BibTex RIS Cite

Örgütsel Demokrasi ve Örgütsel Muhalefet Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Year 2014, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 1 - 16, 11.08.2014

Hasan Tutar , Guzel Sadykova

Abstract

                      Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı örgütsel demokrasi ile örgütsel muhalefetin arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktır. Araştırma bulgularına göre bu alanda çalışma yapan araştırmacılara ve özellikle uygulayıcılara veri sağlamak araştırmanın diğer bir amacıdır. Örgütsel demokrasi kişisel değerlere saygı, demokratik tutum, demokratik yönetim, demokratik davranış, otorite algısı boyutlarıyla ifade edilmiştir. Örgütsel muhalefet de açık muhalefet, dolaylı muhalefet, gizli muhalefetle nitelendirilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar kişisel değerlere saygının, demokratik yönetimin ve demokratik davranışın açık muhalefeti pozitif yönde açıkladığını göstermiştir. Demokratik tutumun açık muhalefeti negatif yönde açıkladığı bulunmuştur. Nihayet otorite algısının açık, dolaylı ve gizli muhalefeti negatif yönde açıkladığı görülmüştür.

 

Anahtar Kelimeler: Örgütsel Demokrasi, Çalışan Muhalefeti, Örgütsel Muhalefet.

Keywords

-

References

  • Kaynaklar
  • Aktan, C. C. (2006). Organizasyonlarda Yanlış Uygulamalara Karşı Bir Sivil Erdem, Ahlaki Tepki ve Vicdani Ret Davranışı: Whistleblowing. Mercek Dergisi, 1, 1-13.
  • Aslan, Ş. (2003). Hastane İşletmelerinde Örgütsel Çatışma: Teori ve Örnek Bir Uygulama. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1, 599- 609.
  • Bennis, W. (2003). On Becoming a Leader. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Pub.
  • Demir, M. (2010). Örgütsel Çatışma Yönetiminde Duygusal Zekanın Etkisi: Konaklama İşletmelerinde İşgörenlerin Algılamaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 11 (2), 199-211.
  • Daft, R. L. (2001). Organization Theory & Design. 7th Edition, South-Western Publishing.
  • Deth, J. V. (2000). Interesting, but Irrelevant: Social Capital and the Saliency Of Politics in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 37, 115-147.
  • Diamond, L. ve Plattner, M. F. (1995). Demokrasinin Küresel Yükselişi. Çev.: İhsan Sezal - Fatoş Dilber, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Eilerman, D. (2008). Conflict: Personal Dynamics and Choice. http://www.helium.com/items/882718-how-is-the-idea-of-conflict-management-related-to-human-resources, 03.01.2012.
  • Garner, J. T. (2006). When Things Go Wrong at Work: Expressions of Organizational Dissent at Interpersonal Influence. Dissertation, Abilene Christian University, http://repository.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/5879/etd-tamu-2006A-SCOM-Garner.pdf?sequence=1, 31.12.2011.
  • Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled Organizational Dissent: A Theoretical Essay. B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Ed.). Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 1-52.
  • Harrison, J. S. ve Freeman, E. (2004). Special Topic: Democracy In and Around Organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 49-53.
  • Kassing, J. W. (1997). Articulating, Antagonizing and Displacing: A Model of Employee Dissent. Communication Studies, 48(4), 311-332.
  • Kassing, J. W. (1998). Development and Validation of the Organizational Dissent Scale, Management Communication Quarterly, 12(2), 183-229.
  • Kassing, J. W. ve Avtgis, T. A. (1999). Examining the Relationship Between Organizational Dissent and Aggressive Communication, Management Communication Quarterly, 13(1), 100-115.
  • Kassing, J. W. (2001). From the Look of Things: Assessing Perceptions of Organizational Dissenters, Communication Research, 21, 553-574.
  • Kassing, J. W. (2009). In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time (An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent). Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 22, no. 3, 416-436.
  • Kassing, J. W. (2011). Stressing Out about Dissent: Examining the Relationship Between Coping Strategies and Dissent Expression. Communication Research Reports, 28(3), 225-234.
  • Kerr, J. L. (2004). The Limits of Organizational Democracy. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 81-95.
  • Landier, A., Sraer, D. ve Thesmar, D. (2009). Optimal Dissent in Organizations. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 761-794.
  • Macy, G. ve Neal, J. C. (1995). The Impact of Conflict – Generating Techniques on Student Reactions and Decision Quality. Business Communication Quarterly, 58(4), 39-45.
  • Martin, B. (2005). Bucking the System: Andrew Wilkie and the Difficult Task of the Whistleblower. http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/05overland.html, 04.01.2012.
  • McPhee, R. D. (1988). Vertical Communication Chains: Toward an İntegrated Approach. Management Communication Quarterly, 1, 455-493.
  • Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
  • Ötken, A. B. ve Cenkçi, T. (2013). Beş Faktör Kişilik Modeli ve Örgütsel Muhalefet Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Öneri Dergisi, 10 (399), 41-51.
  • Özdemir, M. (2010). Ankara İli Kamu Genel Liselerinde Görev Yapan Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Muhalefete İlişkin Görüşleri. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Perlow, L. A. (2003). When the Silence Spells Trouble at Work. http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3494.html, 04.01.2012.
  • Powley, E. H, Fry, R. E., Barrett, F. J. ve Bright, D. S. (2004). Dialogic Democracy Meets Command and Control: Transformation through the Appreciative Inquiry Summit. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 67-80.
  • Rizvi, F. (2005). In Defence of Organizational Democracy. Smyth, J. (Ed.), Critical Perspectives on Educational Leadership, Routledge, New York, 138-155.
  • Roberto, M. A. (2006). Why Great Leaders Don't Take Yes for an Answer. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey.
  • Robbins, S. P. (2005). Organizational Behavior. http://www.shareonme.com/en/file/107/organizational-behavior-9th-edition-by-stephen-p.-robbins-prentice-hall-international.rar.html, 04.01.2012.
  • Scott, C., Corman, S. ve Cheney, G. (1998). Development of a Structurational Model of İdentification in the Organization. Communication Theory, 8, 298-336.
  • Sprague, J. A. ve Ruud, G. L. (1988). Boat-Rocking in the High Technology Culture. American Behavioral Scientist, 32(2), 169-193.
  • Stewart, L. P. (1980). “Whistle Blowing”: Implications for Organizational Communication. Journal of Communication, 30, 90-101.
  • Stohl, C. ve Cheney, G. (2001). Participatory Processes/Paradoxical Practices: Communication and the Dilemmas of Organizational Democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 349-407.
  • Stolle, D. (1998). Bowling Together, Bowling Alone: The Development of Generalized Trust in Voluntary Associations. Political Psychology, 19, 497-525.
  • Strong, B. (2002). The Importance of a Dissenting Voice in Business. http://strong.groups.et.byu.net/pages/articles/articles/dissent.pdf, 03.01.2012.

Year 2014, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 1 - 16, 11.08.2014

Hasan Tutar , Guzel Sadykova

Abstract

References

  • Kaynaklar
  • Aktan, C. C. (2006). Organizasyonlarda Yanlış Uygulamalara Karşı Bir Sivil Erdem, Ahlaki Tepki ve Vicdani Ret Davranışı: Whistleblowing. Mercek Dergisi, 1, 1-13.
  • Aslan, Ş. (2003). Hastane İşletmelerinde Örgütsel Çatışma: Teori ve Örnek Bir Uygulama. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1, 599- 609.
  • Bennis, W. (2003). On Becoming a Leader. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Pub.
  • Demir, M. (2010). Örgütsel Çatışma Yönetiminde Duygusal Zekanın Etkisi: Konaklama İşletmelerinde İşgörenlerin Algılamaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 11 (2), 199-211.
  • Daft, R. L. (2001). Organization Theory & Design. 7th Edition, South-Western Publishing.
  • Deth, J. V. (2000). Interesting, but Irrelevant: Social Capital and the Saliency Of Politics in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 37, 115-147.
  • Diamond, L. ve Plattner, M. F. (1995). Demokrasinin Küresel Yükselişi. Çev.: İhsan Sezal - Fatoş Dilber, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Eilerman, D. (2008). Conflict: Personal Dynamics and Choice. http://www.helium.com/items/882718-how-is-the-idea-of-conflict-management-related-to-human-resources, 03.01.2012.
  • Garner, J. T. (2006). When Things Go Wrong at Work: Expressions of Organizational Dissent at Interpersonal Influence. Dissertation, Abilene Christian University, http://repository.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/5879/etd-tamu-2006A-SCOM-Garner.pdf?sequence=1, 31.12.2011.
  • Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled Organizational Dissent: A Theoretical Essay. B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Ed.). Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 1-52.
  • Harrison, J. S. ve Freeman, E. (2004). Special Topic: Democracy In and Around Organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 49-53.
  • Kassing, J. W. (1997). Articulating, Antagonizing and Displacing: A Model of Employee Dissent. Communication Studies, 48(4), 311-332.
  • Kassing, J. W. (1998). Development and Validation of the Organizational Dissent Scale, Management Communication Quarterly, 12(2), 183-229.
  • Kassing, J. W. ve Avtgis, T. A. (1999). Examining the Relationship Between Organizational Dissent and Aggressive Communication, Management Communication Quarterly, 13(1), 100-115.
  • Kassing, J. W. (2001). From the Look of Things: Assessing Perceptions of Organizational Dissenters, Communication Research, 21, 553-574.
  • Kassing, J. W. (2009). In Case You Didn't Hear Me the First Time (An Examination of Repetitious Upward Dissent). Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 22, no. 3, 416-436.
  • Kassing, J. W. (2011). Stressing Out about Dissent: Examining the Relationship Between Coping Strategies and Dissent Expression. Communication Research Reports, 28(3), 225-234.
  • Kerr, J. L. (2004). The Limits of Organizational Democracy. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 81-95.
  • Landier, A., Sraer, D. ve Thesmar, D. (2009). Optimal Dissent in Organizations. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 761-794.
  • Macy, G. ve Neal, J. C. (1995). The Impact of Conflict – Generating Techniques on Student Reactions and Decision Quality. Business Communication Quarterly, 58(4), 39-45.
  • Martin, B. (2005). Bucking the System: Andrew Wilkie and the Difficult Task of the Whistleblower. http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/05overland.html, 04.01.2012.
  • McPhee, R. D. (1988). Vertical Communication Chains: Toward an İntegrated Approach. Management Communication Quarterly, 1, 455-493.
  • Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
  • Ötken, A. B. ve Cenkçi, T. (2013). Beş Faktör Kişilik Modeli ve Örgütsel Muhalefet Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Öneri Dergisi, 10 (399), 41-51.
  • Özdemir, M. (2010). Ankara İli Kamu Genel Liselerinde Görev Yapan Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Muhalefete İlişkin Görüşleri. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Perlow, L. A. (2003). When the Silence Spells Trouble at Work. http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3494.html, 04.01.2012.
  • Powley, E. H, Fry, R. E., Barrett, F. J. ve Bright, D. S. (2004). Dialogic Democracy Meets Command and Control: Transformation through the Appreciative Inquiry Summit. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 67-80.
  • Rizvi, F. (2005). In Defence of Organizational Democracy. Smyth, J. (Ed.), Critical Perspectives on Educational Leadership, Routledge, New York, 138-155.
  • Roberto, M. A. (2006). Why Great Leaders Don't Take Yes for an Answer. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey.
  • Robbins, S. P. (2005). Organizational Behavior. http://www.shareonme.com/en/file/107/organizational-behavior-9th-edition-by-stephen-p.-robbins-prentice-hall-international.rar.html, 04.01.2012.
  • Scott, C., Corman, S. ve Cheney, G. (1998). Development of a Structurational Model of İdentification in the Organization. Communication Theory, 8, 298-336.
  • Sprague, J. A. ve Ruud, G. L. (1988). Boat-Rocking in the High Technology Culture. American Behavioral Scientist, 32(2), 169-193.
  • Stewart, L. P. (1980). “Whistle Blowing”: Implications for Organizational Communication. Journal of Communication, 30, 90-101.
  • Stohl, C. ve Cheney, G. (2001). Participatory Processes/Paradoxical Practices: Communication and the Dilemmas of Organizational Democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 349-407.
  • Stolle, D. (1998). Bowling Together, Bowling Alone: The Development of Generalized Trust in Voluntary Associations. Political Psychology, 19, 497-525.
  • Strong, B. (2002). The Importance of a Dissenting Voice in Business. http://strong.groups.et.byu.net/pages/articles/articles/dissent.pdf, 03.01.2012.
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makale
Authors

Hasan Tutar

Guzel Sadykova

Publication Date August 11, 2014
Submission Date April 25, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 2 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Tutar, H., & Sadykova, G. (2014). Örgütsel Demokrasi ve Örgütsel Muhalefet Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir İnceleme. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, 2(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.22139/ibd.26606

Creative Commons Lisansı   Bu dergi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.