Tüketicilerin Online Marka Topluluklarına Katılımları Üzerinde Öz Benlik Uyumunun Rolü

Year 2019, , 553 - 573, 31.12.2019

Doç. Dr. Sertaç Çifci , Prof. Dr. Ruziye Cop Ezgi Gönenir

https://doi.org/10.22139/jobs.589079

Cited By: 1

Abstract

              Amaç: İşletmeler
gün geçtikçe tüketiciler ile daha iyi bir iletişim sağlayabilmek amacıyla marka
topluluklarına özellikle de online marka topluluklarına daha çok önem
vermektedir. İlişkisel pazarlama anlayışı ile birlikte başarılı işletmeler
marka topluluklarını, hem mevcut hem de potansiyel müşteriler ile uzun dönemli
ilişki kurmak için kullanmaktadır.
İlişkisel pazarlama,
tüketici katılımı ve marka ilişkileri konusunda işletme ile tüketici
etkileşimin daha iyi anlaşılmasını sağlamaktadır. İşletmeler açısından marka
topluluklarına tüketicilerin katılımlarını sağlanması oldukça önemlidir.
Aynı zamanda işletmelerin, tüketici katılımını etkileyen faktörleri tespit
edebilmeleri, pazarı anlayabilmek adına stratejik bir önem taşımaktadır.
Literatürde tüketici katılımını etkileyen pek çok faktör araştırmacılar
tarafından ele alınmıştır. Ancak son yıllarda pazarlama alanında gittikçe daha
çok konuşulan öz benlik uyumunun etkisi incelenmemiştir. Tüketicilerin,
gerçekte kendilerini nasıl gördükleri şeklinde tanımlanan öz benlik, satın alma
tercihlerinde kendileri ile uyumlu markalara yönelmelerine neden olmaktadır. Öz
benlik uyumu ise kişinin kendisini nasıl gördüğü ile işletmenin imajı arasında
algılamış olduğu benzerliktir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, öz benlik uyumunun tüketicilerin
online marka topluluklarına katılımları üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır.

                Yöntem

                Bu amaçla nicel araştırma yöntemi benimsenmiştir. Kolayda
örnekleme yöntemi ile ulaşılan 283 katılımcıdan anket formları aracılığı ile
veriler elde edilmiştir. Ölçümlerin geçerlilik-güvenilirlik analizlerinin
yapılması için SPSS ve Lisrel programları kullanılarak açıklayıcı ve
doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri uygulanmıştır. Daha sonra araştırma model ve
hipotezlerinin test edilebilmesi için veriler yapısal eşitlik modeli ile
analizi edilmiştir.

Bulgular

Analiz
sonucunda öz benlik uyumunun, yardım alma ve marka tutkusu ile katılımı olumlu
yönde etkilediği sonucuna varılmıştır. Ayrıca, yardım alma katılımı; hazcı ve
faydacı katılımı, marka tutkusu amaçlı katılım ise hazcı katılımı olumlu yönde
etkilemiştir.

Sonuç

Yapılan
bu çalışmanın pazarlama literatürüne iki temel katkısı vardır. İlki öz benlik
uyumunun tüketicilerin online marka topluluklarına katılımları üzerinde etkili
olduğu sonucudur. İşletmeler açısından oldukça önemli olan bu sonuç
göstermektedir ki, tüketiciler kendi öz benlikleri ile uyumlu algıladıkları
markaların online marka topluluklarına katılım göstermektedir. Bu da
işletmelerin pazarlama stratejilerini belirlerken, hedef kitlelerinin öz
benliklerini incelemeleri ve bu uyumun algılamasını daha da artıracak
faktörlerin üzerinde düşünmesi gerektiğidir. Çalışmanın ikinci katkısı ise
Baldus vd. (2015)’nin sunduğu dört temel katılımın kendi aralarında da
neden-sonuç ilişkilerine sahip oldukları ve yazarların belirtmiş olduğu gibi
online marka topluluklarına katılım üzerinde aynı düzeyde etkili olmadıkları
sonucudur. 

Keywords

Öz benlik uyumu, online marka toplulukları, tüketici katılımı

The Role of Self-congruence on Consumers’ Participation in Online Brand Communities

Abstract

Aim: In order to
provide the better communication with their consumers, firms have given more importance to brand communities, especially
online brand communities. Successful firms use their brand communities to
establish long-term relationships with both existing and potential customers
thanks to relationship marketing approach. Relationship marketing provides a
better understanding of business and consumer interaction in consumer
engagement and brand relationships. Ensuring the participation of consumers in
brand communities has been becoming very important for businesses day to day.
Besides, in order to understand the market better, identifying the factors that
affecting consumer participation is becoming the strategic tool for firms. In
literature, many researchers handled the factors that affecting consumer
participation. However, there
is no study to examine the effect of self-congruence which is becoming more important
in the marketing literature on the consumers’ participation in online brand
communities.  The self-concept is defined
as how consumers actually see themselves and consumers tend to prefer the brand
that they see closely their self-concept. Self-congruence is the similarity between how consumer
sees himself and perceived of the image of the business. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of
self-congruence on consumer participation in online brand communities.

Method: For this purpose, quantitative research method was
selected and the data obtained from 283 participants by the convenient sampling
method. We used exploratory, confirmatory factor analyses and structural
equation model to test our model and hypotheses. In this research, online brand
communities and firms that have the Instagram page are discussed. We aimed to
collect data from 350 people. Research data were collected in December 2018 in
Ankara. The questionnaire was applied to the participants who followed the
pages of brands in Instagram and volunteered to complete the survey. A pre-test
was conducted with 15 people and the deficiencies in understanding the
questions are solved. In the questionnaire form, there are two main demographic
variables questions: gender and age. Likert-type scale was used to measure the
main structures. A total of 350 questionnaires were distributed and after some
controls, 283 useful questionnaires were analysed. Looking at the demographic
structure of the participants, 46% were female (131) and 54% were male (152).
The participants’ mean age was 28.32 years. The SPSS and LISREL software
programs were used for data analysis.

Findings: Approaches of
Hair et al. (2006) and Fornel and Larcker (1981) have been adopted as the
methods to be used in the evaluation of the research models and hypotheses. It
was noted that the variance ratio explained in the results of each explanatory
factor analysis for the structures was greater than 50% and the eigenvalue was
greater than 1. The calculated values indicated that the structures in the
research model were measured reliably. After the explanatory factor analysis,
within the framework of Fornel and Larcker's (1981) approach, confirmatory
factor analysis was applied in order to evaluate the convergent and
discriminant validity of all structures under the title of construct validity.
As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, goodness of fit values were as
follows: Chi-square: 129.86; DF: 44; Chi-square / DF: 2.95; RMSEA: 0.083;
Normed Fit Index (NFI): 0.97; Non-Normed Fit Index (NNFI): 0.97; Comparative
Fit Index (CFI): 0.98; Incremental Fit Index (IFI): 0.98; Relative Fit Index
(RFI): 0.96; Goodness of Fit Index (GFI): 0.93; Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index
(AGFI): 0.87 and Standardized RMR: 0.028. It is seen that the goodness of fit
values are quite good. Correlation values, correlation squares, AVE and CR
values of the structures were calculated in order to evaluate the structures in
terms of validity of discrimination. Structural equation model analysis was
used to evaluate the research models and hypotheses. Goodness of fit values
obtained as a result of structural equation model are as follows: Chi-square:
144,39; DF: 49; Chi-square / DF: 2.94; RMSEA: 0.083; Normed Fit Index (NFI):
0.97; Non-Normed Fit Index (NNFI): 0.97; Comparative Fit Index (CFI): 0.98;
Incremental Fit Index (IFI): 0.98; Relative Fit Index (RFI): 0.96; Goodness of
Fit Index (GFI): 0.92; Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI): 0.87 and
Standardized RMR: 0.049. According to structural equation model results,
self-congruence has a positive effect on participation for helping (β = 0.67, t
value = 10.62). Self-congruence also has an effect on the participation of
consumers due to the importance of brand (β = 0.73, t value = 11.94). Helping
has a positive effect on both the hedonistic (β = 0.46, t value = 6.91) and the
utilitarian (β = 0.53, t value = 8.94) participation of consumers. Finally, the
effect of brand passion on hedonistic participation was determined (β = 0.19, t
value = 2.93).

Results: According to
the findings of the research, self-congruence positively affects the consumers’
participation in online brand communities for helping. Self-congruence also has
an impact on participation in online brand communities as a result of
consumers' caring or loving the brand, which is expressed as brand passion. In
this point, firms should be aware of how they are seen on consumers’ eyes and
how it is importance of this fit on their marketing strategies. The effect of
receiving helping on both hedonistic and utilitarian participation is also seen
in the analysis results. Brand passion also affects participation for
entertainment purposes. In short, self-congruence positively affects participation
in brand communities both for helping and brand passion. This study has two
main contributions for the marketing literature. Firstly, Baldus et al., (2015)
stated that all the factors of consumers’ participation in online brand
community in their study cannot be handled together and there are cause-effect
relations among themselves. In short, there are two main reasons why consumers
participate in online brand communities: getting help and brand passion.
Hedonic and utilitarian participation comes later as a secondary effect. The
second contribution is to reveal the effect of self-congruence on consumer
participation in brand communities. Self-congruence and consumer engagement are
seen as a valuable predictor of future business performance, both providing and
maintaining a competitive advantage. In future studies, it will be beneficial
to handle customer participation from a different point of view in terms of
consumer behaviour. Especially, examining the socio-psychological factors of
consumers as well as self-congruence may contribute.

Keywords

Self-congruence, online brand communities, consumers’ participation

References

• Aaker, J. L. (1999). The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression inPersuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 45-57.
• Bagozzi, R. P. (1996). The Role of Arousal in the Creation and Control of the Halo Effect in Attitude Models. Psychology & Marketing, 13(3), 235-264.
• Bagozzi, R. P. ve Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Antecedents and Purchase Consequencesof Customer Participation in Small Group Brand Communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(1), 45-61.
• Baldus, B. J., Voorhees, C. ve Calantone, R. (2015). Online Brand Community Engagement: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 978-985.
• Bhattacharya, C. B. ve Sen, S. (2003). Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies. Journal of marketing, 67(2), 76-88.
• Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B. ve Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer Engagement in a Virtual Brand Community: An Exploratory Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 105-114.
• Carlson, B. D. (2005). Brand-based community: The role of identification in developing a sense of community among brand users (Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University).
• Chaudhuri, A. ve Holbrook, M. B. (2002). Product-class Effects on Brand Commitment and Brand Outcomes: The Role of Brand Trust and Brand Affect. Journal of Brand Management, 10(1), 33-58.
• Cova, B. ve Pace, S. (2006). Brand Community of Convenience Products: New Forms of Customer Empowerment–The Case “My Nutella the Community”. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 1087-1105.
• Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The Relational-interdependent Self-Construal and Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 791.
• D'Astous, A. (1990). An İnquiry into the Compulsive Side of “Normal” Consumers. Journal of Consumer Policy, 13(1), 15-31.
• De Valck, K., Van Bruggen, G. H. ve Wierenga, B. (2009). Virtual Communities: A Marketing Perspective. Decision Support Systems, 47(3), 185-203.
• Ekinci, Y., Sirakaya-Turk, E. ve Preciado, S. (2013). Symbolic Consumption of Tourism Destination Brands. Journal of Business Research, 66(6), 711-718.
• Eroğlu, F. (2016). Kompulsif Satin Alma: Kişisel Faktörler, Postmodern Tüketim Şekilleri ve Reklama Karşi Tutumun Rolüne Yönelik Bir Araştirma, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(35): 253-282.
• Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
• Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373.
• Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S. ve Lee, A. Y. (1999). “I” Value Freedom, but “We” Value Relationships: Self-construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment. Psychological Science, 10(4), 321-326.
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
• Hagel, J. ve Armstrong, A. G. (1996). The Real Value of On-line Communities. Harvard Business Review, 74(3), 134-141.
• Hair Joseph, F., Anderson Rolph, E., Tatham Ronald, L. ve Black William, C. (1994). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Macmillan Publishing Company.
• Hogg, M. K., Cox, A. J. ve Keeling, K. (2000). The impact of Self-monitoring on Image Congruence and Product/brand Evaluation. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5/6), 641-667.
• Japutra, A., Ekinci, Y., ve Simkin, L. (2017). Self-Congruence, Brand Attachment and Compulsive Buying, Journal of Business Research, 52(3): 683-701.
• Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E. ve Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The Core Self‐Evaluations Scale: Development of a Measure. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 303-331.
• Kressmann, F., Sirgy, M. J., Herrmann, A., Huber, F., Huber, S. ve Lee, D. J. (2006). Direct and Indirect Effects of Self-Image Congruence on Brand Loyalty, Journal of Business Research, 59(9): 955-964.
• Madupu, V. ve Cooley, D. O. (2010). Antecedents and Consequences of Online Brand Community Participation: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Internet Commerce, 9(2), 127-147.
• Malär, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. D. ve Nyffenegger, B. (2011). “Emotional Brand Attachment and Brand Personality: The Relative Importance of the Actual and the Ideal Self”. Journal of Marketing, 75(4): 35-52.
• Markus, H. R. ve Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and The Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224.
• Mcalexander, J. H., Schouten J. W. ve Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building Brand Community, Journal of Marketing, 66(1): 38–54
• Muniz, A. M. ve O'guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand Community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412-432.
• Nambisan, S. ve Baron, R. A. (2007). Interactions in Virtual Customer Environments: Implications for Product Support and Customer Relationship Management". Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(2): 42-62.
• Neff, J. (2007). OMD Proves the Power of Engagement. Advertising Age, 78(27): 3-4.Patterson, P., Yu, T. ve De Ruyter, K. (2006). Understanding Customer Engagement in Services" In Advancing Theory, Maintaining Relevance, Proceedings of ANZMAC, Brisbane, Australia. 4-6.
• Quinton, S. ve Harridge-March, S. (2010). Relationships in Online Communities: The Potential for Marketers, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 4(1): 59-73.
• Roberts, James A. (1998). Compulsive Buying Among College Students: An Investigation of Its Antecedents, Consequences, and Implications for Public Policy. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32(2): 295-319.
• Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, L. ve Lagerspetz, K.M.J. (1999). Self-Evaluated, Self-Esteem, Peer-Educated, Self-Esteem and Defensive Egoism as Predictor of Adolescents Participation in Bullying Situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3: 121-140.
• Singelis, T. M. (1994). The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-construals”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5): 580-591.
• Sung, Y. ve Campbell, W. K. (2009). Brand Commitment in Consumer–Brand Relationships: An Investment Model Approach. Journal of Brand Management, 17(2): 97-113.
• Voyles, B. (2007). Beyond Loyalty: Meeting the Challenge of Customer Engagement. Economist Intelligence Unit, 1-15.
• Wang, Y. C. ve Fesenmaier, D. R. (2004). Modeling Participation in an Online Travel Community. Journal of Travel Research, 42 (3), 261-270.
• Wells, E. ve Marwel, G. (1976). Self-Esteem: It’s Conceptualization and Measurement. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc.
• Wu, Lan (2006). Excessive Buying: The Construct and a Causal Model. Dissertation Thesis, Georgia: Institute of Technology.
• Zaglia, M. E. (2013). Brand Communities Embedded in Social Networks. Journal of Business Research, 66(2), 216–223.