Efficiency Analysis and Estimation of Factors Affecting the Efficiency with Decision Trees in Imbalanced Data: A Case of Turkey’s Environmental Sustainability

Abstract

Cities have proliferated and experienced increasing environmental issues in the modern world. The concept of environmental sustainability is one of the main problems to solve. Therefore, it is fundamental to establish statistical methods to measure environmental sustainability. The first aim of this study is to measure the environmental sustainability performance of 42 cities in Turkey by Data Envelopment Analysis. The second aim is to solve the imbalance in the efficiency values obtained using Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique methods. After all, we expose the multiple relationships between input and output variables and efficiency using the Decision trees classifiers approach. As a result of the analyses, three internal factors were found to influence the environmental efficiency levels: residential sales, population intensity, and the number of completed industrial sites. It has been determined that the number of completed industrial sites and the increase in residential sales distorted environmental efficiency.

Keywords

• Classification
• decision trees
• DEA
• environmental sustainability
• imbalanced data
• SMOTE

References

1. E. Marshall, J. Shortle, Using DEA and VEA to evaluate quality of life in the Mid-Atlantic States, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 34(2) (2005) 185–203.
2. H. C. Siong, M. Z. S. M Hussein, Modeling Urban Quality of Life with Data Envelopment Analysis Methods, Research Result Report, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, VOT78513, 2008.
3. Y. Yu, Z. Wen, Evaluating China’s Urban Environmental Sustainability with Data Envelopment Analysis, Ecological Economics (69) (2010) 1748–1755.
4. D. Yoshino, A. Fujiwara, J. Zhang, Environmental Efficiency Model Based on Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Application to Environmentally Sustainable Transport Policies, Transportation Research Record 2163(1) (2010) 112–123.
5. Z. Xiaoping, L. Yuanfang, W. Wenjia, Evaluation of Urban Resource and Environmental Efficiency in China Based on The DEA Model, Journal of Resources and Ecology 5(1) (2014) 11–19.
6. T. S. Adebayo, D. Kirikkaleli, I. Adeshola, D. Oluwajana, G. D. Akinsola, O. S. Osemeahon, Coal Consumption and Environmental Sustainability in South Africa: The Role of Financial Development and Globalization, International Journal of Renewable Energy Development 10(3) (2021) 527–536.
7. S. Kihombo, A. I. Vaseer, Z. Ahmed, S. Chen, D. Kirikkaleli, T. S. Adebayo, Is There a Trade-Off Between Financial Globalization, Economic Growth, and Environmental Sustainability? An Advanced panel Analysis, Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2021) 1–11.
8. S. A. R. Khan, P. Ponce, Z. Yu, H. Golpîra, M. Mathew, Environmental Technology and Wastewater Treatment: Strategies to Achieve Environmental Sustainability, Chemosphere 286 (2022) 131532.

9. R. Akbani, S. Kwek, N. Japkowicz, Applying Support Vector Machines to Imbalanced Datasets, Machine Learning: ECML of the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3201 (2004) 39–50.
10. H. He, Learning from Imbalanced Data, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 21(9) (2009) 1263–1284.
11. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, E. Rhodes, Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units, European Journal of Operations Research 2(6) (1978) 429–444.
12. R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, W. Cooper, Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science 30(9) (1984) 1078–1092.
13. T. Coelli, A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, Australia 96(08) (1996) 1–49.
14. R. Fare, S. Grosskopf, Modeling Undesirable Factors in Efficiency Evaluation: Comment, European Journal of Operational Research 157(1) (2004) 242–245.
15. A. Charnes, W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, L. M. Seiford, Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications, Journal of the Operational Research Society 48(3) (1997) 332–333.
16. W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, K. Tone, Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Journal of the Operational Research Society 52(12) (2001) 1408–1409.
17. S. Kotsiantis, D. Kanellopoulos, P. Pintelas, Handling Imbalanced Datasets: A Review, GESTS International Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering 30(1) (2006) 25–36.
18. R. S. Mitchell, J. G. Michalski, T. M. Carbonell, An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Berlin, Germany, Springer, 2013.
19. R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, https://www.R-project.org/
20. P. Bogetoft, L. Otto, Benchmarking with Dea, Sfa, and r (Vol. 157). Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
21. T. Therneau, B. Atkinson, (2019). rpart: Recursive Partitioning and Regression Trees. R package version 4.1-15. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpart