Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

PERCEIVED SUPPORT AND ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTIONS AMONG OMANI UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 156 - 164, 31.12.2022

Abstract

Purpose – The study's goal is to determine whether there is a relationship between family income, the father's occupation, education, and study plan, and Omani students' perceived support for entrepreneurship. Furthermore, the research will look into the relationship between Omani underground students' perceived support and their entrepreneurial intentions.
Methodology – The study employed deductive research methodology and a quantitative research approach since it was empirical research that employed analytical techniques to provide quantifiable data. The descriptive research design was also employed because it summarises the characteristics of the population or problem under consideration. Furthermore, the purposive sampling strategy, a non-probability sampling technique, was used as the study's sampling strategy. In total, 478 undergraduate Omani students were chosen as respondents, and the data was analysed using descriptive and regression techniques using the latest version of the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software, 21.0.
Findings – The findings indicate that students have a favourable perception of support for entrepreneurship. The highest mean scores recorded for the place where students live indicate sufficient awareness of entrepreneurship (4.51) and that college experience and knowledge have inspired them to become entrepreneurs (4.35), with a verbal interpretation of "strongly agree" for both factors. Besides family income, the father's occupation, education, and study plan had no discernible influence on Omani students' intentions to start their own businesses. It denotes that the hypothesis factors have no bearing on entrepreneurial inclinations. Furthermore, Pearson's correlation of 0.720 and p-value of 0.000 < 0.05 indicated that entrepreneurial intention is highly and significantly correlated with perceived entrepreneurship support.
Conclusion - The results of the study show that Oman's underground students have a moderately high perceived level of support for entrepreneurship. Besides, students believe they have support from the government, their families, and friends to achieve their business ambitions after graduation. A link between students' perceived entrepreneurial support and their entrepreneurial goals was also discovered by the study.

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Autio, E. & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43 (3), 476–449.
  • Al-Harrasi, A. S., Al-Zadjali, E. B., & Al-Salti, Z. S. (2014). Factors impacting entrepreneurial intention: a literature review. Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering, 8 (8), 2354-2456.
  • Al-Harrasi, S., & Al-Salti, S. (2014). Entrepreneurial intention among information systems (IS) students at sultan Qaboos university: an exploratory study. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: An Administration and Management, 14 (9), 31–34.
  • Alexandre, L., & Kharabsheh, R. (2019). The evolution of female entrepreneurship in the Gulf Cooperation Council, the case of Bahrain. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 11 (4), 390-407. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-02-2019-0041.
  • Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research, 12th ed., Wadsworth, Belmont.
  • Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1 (2), 164–180.
  • Baughn, C. C. (2006). Normative, social, and cognitive predictors of entrepreneurial interest in China, Vietnam, and the Philippines. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11 (1), 57-77.
  • Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 3rd ed. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
  • Creswell, J.W., (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks.
  • Denanyoh, R., Adjei, K. & Nyamekye, G. E. (2015) Factors that impact entrepreneurial intention of Tertiary Students in Ghana. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 5 (3), 19-29.
  • Dickson, P., Solomon, G., & Weaver, K. (2008). Entrepreneurial selection and success: do education matter? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15 (2), 239-258.
  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (1), 1-37.
  • Engle, R. L., Schlaegel, C., & Dimitriadi, N. (2011). Institutions and entrepreneurial intent: a cross-country study. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 16 (2), 227-250.
  • European Commission. (2013). Focus on young people and entrepreneurship. Youth in action Programme. European good practice projects, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Fayolle, A., & Gailly. B. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53 (1), 75-93.
  • Gelard, P., & Saleh, E. K. (2011). Impact of some contextual factors on entrepreneurial intention of university students. African Journal of Business Management, 5 (26), 10707-10717.
  • Guerrero, M., Liñán, F. & Cáceres-Carrasco, F.R. (2021). The influence of ecosystems on the entrepreneurship process: a comparison across developed and developing economies. Small Business Economics 57, 1733–1759.
  • Hsu, D. K., Katrin, B. L., Simmons, S. A., Maw-Der, F., Hong, M. C., & Pipes, J. D. (2018). I know I can, but I don't fit': perceived fit, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Business Venturing, 34 (2), 311–326.
  • Ibrahim, O. A., Devesh, S., & Ubaidullah, V. (2017). Implication of attitude of graduate students in Oman towards entrepreneurship: an empirical study. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 7 (1), 1-17.
  • Kothari, C.R. (2010). Research Methodology: Methods and Technique. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers, p. 31.
  • Kraaijenbrink, J., Bos, G., & Groen, A. (2010). What do students think of the entrepreneurial support given by their universities? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 9 (1), 110–125.
  • Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40 (2), 211-225.
  • Muscat Daily. (2015). Unemployment rate in Sultanate of Oman. http://www.muscatdaily.com/Archive/Oman/ Unemploymentrate -in-the-sultanate. [Date Accessed: September 10, 2022]
  • Mustapha, M., & Selvaraju, M. (2015). Personal attributes, family influences, entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurship inclination among university students. Economics and Management Journal, 33 (1), 155-172.
  • Nabila, S., Ambad, A., Haryani, D., & Ag, D. (2016). Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intention among Undergraduate Students in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37 (16), 108-114.
  • Nanda, R. & Sorensen, J. B. (2006). Peer effects and entrepreneurship. http://www.doku.iab.de/veranstaltungen/2006 /CAFE_2006_A3_Soerensen.pdf/. [Date Accessed: October 11, 2022]
  • NCSI. (2015). National Centre for Statistics and Information; Statistical yearbook. Issue 43–2015. Oman: National Centre for Statistics and Information.
  • NCSI. (2020). National Centre for Statistics and Information; Statistical yearbook. Issue 48–2020. Oman: National Centre for Statistics and Information.
  • Negash, E. & Amentie, C. (2013). An investigation of higher education student’s entrepreneurial intention in Ethiopian Universities: Technology and business field in focus. Journal of Business Management and Accounts, 2 (2), 30-35.
  • Postigo, C. (2006). Entrepreneurial intention among Indonesian and Norwegian students. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 12 (1), 55-78.
  • Rowley, J. (2014). Designing and Using Research Questionnaires. Management Research Review, 37, 308-330.
  • Saeed, S., Yousafzai, S. Y., Yani-De-Soriano, M., & Muffatto, M. (2015). The role of perceived university support in the formation of students’ entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Small Business Management, 53 (4), 1127–1145.
  • Sharma, B.A.V., Prasad, D. R. & Satyanarayana. P. (1983). Research Methods in Social Sciences, New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
  • Tahir, M., Iqbal, K., Siddiq, A., & Jan, M. F. (2018). Promotion of entrepreneurship intention among female students in Pakistan by utilizing the perceived support model and the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Management Research, 4 (1), 1-14.
  • Trivedi, R. (2016). Does university play significant role in shaping entrepreneurial intention? A cross-country comparative analysis. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23 (3), 790–811.
  • Turker, D., & Selcuk, S. S. (2009). Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students? Journal of European Industrial Training, 33 (2), 142–159.
  • Venesaar, U. Kolbre, E., & Piliste T. (2006). Students’ attitudes and intentions toward entrepreneurship at Tallinn University of Technology, (154), 97–114.
  • Van Stel, A., Storey, D. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28 (2-3), 171-186.
  • Wegner, D., Thomas, E., Teixeira, E. K., & Maehler, A. E. (2019). University entrepreneurial push strategy and students’ entrepreneurial intention. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 26 (2), 307–325.
  • Zhang, Y., Duysters, G., & Cloodt, M. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10 (3), 623–641
There are 40 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Raja Tumatı This is me 0000-0002-2194-2924

Nvr Jyoti Kumar This is me 0000-0003-1802-5655

Publication Date December 31, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 9 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Tumatı, R., & Kumar, N. J. (2022). PERCEIVED SUPPORT AND ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTIONS AMONG OMANI UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 9(4), 156-164.

Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JMML aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management, international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.


Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.