Clear Aligner Therapy for Class II Malocclusion: Treatment Strategies and Clinical Considerations- A Narrative Review
Abstract
Clear aligner therapy has become an important treatment modality in contemporary orthodontics because of its esthetic advantages, improved patient comfort, and continuous advances in digital technology. Although initially indicated for relatively simple malocclusions, its application has expanded to the management of selected Class II malocclusions. Nevertheless, the predictability and effectiveness of clear aligners for sagittal correction remain subjects of ongoing debate. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current treatment strategies for Class II malocclusion using clear aligners, with particular emphasis on clinical indications, treatment protocols, adjunctive mechanics, treatment effectiveness, predictability, and current limitations. The available literature indicates that successful outcomes can be achieved in appropriately selected patients, particularly when clear aligners are combined with auxiliary mechanics such as intermaxillary elastics and temporary anchorage devices. However, treatment predictability decreases as case complexity increases, particularly for complex tooth movements such as root torque, bodily tooth movement, and vertical tooth movements. Careful patient selection, individualized treatment planning, and realistic treatment objectives remain fundamental for successful clinical outcomes. Further high-quality clinical studies are needed to strengthen the current evidence and optimize treatment protocols for Class II malocclusion.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saaidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: A systematic review. Dent Press J Orthod. 2018;23(6):40.e1-10. doi:10.1590/21776709.23.6.40.e1-10.onl.
- McNamara JA Jr. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1981;51(3):177-202.
- Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 6th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2018.
- Zhang M, McGrath C, Hägg U. The impact of malocclusion and its treatment on quality of life: a literature review. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006;16(6):381-7.
- Nguyen Q, Bezemer PD, Habets LLMH, Prahl-Andersen B. A systematic review of the relationship between overjet size and traumatic dental injuries. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21(5):503-15.
- McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984;86(6):449-69.
- Papageorgiou SN, Koletsi D, Iliadi A, Peltomäki T, Eliades T. Treatment outcome with orthodontic aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42(3):331-43.
- Melkos AB. Advances in digital technology and orthodontics: a reference to the Invisalign method. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11(5):PI39-42.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics
Journal Section
Review
Publication Date
August 21, 2026
Submission Date
July 13, 2026
Acceptance Date
August 4, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 1 Number: 2