The Evaluation of Different Feeds on Brine Shrimp, Artemia parthenogenetica Culture

Abstract

In this study, Artemia parthenogenetica was fed with either Spirulina (S), yeast (Y), rice bran (R), oat (O) or their combinations in 10 experimental groups in triplicate for 20 days in laboratory conditions and growth, biomass, feed conversion rate (FCR), specific growth rate (SGR), survival rate, crude protein, crude lipid contents were determined. The highest average body length obtained at the end of the experiment was 2.805±0.003 mm in treatments (S) and (SYR), and the highest average individual dry weight was 23.057 µg in treatment (S). The mean biomass changed between 167.2±0.003 mg and 115.7±0.012 mg. The highest biomass value was 20.9 g/m3 in treatment (S), followed by 20.5 g/m3 in treatment (SYR). The highest FCR was found to be similar in (S) and (Y) with 1.14±0.02. SGR was 1.01±0.001 in all experimental groups. The highest survival rate was in treatment (S), and overall it ranged between 78.22±1.78 - 90.64±0.06%. The highest crude protein contents of Artemia were found in (SR) and (S) and the highest lipid content was found in treatment (O). As a result, it is thought that combinations of by-products such as rice bran and yeast together with microalgae will be economical in the cultivation of Artemia parthenogenetica.

Keywords

• Artemia parthenogenetica
• culture
• feeds
• hypersaline waters
• zooplankton
• Hipersalin sular

Project Number

20L0447001.

Farklı Yemlerle Tuz Karidesi, Artemia parthenogenetica Üretiminin Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Artemia parthenogenetica laboratuvar koşullarında Spirulina (S), maya (M) pirinç kepeği (P), yulaf (Y) ve kombinasyonları ile 10 deneme grubunda üç tekerrürlü olarak, 20 gün süreyle beslenmişler ve büyüme, biyomas, yem değerlendirme oranı (YDO), spesifik büyüme oranı (SBO), yaşama oranı, ham protein, ham yağ içerikleri belirlenmiştir. Deneme sonunda elde edilen en yüksek ortalama uzunluk değeri 2,805±0,003 mm olarak (S) ve (SMP) gruplarında, en yüksek ortalama birey kuru ağırlık değeri 23,057±0,05 µg olarak (S) deneme grubunda ölçülmüştür. Elde edilen ortalama biyomas değerleri 167,2±0,003 mg ile 115,7±0,012 mg arasında değişmiştir. En yüksek biyomas değeri (S) deneme grubunda 20,9 g/m3 olmuş, onu (SMP) deneme grubu 20,5 g/m3 olarak izlemiştir. En iyi YDO (S) ve (M) deneme gruplarında (1,14±0,02) benzer bulunmuştur. SBO deneme gruplarında 1,01±0,001 olarak saptanmıştır. Yaşama oranı en yüksek (S)’de bulunmuş, bununla birlikte, deneme gruplarında %90,64±0,06 ile %78,22±1,78 arasında değişmiştir. Araştırma sonunda, Artemia’da, en yüksek ham protein oranları (SP) ve (S)’de, en yüksek yağ oranı ise sadece yulaf ile beslenen (Y) deneme grubunda saptanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, Artemia parthenogenetica yetiştiriciliğinde mikroalg ile birlikte pirinç kepeği ve maya gibi yan ürünlerle kombinasyonların ekonomik olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

• Artemia parthenogenetica
• Hipersalin sular
• Üretim
• Yemler
• Zooplankton

Supporting Institution

Ankara Üniversitesi

Project Number

20L0447001.

References

1. Abreu-Groboıs, F.A., Brıseno-Duenas, R., Herrera, M.A., Malagon, M.L. (1991). A model for growth of Artemia franciscana cultures based on food ration-dependent gross growth efficiencies. Hydrobiologia, 212, 27-37.
2. Agh, N., Van Stappen, G., Bossıer, P., Sepehrı, H., Lotfı, V., Razavı Rouhanı, S. M., Sorgeloos, P. (2008). Effects of salinity on survival, growth, reproductive and life span characteristics of Artemia populations from Urmia Lake and neighboring lagoons. Pak J Biol Sci, 11, 164-172. Doi:10.3923/pjbs.2008.164
3. Amat, F. (1980). Differentiation in Artemia strains from Spain.19-39. In: G. Persoone, O. Sorgeloos, O Roels, et al (Eds), The Brine Shrimp Artemia. Morphology, Genetics, Radiobiology, Toxicology (pp. 19-39). Belgium: Universa Press.
4. AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists 16th ed., Virginia, USA: Kenneth Arlington.
5. Basbug Saygı, Y., Demirkalp, F.Y. (2002). Effects of temperature on survival and growth of Artemia from tuz lake, Turkey. The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture-Bamidgeh, 54, 125-133. doi. 10.46989/001c.20319
6. Bengtson, D.A. (2003). Status of Marine Aquaculture in Relation to Live Prey: Past, Present and Future. In: J.G Stottrop, L.A. Mc Evoy (Eds), Live feeds in marine aquaculture (pp.1-16). UK: Blackwell Science Ltd.
7. Browne, R.A., Wanıgasekera, G. (2000). Combined effects of salinity and temperature on survival and reproduction of five species of Artemia. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 244, 29-44.
8. Bozok, M. (1996). Taze ve uygun koşullarda korunmuş Artemia sp. (İzmir-Çamaltı Tuzlası) yumurtalarının açılma oranlarının karşılaştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

9. Coutteau, P., Sorgeloos, P. (1989). Feeding of the brine shrimp Artemia on yeast: effect of mechanical disturbance, animal density, water quality and light intensity. no10, Bredene, Belgium: European Aquaculture Society Special Publication.
10. Coutteau, P., Brendonck, L., Lavens, P., Sorgeloos, P. (1992). The use of manipulated baker's yeast as an algal substitute for the laboratory culture of Anostraca. Hydrobiologia, 234, 25-32.
11. Dhont, J., Van Stappen, G. (2003). Biology, Tank Production and Nutritional Value of Artemia. 65-121. In: J.G. Stottrop, L.A. Mc Evoy (Eds), Live feeds in marine aquaculture (pp. 65-121). UK: Blackwell Science Ltd.
12. Garcıa-Ulloa Gomez, M., Gamboa Delgado, J., Zavala Aguırre, J.L., Ogura Fujıı, T., Lavens, P. (1999). Influence of different diets on length and biomass production of brine shrimp Artemia franciscana (Kellog, 1906) Bol Investig Mar Costeras, 28, 7-18.
13. Islam, M.S, Kıbrıa, M.M., Bhuyan, S. (2019). Production of Artemia Biomass in Indoor Culture Tank in Bangladesh. J Sci Res, 11, 101-110. doi.10.3329/jsr.v11i1.36467
14. Kesici, T., Kocabaş, Z. (2007), Biyoistatistik. II. Baskı, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eczacılık Fakültesi Yayını.
15. Koru, E., Dıraman, H. (2003). Çamaltı Tuzlası'ndaki (İzmir, Türkiye) Artemia parthenogenetica'nın Yağ Asitleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 20, 523-527.
16. Koru, E. (2004). Çamaltı Tuzlası (İzmir, Türkiye) Ekosisteminde Artemia ve Önemi. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 21, 187-189.
17. Koru, E. (2013), Çamaltı Tuzlası (Sasalı-İzmir) Artemia biyomasının Türkiye’de su ürünlerinde kullanımı için optimizasyon çalışmaları. Ege Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Yetiştiricilik Bölümü Yetiştiricilik ABD, Bornova-İzmir.
18. Koru, E. (2017). İzmir balıkçılığı. Birinci Bask. Bölüm: İzmir Çamaltı Tuzlası (Sasalı/Çiğli) ve Tuzla Karidesi: Artemia sp. (s. 223-228).İzmir: Kristal Reklam ve Matbaacılık
19. Kuruppu, M.M. Ekaratne, S.U.K. (1995). Effects of temperature and salinity of survival growth and fecundity of the brine shrimp Artemia parthenogenetica from Sri Lanka. J Natn Sci Coun Sri Lanka, 23, 161-169. Doi:10.4038/JNSFSR.V23I4.5854
20. Lasztıty, R. (1998). Oat grain a wonderful reservoir of natural nutrients and biologically active substances. Food Rev Int, 14, 99-119. Doi:10.1080/87559129809541150
21. Lavens, P., De Meulemeester, A, Sorgeloos, P. (1987). Evaluation of mono-and mixed diets as food for intensive Artemia culture. In: P. Sorgeloos, W. Decleir (Eds), Artemia Research and its Applications (pp. 309-318). Wetteren, Belgium: Universa Press.
22. Lavens, P., Sorgeloos, P. (1987). Design, operation, and potential of a culture system for the continuous production of Artemia nauplii.. In: P. Sorgeloos, W. Decleir (Eds), Artemia Research and its Applications (pp. 339-347). Wetteren, Belgium: Universa Press.
23. Lavens, P., Sorgeloos, P. (1991). Production of Artemia in culture tanks. In: R.A. Browne, P. Sorgeloos, C.N.A. Trotman (Eds), Artemia Biology (pp. 317-350). Florida: Published by CRC.
24. Lavens, P., Sorgeloos, P. (1996). Manual on the Production and Use of Live Food for Aquaculture. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. Laboratory of Aquaculture and Artemia Reference Center. University of Ghent, Belgium, 361.
25. Maldonado-Montıel, T.D.N.J., Rodrıguez-Canche, L.G. (2005). Biomass production and nutritional value of Artemia sp. (Anostraca: Artemiidae) in Campeche, Mexico. Rev Biol Trop, 53, 447-454. Doi:10.15517/rbt.v53i3-4.14613
26. Naegel, L.C., Gomez-Humaran, I.M. (1998). Effect of sample volume and population density on precision of larval population estimates. Aquacultural Engineering, 17, 11-19.
27. Naegel, L.C. (1999). Controlled production of Artemia biomass using an inert commercial diet, compared with the microalgae Chaetoceros. Aquacultural Engineering, 21, 49-59. DOI: 10.1016/s0144-8609(99)00023-0
28. Reeve, M.R. (1963). Growth efficiency in Artemia under laboratory conditions. The Biological Bulletin, 125, 133-145. Doi:10.1016/0044-8486(95)01250-8
29. Rıcker, W.E. (1975). Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. J Fish Res Board Can, 191, 1-382.
30. Rosnıyana, A., Hashıfah, M.A., Norın, S.S. (2007). The physicochemical properties and nutritional composition of rice bran produced at different milling degrees of rice. JTAFS, 35, 99-105.
31. Saygı, Y.B. (2004). Characterization of parthenogenetic Artemia populations from Camaltı (Izmir, Turkey) and Kalloni (Lesbos, Greece): survival, growth, maturation, biometrics, fatty acid profiles and hatching characteristics. Hydrobiologia, 527, 227-239. Doi:10.1023/b:hydr.0000043304.84579.d7
32. Sıvajı, S. (2016). Evaluation of different feeds for the culture of Artemia parthenogenetica. ARJMCS, 2, 8-14.
33. Sorgeloos, P., Baeza-Mesa, M., Bossuyt, E., Bruggeman, E., Dobbeleır, J., Versıchele, D., Lavına, E., Bernardıno, A. (1980). Culture of Artemia on rice bran: the conversion of a waste- product into highly nutritive animal protein. Aquaculture, 21, 393-396.
34. Sorgeloos, P., Lavens, P., Leger, P.H., Tackaert, W. , Versıchele, D. (1986). Manual for the Culture and Use of Brine Shrimp Artemia in Aquaculture. Laboratory of Mariculture, State University of Ghent, 319, Belgium.
35. Trıantaphyllidis, G.V., Poulopoulou, K., Abatzopoulos, T.J., Perez, C. A. P., Sorgeloos, P. (1995). International study on Artemia XLIX. Salinity effects on survival, maturity, growth, biometrics, reproductive and lifespan characteristics of a bisexual and a parthenogenetic population of Artemia. Hydrobiologia, 302, 215-227. Doi:10.3923/pjbs.2008.164.172
36. Trıantaphyllidis, G.V., Abatzopoulos, T.J., Sorgeloos, P. (1998). Review of the Biogeography of the Genus Artemia (Crustacea, Anostraca). Journal of Biogeography, 25, 213-226.
37. Vahdat, S., Oroujlou, M. (2021). Use of agriculture by-products (brans and meal) as food for Artemia franciscana (Kellogg, 1906) and effects on performance and biochemical compositions. Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 7, 23-40.
38. Vartak, V.R., Joshı, V.P. (2002). Effect of different feeds and water salinities on the cyst production of brine shrimp, Artemia sp. J Indian Fish Assoc, 29, 37-47.
39. Zmora, O., Shpigel, M. (2006). Intensive mass production of Artemia in a recirculated system. Aquaculture, 255, 488-494. Doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.01.018