Dina Arma’nın ‘Eve Giden Yol’ (Doroga domoy, 2009) Romanında Hafıza, Tarih ve Benlik Kavramlarının İnşası

Year 2016, , 101 - 142, 19.03.2016

Lidia Zhigunova

https://doi.org/10.21488/jocas.27782

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Geçmişte ve günümüzde toplumsal tarihi inkar edilen, ulusal varlığı değersizleştirilip hor görülen bir halk olan Çerkeslerin entellektüel ve edebi kurgularında tarih kavramı endişe ve kızgınlık kaynağıdır. Dina Arma’nın Rusça yazılmış otobiyografik romanı Eve Giden Yol (Doroga domoy), ait olduğu mekanlardan koparılmış, kimlik arayışı içinde olan bir bireyin kendini tanıma serüvenin kültürlerarası ilişkiler perspektifinden anlatımıdır. Bu roman kimlik bunalımı kavramını ve kendi kimliğini tanımlamaya ve kendi parçalanmış tarihinin parçalarını bir araya getirmeye çalışan, geçmişte sömürgeleştirilmiş ve halen de sömürge durumunda olan bir halka ait bireyin yaşadığı hayal kırıklığı ve öfkeyi betimliyor.  Bu roman aynı zamanda, geçmişin ve kolonyal karşılaşmalarla yıpranmış ‘öz’ün yeniden keşfi serüveninde yaşanan ulusal hafızanın uyanışını anlatıyor. Ben bu makalede şu sorulara yanıt bulmaya çalışacağım:  Yazar, mekan ya da ev kavramlarını nasıl kurguluyor ve tanımlıyor? Bu kavramların hafıza ve kimlik kavramlarıyla ilişkisi nedir? Yazar tarihi yeniden yazma ve kurgulama sürecini nasıl gerçekleştiriyor? Yeniden var olma ve bireyin kendi kültür ve kimliğini dönüştürme yöntemlerini nasıl tanımlıyor?

Keywords

Post-kolonyal Çerkes literatürü, hafızanın dekolonizasyonu, travma, tarih dışı bırakılmak, ulusötesilik, benliğin inşası, sınır düşüncesi ve var olma hali

Memory, History, and the Construction of Self in Dina Arma’s Novel The Road Home (Doroga domoy) (2009)

Abstract

History looms large in Circassian intellectual and literary imagination as a source of anxiety, anger, and affirmation for a people who were and still are denied history, whose humanity was at once disdained and derided. Dina Arma’s autobiographical novel in Russian The Road Home (Дорога домой) is a narrative of self-exploration written from the transcultural perspective of a displaced person in search of her identity. It is a novel about identity crisis and the frustrations of a person striving to capture and to define his or her identity, especially if that person was and remains a colonial person who struggles to put together the fragmented pieces of his or her shattered history. It is a novel that describes the reawakening of national memory that takes place through the process of recovering the past and the self that has been damaged by colonial encounters. In the following article, I will examine the questions: How does Arma construct and define the concept of place or home? How does it relate to memory and identity? How does Arma engage in the process of rewriting and reconstructing history and how does she articulate the ways of re-existence and transformation of one’s culture and identity?

Keywords

Circassian (post)colonial literature, the road home, decolonization of memory, trauma, historical omissions, transnationality, construction of self, border thinking and being

References

• Adzhuk-Girei (Lokhvitsky), M. (1991), Poiski bogov (In Search of Gods), Merani: Tbilisi.
• Adzinov, M. (2010), Na beregakh moei pechali (On the Shores of My Sorrow). GP KBR "Respublikasnkii Poligrafkombinat im, Revolutsii 1905 g.: Nalchik.
• Anzaldşa, G. (1999), Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza, Aunt Lute Books: San Francisco.
• Arma, D. (2009), Doroga Domoi (The Road Home), Elbrus: Nalchik.
• Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., Tiffin, H. (2002), The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literature, Routledge: New York.
• Azouqa, A. O. (2004), The Circassians in the Imperial Discourse of Pushkin, Lermontov, and Tolstoy, Amman: Publications of Deanship of Academic Research of University of Jordan.
• Brower, D R., Lazzerini E. J. (1997), Russia's Orient: Imperial Borderlands and Peoples, 1700-1917, Indiana University Press: Bloomington.
• Byron, G. G. (1967), Don Juan. Cantos I-IV, Routledge & K. Paul: London.
• Catic, M. (2015), “Circassians and the Politics of Genocide Recognition”, Europe-Asia Studies, 67/10, 1685-1708.
• Damian, D. (2006), V Vashem mire ya-prokhozhii (I Am a Stranger in Your World), KomKniga: Moscow.
• Ditson, G. L. (1850), Circassia; Or, A Tour to the Caucasus, Stringer & Townsend: New York.
• Doğan, S. N. (2010), “From National Humiliation to Difference: The image of the Circassian Beauty in the Discourses of Circassian Diaspora Nationalists”, New Perspectives on Turkey, 42, 77-102.
• Emkuzhev, M. (2009), Noch Kaddar (Kaddar Night), Nezavisimoe Izdatel’stvo “Pik”: Moscow.
• Jersild, A. (2002), Orientalism and Empire: North Caucasus Mountain Peoples and the Georgian Frontier, 1845-1917, McGill-Queen's University Press: Montreal & Ithaca.
• Quandour, M. (1996-97), Kavkaz (The Caucasus: A Trilogy), Izdatelskii Centre Elfa: Nalchik.
• Keating, A. L. (1996), Women Reading Women Writing: Self-Invention in Paula Gunn Allen, Gloria Anzaldşa, and Audre Lorde, Temple University Press: Philadelphia.
• King, C. (2008), The Ghost of Freedom: A History of the Caucasus, Oxford University Press: Oxford & New York.
• Koshubaev, D. (1999), Abrag (Abrag), Elbrus: Nalchik.
• Kreiten, I. (2009), “A Colonial Experiment in Cleansing: The Russian Conquest of the Western Caucasus, 1856-65”, Journal of Genocide Research, 11/2-3, 213-241.
• Kuek, N. (2002), Vino Mertvykh (Vine of the Dead), Maikop.
• Layton, S. (1994), Russian Literature and Empire: Conquest of the Caucasus from Pushkin to Tolstoi, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
• Lermontov, M. (2013), A Hero of Our Time, Trans. by Slater, N. P., Oxford University Press: Oxford.
• Lugones, M. (1987), “Playfulness, “World”- Travelling, and Loving Perception”, Hypatia, 2/2, 3-19.
• Moore, D. C. (2001), “Is the Post- in Postcolonial the Post- in Post-Soviet? Toward a Global Postcolonial Critique”, PMLA, 116/1, 111-128.
• Murray-Ballou, M. (2006), The Circassian Slave, or, the Sultan’s Favorite, Dodo Press: Gloucester, UK.
• Pushkin, A. S. (1962-1966), Polnoe sobranie sochineni v desyati tomakh, 10 vols, Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR: Moscow.
• Rich, A. (1972), "When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision", College English, 34/1, 18-30.
• Richmond, W. (2008), The Northwest Caucasus: Past, Present, Future, Routledge: London & New York.
• _________. (2013), The Circassian Genocide, Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick, New Jersey and London.
• Shami, S. (1998), "Circassian Encounters: The Self as Other and the Production of the Homeland in the North Caucasus", Development & Change, 29, 4/10, 617- 646.
• ________(2000), "Prehistories of Globalization: Circassian Identity in Motion" Public Culture, 12, 1/01, 177-204.
• Sukunov, K., Sukunova, I. (1992), Cherkeshenka (The Circassian Woman), RIPO: Maikop.
• Tekueva, M. A. (2006), Muzhchina i Zhenshchina v Adygskoĭ kul′ture: Tradit︠s︡ii i Sovremennost′ (Man and Woman in Circassian Culture: Tradition and Modernity), Nalchik: GP KBR "Respublikanskiĭ poligrafkombinat im. Revoli︠u︡ t︠s︡ii 1905: Ėl′-Fa.
• Tlostanova, M. V. (2010), Gender Epistemologies and Eurasian Borderlands, Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
• ___________(2014), “Coloniality of Memory: violence-trauma
• repentance-revenge in postdependence narratives”, Jazyk, Slovesnost,
• Kultura (Language, Philology, Culture), 5, 63-87.
• Toledano, E.R. (2006), “Shemsigul: A Circassian Slave in Mid-Nineteenth Century Cairo”, Struggle and Survival in the Modern Middle East, Edmund Burke, III and David N. Yaghoubian (eds.), University of California Press: Berkeley, Los Angeles and London, 59-74.
• Voltaire. (2003), Philosophical Letters: Letters Concerning the English Nation, Dover Publications: Mineola & New York.
• Zhemukhov, S., Aktürk, Ş. (2015), “The Movement Toward a Monolingual Nation in Russia: The Language Policy in the Circassian Republics of the Northern Caucasus”, Journal of Caucasian Studies, 1/1, 35-71.