Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

WORKFORCE AGILITY: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND COMPARISON WITH DOMESTIC STUDIES

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 101 - 121, 31.12.2024

Abstract

Purpose- This research has three main scopes and objectives. The first objective is to thoroughly examine the concept of workforce agility, delineate its boundaries, and conduct a systematic literature review. This review will report existing studies based on their objectives, methods, conceptual frameworks, and findings to identify prevailing patterns. The second objective of the research is to review the local literature, identify and analyze articles, and graduate theses focused on workforce agility within Turkey. The final objective is to review the studies from both local and international literature in a comparative manner to identify and discuss research gaps in the local literature.
Methodology- A comprehensive systematic literature review is conducted within the Scopus database. This review identified 36 eligible articles focused on workforce agility, which were reviewed and reported for their objectives, methodologies, and findings. Additionally, theses focused on workforce agility listed in the Council of Higher Education Thesis Center and articles by local authors listed on Google Scholar have been reviewed and discussed for their goals, methodologies, samples, and conclusions in order to enable a comparative view.
Findings- International studies emphasize various dimensions of workforce agility, notably proactivity, adaptability, and resilience. These studies highlight the influence of emotional intelligence, organizational structure, and digital transformation on agility. Conversely, Turkish literature remains limited in scope, mainly focusing on specific sectors like ICT and hospitality. Since the number of studies is still very low, critical gaps are identified, such as longitudinal studies and investigations into cross-cultural and cross-sectoral studies such as healthcare and education, indicating a need for broader research within Turkey.
Conclusion- The study concludes that while workforce agility is increasingly acknowledged as a vital competency, Turkish literature is still developing compared to global studies. Addressing gaps, such as cross-sector analysis and the influence of cultural factors, could enrich the understanding of workforce agility in Turkey. Recommendations for future research include expanding sector-specific studies and exploring workforce agility's impact on organizational capabilities and performance types in diverse Turkish industries.

References

  • Abrishamkar, M. M., Abubakar, Y. A., & Mitra, J. (2021). The influence of workforce agility on high-growth firms: The mediating role of innovation. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 22(3), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750320973896
  • Ajgaonkar, S., Neelam, N. G., & Wiemann, J. (2022). Drivers of workforce agility: a dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(4), 951–982. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-11-2020-2507
  • Aktaş, İ. (2019). Mahalli idarelerde politik beceriler, iş gücü atikliği ve liderlik stili arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi (Master’s thesis). İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Aktaş, B. N., & Ülgen, B. (2021). Yenilikçi insan kaynakları yönetim uygulamalarının örgütsel çeviklik üzerindeki etkisi: Savunma sanayi işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Anadolu İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 5(1), 49-73.
  • AlAbood, A., & Manakkattil MohammedIsmail, S. (2023). Workforce agility, organizational identity and solidarity as antecedents of innovative work behaviour – an examination using structural equation modelling. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-07-2022-0458
  • Alavi, S. (2016). The influence of workforce agility on external manufacturing flexibility of Iranian SMEs. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 8(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtlid.2016.075185
  • Alavi, S., Abd. Wahab, D., Muhamad, N., & Arbab Shirani, B. (2014). Organic structure and organisational learning as the main antecedents of workforce agility. International Journal of Production Research, 52(21), 6273–6295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.919420
  • Al-Faouri, A. H., Al-Nsour, M. M., & Al-Kasasbeh, M. M. (2014). The impact of workforce agility on organizational memory. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12(4), 432–442. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.19
  • Almahmeed, G., & Salih, A. A. (2021). Validity of the workforce agility (WFA) attributes for measuring the performance development “Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis”. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 1-10.
  • Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2013/37:2.3
  • Boehm, B., & Turner, R. N. (2003). Balancing agility and discipline: A guide for the perplexed. Addison-Wesley Professional.
  • Brandes, P. M. (1997). Organizational cynicism: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Cincinnati, Ohio, US.
  • Braunscheidel, M. J., & Suresh, N. C. (2008). The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.006
  • Bundtzen, H., & Hinrichs, G. (2021). The Link Between Organizational Agility And VUCA – An Agile Assessment Model. SocioEconomic Challenges, 5(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.5(1).35-43.2021
  • Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2019). Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change. Kogan Page Publishers.
  • Cao, M., Zhang, Q., & Seydel, J. (2005). B2C e‐commerce web site quality: an empirical examination. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(5), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570510600000
  • Chong, Y. K., & Zainal, S. R. M. (2024). Employee agility’s mediating role on the link between employee vitality, digital literacy and transformational leadership with job performance: an empirical study. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2337447. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2337447
  • Çömlekçi, M. G., & Bozkurt, S. (2024). DİJİTAL LİDERLİK VE BİREYSEL YENİLİKÇİLİK İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞGÜCÜ ÇEVİKLİĞİNİN ROLÜ. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 11(24), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1384580
  • Das, K. P., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Suar, D. (2023). Enablers of workforce agility, firm performance, and corporate reputation. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.01.006
  • Demir, S., & Yaşar, F. (2018). Ödül Yönetiminin İşgücü Atikliği Üzerine Etkisi: Kahramanmaraş İli Tekstil Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(3), 691-705.
  • Demirler, S. (2023). Dijital örgüt kültürü bağlamında işgücü çevikliği, yabancılaşma ve psikolojik güçlendirme ilişkisi (Doctoral dissertation). Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Manisa.
  • Demirler, S., & Oral Ataç, L. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature on Workforce Agility. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 13(30), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.1143315
  • DeRue, D. S., Ashford, S. J., & Myers, C. G. (2012). Learning Agility: In Search of Conceptual Clarity and Theoretical Grounding. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01444.x
  • Dirani, K. M., Abadi, M., Alizadeh, A., Barhate, B., Garza, R. C., Gunasekara, N., Ibrahim, G., & Majzun, Z. (2020). Leadership competencies and the essential role of human resource development in times of crisis: a response to Covid-19 pandemic. Human Resource Development International, 23(4), 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1780078
  • Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 370-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.006
  • Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2008). The Dynamics of Strategic Agility: Nokia’s Rollercoaster Experience. California Management Review, 50(3), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166447
  • Düger, Y. S. (2023). İşgücü çevikliğinin öncülleri ve etkilerini belirlemeye yönelik sistematik bir analiz. In G. Örmeci Güney (Ed.), Ekonomi, sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve işletme alanında akademik çalışmalar (pp. 19-34). Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Dyer, L., & Ericksen, J. (2006). Dynamic organizations: Achieving marketplace agility through workforce scalability. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(4), 53-73.
  • Felipe, C., Roldán, J., & Leal-Rodríguez, A. (2017). Impact of Organizational Culture Values on Organizational Agility. Sustainability, 9(12), 2354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122354
  • Franco, C., & Landini, F. (2022). Organizational drivers of innovation: The role of workforce agility. Research Policy, 51(2), 104423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104423
  • Gerçek, M. (2023). What is the Meaning of “Agile” for Human Resource Management? A Systematic Review on HRM and Agility. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(2), 708–739. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1260274
  • Gligor, D. M., Holcomb, M. C., & Stank, T. P. (2013). A Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Agility: Conceptualization and Scale Development. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12012
  • Goldman, S. L., Nagel, R. N., & Preiss, K. (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations: strategies for enriching the customer (Vol. 8). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Good, D., & Yeganeh, B. (2012). Cognitive agility: adapting to real-time decision making at work. OD Practitioner, 44(2), 13-17.
  • Gunasekaran, A. (1998). Agile manufacturing: Enablers and an implementation framework. International Journal of Production Research, 36(5), 1223–1247. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075498193291
  • Hacıoğlu, B. N. (2024). İnsan kaynakları yönetimine yönelik yapay zeka algısının çalışanların çeviklik performansı ve işe bağlanması üzerindeki etkisi (Master’s thesis). Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Gebze.
  • Hanu, C., Amegbe, H., Yawson, M. D. T. A., & Mensah, P. (2023). Differential impact of work-based learning on employee agility, ambidexterity and proactive goal generation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 35(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-01-2022-0005
  • Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healey, M. P. (2011). Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1500–1516. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.964
  • Iravani, S. M. R., & Krishnamurthy, V. (2007). Workforce Agility in Repair and Maintenance Environments. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9(2), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1060.0132
  • Janani, M., & Vijayalakshmi, V. (2023). An arts-based process to build Workforce agility. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(6), 917–931. https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-03-2023-0092
  • Karalar, S. (2015). Ödül yönetiminin örgütsel özdeşleşme ile işgücü atikliği üzerine etkisi ve bir araştırma (Doctoral dissertation). Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Edirne.
  • Karacaoğlu, K., & İnce, F. (2012). Brandes, Dharwadkar ve Dean’in (1999) örgütsel sinizm ölçeği Türkçe formunun geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması: Kayseri Organize Sanayi Bölgesi örneği. Business and Economics Research Journal, 3(2), 77-92.
  • Lombardo, M. M., & Eichinger, R. W. (2000). High potentials as high learners. Human Resource Management, 39(4), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-050x(200024)39:4<321::aid-hrm4>3.0.co;2-1
  • Lu, Y., & K. (Ram) Ramamurthy. (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS quarterly, 931-954. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409967
  • Muduli, A. (2016). Exploring the facilitators and mediators of workforce agility: an empirical study. Management Research Review, 39(12), 1567–1586. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-10-2015-0236
  • Muduli, A. (2017). Workforce agility: Examining the role of organizational practices and psychological empowerment. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 36(5), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21800
  • Muduli, A., & Choudhury, A. (2024). Digital technology adoption, workforce agility and digital technology outcomes in the context of the banking industry of India. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-01-2024-0018
  • Naim, M. F., Sahai, S., & Elembilassery, V. (2023). Does empowering leadership enhance employee agility? A serial mediation model. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 12(3), 666–682. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebhrm-08-2022-0197
  • Nguyen, T., Le, C. V., Nguyen, M., Nguyen, G., Lien, T. T. H., & Nguyen, O. (2024). The organisational impact of agility: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 1-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00446-9
  • Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000600
  • Özbay, D. (2017). Örgütsel sinizm ve işgücü atikliği arasındaki ilişki ve bir araştırma (Master’s thesis). Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Panda, S. (2024). The role of employee ambidexterity on employee agility: a moderation analysis with employee organizational tenure. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebhrm-07-2023-0178
  • Patil, M., & Suresh, M. (2019). Modelling the Enablers of Workforce Agility in IoT Projects: A TISM Approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00208-7
  • Pitafi, A. H., Rasheed, M. I., Islam, N., & Dhir, A. (2023). Investigating visibility affordance, knowledge transfer and employee agility performance. A study of enterprise social media. Technovation, 128, 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102874
  • Pitafi, A. H., Rasheed, M. I., Kanwal, S., & Ren, M. (2020). Employee agility and enterprise social media: The Role of IT proficiency and work expertise. Technology in Society, 63, 101333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101333
  • Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.4.612
  • Qin, R., & Nembhard, D. A. (2010). Workforce agility for stochastically diffused conditions—A real options perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(2), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.006
  • Rani, P. U., Cynthia, A. R., Priyankaa, S., & Kandaswamy, K. M. (2019). A flat organization model for agile workforce with reference to holacracy. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2), 1525-1527. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.b1096.0882s819
  • Rasheed, M. I., Pitafi, A. H., Mishra, S., & Chotia, V. (2023). When and how ESM affects creativity: The role of communication visibility and employee agility in a cross-cultural setting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122717
  • Sackey, B. B., Yang, J., Quansah, P. E., Ekumah, C. A., Arboh, F., & Boadu, B. (2024). Internal marketing orientation and employee innovative behaviour: the mediating role of workforce agility and moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhti-01-2024-0063
  • Salmen, K., & Festing, M. (2021). Paving the way for progress in employee agility research: a systematic literature review and framework. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(22), 4386–4439. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1943491
  • Sameer, S. K. (2024). The Interplay of digitalization, organizational support, workforce agility and task performance in a blended working environment: evidence from Indian public sector organizations. Asian Business &amp; Management, 23(2), 266–286. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-022-00205-2
  • Sharifi, H., & Zhang, Z. (1999). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: An introduction. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1–2), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-5273(98)00217-5
  • Sharma, K., Nigam, N., Jha, J. K., & Xu, X. (2024). Role of Readiness to Change in the Relationship Between Workforce Agility and Digital Transformation. Journal of Global Information Management, 32(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.345241
  • Sherehiy, B. (2008). Relationships between agility strategy, work organization and workforce agility. University of Louisville.
  • Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., & Layer, J. K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(5), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2007.01.007
  • Srigouri, V. V., & Muduli, A. (2024). Performance coaching and training transfer in micro, small and medium enterprises of India: examining the mediating role of employee agility. Journal of Management Development, 43(4), 556–570. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-12-2023-0360
  • Storme, M., Suleyman, O., Gotlib, M., & Lubart, T. (2020). Who is agile? An investigation of the psychological antecedents of workforce agility. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 39(6), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22055
  • Talwar, S., Luqman, A., Kaur, P., Srivastava, P., & Mishra, S. (2023). How social networking ties mediate the associations between enterprise social media affordances and employee agility? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 195, 122759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122759
  • Tamtam, F., & Tourabi, A. (2020). A Framework for Measuring Workforce Agility: Fuzzy Logic Approach Applied in a Moroccan Manufacturing Company. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 5(3), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj050352
  • Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
  • Tessarini Junior, G., & Saltorato, P. (2021). Workforce agility: a systematic literature review and a research agenda proposal. Innovar, 31(81), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v31n81.95582
  • Thayyib, P. V., & Khan, M. A. (2021). Do demographics influence workforce agility score of tax professionals in Bangalore, India? Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 40(4), 34–49. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22084
  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
  • Varshney, D., & Varshney, N. K. (2020). Workforce agility and its links to emotional intelligence and workforce performance: A study of small entrepreneurial firms in India. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 39(5), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22012
  • Verma, A. (2024). Agile Leadership in the VUCA World: Combating Challenges of the COVID-19 Pandemic. VUCA and Other Analytics in Business Resilience, Part A, 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-902-420241013
  • Weber, Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2014). Strategic Agility: A State of the Art Introduction to the Special Section on Strategic Agility. California Management Review, 56(3), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.5
  • Yang, C., Tang, C., Xu, N., & Lai, Y. (2024). Developmental human resource practices, thriving at work, and employee agility: The moderating role of workplace spirituality. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2024.15
  • Yauch, C. A. (2011). Measuring agility as a performance outcome. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 22(3), 384–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381111112738
  • Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi. (n.d.). Ulusal Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Zhang, D. Z. (2011). Towards theory building in agile manufacturing strategies—Case studies of an agility taxonomy. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.08.010
  • Zitkiene, R., & Deksnys, M. (2018). Organizational Agility Conceptual Model. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-2.7
There are 82 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Integrated Marketing Communication, Human Resources and Industrial Relations (Other), Business Administration, Advertisement
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Şükrü Barış Hatunoğlu 0000-0002-4956-518X

Publication Date December 31, 2024
Submission Date October 5, 2024
Acceptance Date November 19, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 11 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Hatunoğlu, Ş. B. (2024). WORKFORCE AGILITY: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND COMPARISON WITH DOMESTIC STUDIES. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 11(2), 101-121. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2024.1936

Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics (JMML) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annual and open-access online journal. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The publication languages of the Journal is English. JMML aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the areas of management, marketing, logistics, supply chain management, international trade. The editor in chief of JMML invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JMML charges no submission or publication fee.


Ethics Policy - JMML applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JMML is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.