on employees’ innovative work behavior.

References

  • Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441–462.
  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Collier: Macmillan.
  • Bass, B., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 9, 181-217.
  • Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31.
  • Bolat, T., & Seymen, O. A. (2003). Örgütlerde iş etiğinin yerleştirilmesinde dönüşümcü liderlik tarzınin etkileri üzerine bir değerlendirme. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(9), 59-85.
  • Buluç, B. (2009). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin algılarına göre okul müdürlerinin liderlik stilleri ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 57 (57), 5-34.
  • Cemaloğlu, N. (2009). Okul yöneticilerinin liderlik stillerinin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 73-114.
  • Church, A. H., Waclawski, J., & Burke, W. W. (1996). OD practitioners as facilitators of change. Group & Organization Management, 21(1), 22–66.
  • Crawford, C. B. (2001). Leadership and innovation: Champions and techies as agents of influence. In A Paper Presented to the Association of Leadership Educators 2001 Conference Review Committee, 1-18.
  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.
  • Damanpour, F., Szabat, K. A., & Evan, W. M. (1989). The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 26(6), 587–602.
  • De Jong, J.P. and Den Hartog, D.N. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64.
  • De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36.
  • Erkuş, A. & Günlü, E. (2008). Duygusal zekanın dönüşümcü liderlik üzerine etkileri. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 9 (2), 187-209.
  • Ersoydan, Y., & Karakelle, S. (2014). Türkiye’deki koro şeflerinin dönüşümcü ve etkileşimci liderlik davranışlarının incelenmesi. Art-e Sanat Dergisi, 7(13), 31-52.
  • Farr, J. L., & Ford, C. M. (1990). Individual Innovation. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and Creativity at Work. New York: Wiley.
  • Hartog, D. N., Muijen, J. J., & Koopman, P. L. (1997). Transactional versus transformational leadership: an analysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(1), 19–34.
  • Hinkin, T., & Tracey, J. (1999). The relevance of charisma for transformational leadership in stable organizations. The Journal of Change Management, 105-119.
  • Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 891–902.
  • Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: a critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 549–569.
  • Imran, R., & Anis-ul-Haque, M. (2011). Mediating effect of organizational climate between transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 183-199.
  • Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness, and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302.
  • Janssen, O. (2002). Transformational leiderschap en innovatief werkgedrag van medewerkers: een kwestie van benaderbaarheid van de leider. Gedrag and Organisatie, 15, 275-293.
  • Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4–5), 525–544.
  • Karip, Y. D. D. E. (1998). Dönüşümcü liderlik . Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 16 (16), 443-465.
  • Khan, M. J., Aslam, N., & Riaz, M. N. (2012). Leadership styles as predictors of innovative work behavior. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 17-22.
  • Kenny, B & Reedy, E (2006). The impact of organizational culture factors on innovation levels in SME’s: an empirical investigation. The Irish Journal of Management, 5, 199-142.
  • Lee, A., Legood, A., Hughes, D., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Knight, C. (2019). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: a meta-analytic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1–35.
  • Leskovar-Spacapan, G. & Bastic, M. (2007) Differences in organizations innovation capability in transition economy: internal aspect of the organization’s strategic orientation. Technovation, 27, 533-546.
  • Li, H., Sajjad, N., Wang, Q., Muhammad Ali, A., Khaqan, Z., & Amina, S. (2019). Influence of transformational leadership on employees’ innovative work behavior in sustainable organizations: test of mediation and moderation processes. Sustainability, 11(6), 1594.
  • Mcdonald, R. E., (2002). Knowledge Entrepreneurship: Linking Organizational Learning and Innovation, A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Phisology at the University Connecticut, 1-182.
  • Patterson, F., Kerrin, M., Gatto-Roissard, G., & Coan, P. (2009). Everyday innovation: How to enhance innovative working in employees and organisations. Nesta.
  • Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42, 53–79
  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
  • Sharifirad, M. S. (2013). Transformational leadership, innovative work behavior, and employee well-being. Global Business Perspect, 1, 198-225.
  • Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11-27.
  • Stoffers, J., Neessen, P., & van Dorp, P. (2015). Organizational culture and innovative work behavior: A case study of a manufacturer of packaging machines. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 5(4), 198–207
  • Tepper, B. J., & Percy, P. M. (1994). Structural validity of the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 734–744.
  • Tichy, N. M., & Devanna, M. A. (1986). The transformational leader. Training & Development Journal, 40(7), 27–32.
  • Torres, F. C., Espinosa, J. C., Dornberger, U., & Acosta, Y. A. C. (2017). Leadership and employees’ innovative work behavior: test of a mediation and moderation model. Asian Social Science, 13(9):9-25.
  • Tracey, J.B & Hinkin, T. R (1998). Transformational Leadership or Effective Managerial Practices? Group & Organization Management, 23(2), 220-236.
  • Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Human Relations, 43(10), 975–995.
  • Yammarıno, f. J., & Dubınsky, a. J. (1994). Transformational leadership theory: using levels of analysis to determine boundary conditions. Personnel Psychology, 47(4), 787–811.
  • Yurtkoru, E. S. (2001). The role of leadership in the organizational change process, Doctoral dissertation, Marmara Universitesi, Turkey
There are 44 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

F. Gulruh Gurbuz This is me 0000-0002-0719-3410

Burcu Gulec This is me 0000-0002-4243-2827

Publication Date December 31, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 9 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Gurbuz, F. G., & Gulec, B. (2022). HOW LEADERSHIP STYLE MATTERS FOR INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 9(4), 136-146.

Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JMML aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management, international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.


Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.