Telehealth From A Patient Perspective

Abstract

Telemedicine is a field of healthcare that involves the use of telecommunication technologies to provide remote medical care. By leveraging technologies such as videoconferencing, remote monitoring, and electronic messaging, healthcare providers can diagnose and treat patients in remote locations, without the need for in-person visits. Telemedicine has the potential to improve patient access to care, reduce healthcare costs, and improve health outcomes, especially for patients who live in rural or remote areas. In addition to the benefits outlined above, telemedicine has also been shown to improve patient satisfaction and reduce hospital readmission rates. Patients appreciate the convenience of being able to connect with their healthcare providers from their homes, without having to travel long distances or sit in crowded waiting rooms. Moreover, telemedicine can be especially beneficial for patients who have mobility limitations, live in rural areas, or are unable to leave their homes due to chronic illnesses. Overall, the rise of telemedicine is a positive development for patients, offering a range of benefits that can help improve their overall health and wellbeing. With the ongoing development of telemedicine technologies, the field is poised to play an increasingly important role in the delivery of healthcare services in the years to come. This study provides an overview of telemedicine and identifies its benefits and challenges. It also compares and analyzes the all-round performance of telemedicine technology compared to conventional medical services.

Keywords

• telemedicine
• telehealth
• digital health
• patient satisfaction
• patient-centered care
• patient experience
• remote consultations
• healthcare delivery

References

1. Abut, T., & Soygüder, S. (2015). Motion control in virtual reality based teleoperation system. In 2015 23nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) (pp. 2682-2685). IEEE.
2. Abut, T., & Soyguder, S. (2017). Real-time control of bilateral teleoperation system with adaptive computed torque method. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 44(3), 299-311.
3. Bashshur, R. L., Shannon, G. W., & Krupinski, E. A. (2016). The taxonomy of telemedicine. Telemedicine and e-Health, 22(8), 563-573. Doniec, R. J., Piaseczna, N. J., Szymczyk, K. A., Jacennik, B., Sieciński, S., Mocny-Pachońska, K., Duraj, K., Cedro, T.,
4. Tkacz, E. J., & Glinkowski, W. M. (2022). Experiences of the Telemedicine and eHealth Conferences in Poland—A Cross-National Overview of Progress in Telemedicine. Applied Sciences, 13(1), 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010587
5. Dorsey, E. R., & Topol, E. J. (2016). State of telehealth. New England journal of medicine, 375(2), 154-161.
6. Dorsey, E., Okun, M. S., & Bloem, B. R. (2020). Care, convenience, comfort, confidentiality, and contagion: the 5 C’s that will shape the future of telemedicine. Journal of Parkinson's disease, 10(3), 893-897.
7. Dullet, N. W., Geraghty, E. M., Kaufman, T., Kissee, J. L., King, J., Dharmar, M., ... & Blackburn, S. (2017). Impact of a university-based outpatient telemedicine program on time savings, travel costs, and environmental pollutants. Value in health, 20(4), 542-546.
8. Ekeland, A. G., Bowes, A., & Flottorp, S. (2010). Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. International journal of medical informatics, 79(11), 736-771.

9. Haukipuro, K., Ohinmaa, A., Winblad, I., & Linden, T. (2018). Ethical implications of e-health including telemedicine in the context of aging: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 11-19.
10. Hollander, J. E., & Carr, B. G. (2020). Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(18), 1679-1681. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2003539
11. Jnr, B. A. (2020). Use of telemedicine and virtual care for remote treatment in response to COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of medical systems, 44(7), 132.
12. Kay, M., Santos, J., and Takane, M. (2011). mhealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies. World Health Organization, 64(7):66–71.
13. Kruse, C. S., Krowski, N., Rodriguez, B., Tran, L., Vela, J., & Brooks, M. (2017). Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ open, 7(8), e016242. Kvedar, J., Coye, M. J., & Everett, W. (2014). Connected health: A review of technologies and strategies to improve patient care with telemedicine and telehealth. Health Affairs, 33(2), 194-199. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0992
14. Ma, Y., Zhao, C., Zhao, Y., Lu, J., Jiang, H., Cao, Y., & Xu, Y. (2022). Telemedicine application in patients with chronic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22(1), 1-14.
15. Martin-Payo, R., Carrasco-Santos, S., Cuesta, M., Stoyan, S., Gonzalez-Mendez, X., and Fernandez-Alvarez, M. d. M. (2021). Spanish adaptation and validation of the user version of the mobile application rating scale (uMARS). Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(12):2681–2686.
16. Mendi, O., Sari, M. K., Stoyanov, S., and Mendi, B. (2022). Development and validation of the Turkish version of the mobile app rating scale MARS-TR. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 166:104843. Messner, E.-M., Terhorst, Y., Barke, A., Baumeister, H., Stoyanov, S., Hides, L., Kavanagh, D., Pryss, R., Sander, L.,
17. Probst, T., et al. (2020). The German version of the mobile app rating scale (MARS -G): development and validation study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(3):e14479.
18. Miro, J., Llorens-Vernet, P., et al. (2021). Assessing the quality of mobile health-related apps: interrater reliability study of two guides. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 9(4):e26471.
19. Payo, R. M., Álvarez, M. F., Díaz, M. B., Izquierdo, M. C., Stoyanov, S. R., and Suárez, E. L. (2019). Spanish adaptation and validation of the mobile application rating scale questionnaire. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 129:95–99.
20. Ohannessian, R., Duong, T. A., & Odone, A. (2020). Global telemedicine implementation and integration within health systems to fight the COVID-19 pandemic: A call to action. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(2), e18810. doi:10.2196/18810
21. Sosnowski, R., Kamecki, H., Joniau, S., Walz, J., Klaassen, Z., & Palou, J. (2020). Introduction of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: a challenge for now, an opportunity for the future. European urology, 78(6), 820. Tuckson, R. V., Edmunds, M., & Hodgkins, M. L. (2017). Telehealth. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(16), 1585-1592.
22. Vidal-Alaball, J., Acosta-Roja, R., Pastor Hernández, N., Sanchez Luque, U., Morrison, C., Narejos Pérez, S., ... Garcia Cuyàs, F. (2020). Telemedicine in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Atención Primaria, 52(6), 418-422. doi:10.1016/j.aprim.2020.04.005
23. Weinstein, R. S., Lopez, A. M., Joseph, B. A., & Erps, K. A. (2014). Telemedicine, telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: Opportunities and barriers. American Journal of Medicine, 127(3), 183-187. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.009
24. World Health Organization. (2010). Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States: report on the second global survey on eHealth. World Health Organization.
25. Soyguder, S., (2024). Digital Youth Life Health Platform. Supported by the European Union and the Turkish National Agency. Project number: 2021-2-TR01-KA220-YOU-000049540. (2022), https://www.dyl-hp-aybu.org/