Research Article

Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Recognition of the Circassian Genocide: Strategic Engagement with North Caucasian Causes [Ukrayna ve Gürcistan'ın Çerkes Soykırımı'nı Tanıması: Kuzey Kafkasya Davalarıyla Stratejik İlişki]

Volume: 10 Number: 16 May 31, 2025
TR RU EN

Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Recognition of the Circassian Genocide: Strategic Engagement with North Caucasian Causes [Ukrayna ve Gürcistan'ın Çerkes Soykırımı'nı Tanıması: Kuzey Kafkasya Davalarıyla Stratejik İlişki]

Abstract

On January 9, 2025, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine declared the Russian conquest of Circassia in the nineteenth century as a genocide. Ukraine thus became the second country after Georgia in 2011 to recognizer the Circassian genocide. The Russian Empire’s complete conquest of Circassia in 1864, as part of a greater strategy to subdue the Caucasus, led to the massive killing, starvation, and deportation of Circassians, who to this day are scattered throughout the Western countries, the Middle East, and Russia. The Circassian movement is divided in its ultimate goals but seeks to gain greater cultural, linguistic and political rights with Russia, to secure repatriation of the diaspora, and to merge all North Caucasus republics with a substantial Circassian population into one, or to even gain independence from or a greater sense of autonomy within the Russian Federation. As part of a grander strategy to limit Russian influence in the region and to avenge the losses of separatist territories in 2008, the Georgian government recognized the conquest of Circassia as a genocide on May 20, 2011, as part of a greater strategy for Tbilisi to gain greater influence and leverage with the peoples of the North Caucasus, especially the Circassians. This strategy also included the weaponization of conferences, the creation of cross-cultural and education programs, the dissemination of Georgian-sponsored media in the North Caucasus, open travel of North Caucasians into Georgia, and greater political and economic cooperation between Georgia and the North Caucasus. Although the current ruling establishment has stepped back from many of these initiatives, Tbilisi’s past rapprochement with Circassians and other North Caucasus groups has led to the strengthening of Circassian activism and encouraged Ukraine since the start of the current war with Russia to embrace the mantle of Pan-Caucasus causes. Through recognizing the Circassian genocide and supporting other separatist movements and organizations in the North Caucasus, Kyiv has emerged as a replacement of Tbilisi to support stateless peoples within the Russian sphere.

Keywords

References

  1. Aliyev, Huseyn. “Georgian Foreign Policy toward the North Caucasus.” International Master Security, Intelligence, and Strategic Studies. University of Glasgow, University of Trento, Charles University: 2023, https://dspace.cuni.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.11956/187347/120456442.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  2. Bagrationi, Niko. “Parlament Gruzii rassmotrit vopros priznaniya genotsida cherkesov.” [The Parliament of Georgia Will Consider the Question of the Recognition of the ‘Circassian genocide’]. Kavkazskiy Uzel, June 26, 2012, https://www.kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/208746.
  3. Bagrationi, Niko. “V Gruzii nachalis’ meropriyatiya pamyati zhertv Kavkazskoy voiny.” [In Georgia Events for Monuments of the Casualties of the Caucasus War Began]. Kavkazskiy Uzel, May 22, 2012, https://www.kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/206940/.
  4. Bardouka, Yousef. “Ukraine recognises Circassian Genocide.” OC Media, January 9, 2025, https://oc-media.org/ukraine-recognises-circassian-genocide/.
  5. Barry, Ellen. “Georgia Says Russia Committed Genocide in 19th Century.” New York Times, 20 May 2011.
  6. Besleney, Zeynel Abidin. “Circassian Nationalism and the Internet.” OpenDemocracy.net, May 21, 2010, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/circassian-nationalism-and-internet/.
  7. Besleney, Zeynel Abidin. The Circassian Diaspora in Turkey: A Political History. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.
  8. Bullough, Oliver. Let Our Fame be Great: Journeys Among the Defiant People of the Caucasus. New York: Basic Books, 2010.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

European and Region Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

May 31, 2025

Publication Date

May 31, 2025

Submission Date

April 3, 2025

Acceptance Date

April 29, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 10 Number: 16

APA
Kelbaugh, M. (2025). Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Recognition of the Circassian Genocide: Strategic Engagement with North Caucasian Causes [Ukrayna ve Gürcistan’ın Çerkes Soykırımı’nı Tanıması: Kuzey Kafkasya Davalarıyla Stratejik İlişki]. Kafkasya Çalışmaları, 10(16), 79-116. https://doi.org/10.21488/jocas.1669449
AMA
1.Kelbaugh M. Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Recognition of the Circassian Genocide: Strategic Engagement with North Caucasian Causes [Ukrayna ve Gürcistan’ın Çerkes Soykırımı’nı Tanıması: Kuzey Kafkasya Davalarıyla Stratejik İlişki]. JOCAS. 2025;10(16):79-116. doi:10.21488/jocas.1669449
Chicago
Kelbaugh, Matthew. 2025. “Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Recognition of the Circassian Genocide: Strategic Engagement With North Caucasian Causes [Ukrayna Ve Gürcistan’ın Çerkes Soykırımı’nı Tanıması: Kuzey Kafkasya Davalarıyla Stratejik İlişki]”. Kafkasya Çalışmaları 10 (16): 79-116. https://doi.org/10.21488/jocas.1669449.
EndNote
Kelbaugh M (May 1, 2025) Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Recognition of the Circassian Genocide: Strategic Engagement with North Caucasian Causes [Ukrayna ve Gürcistan’ın Çerkes Soykırımı’nı Tanıması: Kuzey Kafkasya Davalarıyla Stratejik İlişki]. Kafkasya Çalışmaları 10 16 79–116.
IEEE
[1]M. Kelbaugh, “Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Recognition of the Circassian Genocide: Strategic Engagement with North Caucasian Causes [Ukrayna ve Gürcistan’ın Çerkes Soykırımı’nı Tanıması: Kuzey Kafkasya Davalarıyla Stratejik İlişki]”, JOCAS, vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 79–116, May 2025, doi: 10.21488/jocas.1669449.
ISNAD
Kelbaugh, Matthew. “Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Recognition of the Circassian Genocide: Strategic Engagement With North Caucasian Causes [Ukrayna Ve Gürcistan’ın Çerkes Soykırımı’nı Tanıması: Kuzey Kafkasya Davalarıyla Stratejik İlişki]”. Kafkasya Çalışmaları 10/16 (May 1, 2025): 79-116. https://doi.org/10.21488/jocas.1669449.
JAMA
1.Kelbaugh M. Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Recognition of the Circassian Genocide: Strategic Engagement with North Caucasian Causes [Ukrayna ve Gürcistan’ın Çerkes Soykırımı’nı Tanıması: Kuzey Kafkasya Davalarıyla Stratejik İlişki]. JOCAS. 2025;10:79–116.
MLA
Kelbaugh, Matthew. “Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Recognition of the Circassian Genocide: Strategic Engagement With North Caucasian Causes [Ukrayna Ve Gürcistan’ın Çerkes Soykırımı’nı Tanıması: Kuzey Kafkasya Davalarıyla Stratejik İlişki]”. Kafkasya Çalışmaları, vol. 10, no. 16, May 2025, pp. 79-116, doi:10.21488/jocas.1669449.
Vancouver
1.Matthew Kelbaugh. Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Recognition of the Circassian Genocide: Strategic Engagement with North Caucasian Causes [Ukrayna ve Gürcistan’ın Çerkes Soykırımı’nı Tanıması: Kuzey Kafkasya Davalarıyla Stratejik İlişki]. JOCAS. 2025 May 1;10(16):79-116. doi:10.21488/jocas.1669449

Cited By

All rights reserved. 2015 © Copyright JOCAS