Çin'de Enerji Tüketimi, Hava Kalitesi ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Asimetrik İlişki

Abstract

Erkekler ve kadınlar arasındaki önemli eşitsizliklerle birlikte, iş yerindeki cinsiyet eşitsizliği Asya'da önemli bir sorun olmaya devam etmektedir. Kadınlar için istihdamın nüfusa oranı 2024 yılında sadece %44,7 iken, bu oran erkekler için ortalama %73,5'tir. Kadınların istihdama katılımının %24,5, erkeklerin katılımının ise %75,3 olduğu Güney Asya, en eşitsiz bölgedir. Doğu ve Güneydoğu Asya'da kadın istihdam oranları sırasıyla %61,2 ve %55,8 ile daha yüksektir, ancak yine de %77'yi aşan erkek katılım oranının altındadır. Başlıca engeller arasında kültürel gelenekler, yetersiz çocuk bakım sistemi ve örgün eğitim ve istihdama sınırlı erişim yer almaktadır. Güney Asya'da bu eşitsizlikler yoksulluk ve eşitsizliği sürdürürken, Doğu ve Güneydoğu Asya'da maaş farklılıkları ve liderlik pozisyonlarında yetersiz temsil kapsayıcı ilerlemeyi engellemektedir. 2014 ve 2024 yılları arasında, sabit etkiler panel veri regresyon yaklaşımı ile, kentleşme, eğitim, ekonomik genişleme ve doğrudan yabancı yatırım (DYY) toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliğinin ilerletilmesinde önemli bir rol oynamıştır. Örneğin, Doğu Asya kentleşme ve eğitimdeki iyileşmeden faydalanmış olsa da, Güney Asya büyük yapısal ve kültürel engellerle karşılaşmaya devam etmektedir. Küçük iyileşmelere rağmen, kadınlar kayıt dışı ve güvencesiz işlerde aşırı temsil edilmeye devam etmekte, bu da ekonomik eşitsizliği artırmaktadır. Bu sorunların ele alınması için eğitimin yaygınlaştırılması, çocuk bakım sistemlerinin güçlendirilmesi, kadın girişimcilerin finansmana erişiminin artırılması ve eşit ücret yasalarının uygulanması gerekmektedir. Toplumsal cinsiyet uçurumunun kapatılması sadece ahlaki açıdan doğru değil, aynı zamanda kapsayıcı büyümeyi ve uzun vadeli bölgesel refahı desteklemek için ekonomik açıdan da önemlidir.

Keywords

• Enerji Tüketimi
• Hava Kalitesi
• Çin
• Yeşil Enerji Politikası

Asymmetric Relationship Between Energy Consumption, Air Quality And Economic Growth In China

Abstract

With significant inequalities between men and women, gender inequality in the workplace remains a significant issue in Asia. The employment-to-population ratio for women was only 44.7% in 2024, compared to an average of 73.5% for men. With women's participation at 24.5% and men's at 75.3%, South Asia is the most unequal area. In East and Southeast Asia, female employment rates are higher at 61.2% and 55.8%, respectively, but they are still below the male participation rate of more than 77%. Among the primary barriers are cultural customs, a subpar childcare system, and limited access to formal education and employment. In South Asia, these disparities perpetuate poverty and inequality, while in East and Southeast Asia, salary gaps and underrepresentation in leadership positions obstruct inclusive progress. Between 2014 and 2024, with fixed effects panel data regression approach, urbanization, education, economic expansion, and foreign direct investment (FDI) all had a significant role in advancing gender equality. For example, although East Asia has benefited from urbanization and improved education, South Asia continues to face major structural and cultural obstacles. Despite slight improvements, women continue to be overrepresented in informal and insecure jobs, which furthers economic inequality. Addressing these issues requires expanding education, strengthening childcare systems, enhancing access to financing for female entrepreneurs, and enforcing laws on equal pay. Closing the gender gap is not only morally right but also economically important to support inclusive growth and long-term regional prosperity.

Keywords

• Energy Consumption
• Air Quality
• China
• Green Energy Policies

References

1. Adebayo, T.S., Awosusi, A.A., Kirikkaleli, D. et al. Can CO2 emissions and energy consumption determine the economic performance of South Korea? A time series analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 38969–38984 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13498-1
2. Allen, David E., and Michael McAleer. 2021. ‘A Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) Analysis of the FTSE and S&P500 Indexes’. Risks 9(11):195. doi: 10.3390/risks9110195.
3. Ampofo GKM, Cheng J, Ayimadu ET, Asante DA. (2021) Investigating the Asymmetric Effect of Economic Growth on Environmental Quality in the Next 11 Countries. Energies. 14(2):491. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020491
4. Anwar, Ahsan, Abdulkadir Barut, Fahrettin Pala, Nurcan Kilinc-Ata, Emine Kaya, and Duong Thi Quynh Lien. 2024. ‘A Different Look at the Environmental Kuznets Curve from the Perspective of Environmental Deterioration and Economic Policy Uncertainty: Evidence from Fragile Countries’. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 31(34):46235–54. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28761-w.
5. Assamoi, G.R., Wang, S.(2023). Asymmetric effects of economic policy uncertainty and environmental policy stringency on environmental quality: evidence from China and the United States. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 29996–30016 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24082-6
6. Ayres, Robert. 1996. ‘Technology, Progress and Economic Growth’. European Management Journal 14(6):562–75. doi: 10.1016/S0263-2373(96)00053-9.
7. Barut, Abdulkadir, Mucahit Citil, Zahoor Ahmed, Avik Sinha, and Shujaat Abbas. 2023. ‘How Do Economic and Financial Factors Influence Green Logistics? A Comparative Analysis of E7 and G7 Nations’. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30(1):1011–22. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22252-0.
8. Barut, Abdulkadir, Emine Kaya, Festus Victor Bekun, and Sevgi Cengiz. 2023. ‘Environmental Sustainability amidst Financial Inclusion in Five Fragile Economies: Evidence from Lens of Environmental Kuznets Curve’. Energy 269:126802. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126802.

9. Cheng, Ya, Usama Awan, Shabbir Ahmad, and Zhixiong Tan. 2021. ‘How Do Technological Innovation and Fiscal Decentralization Affect the Environment? A Story of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Sustainable Growth’. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 162:120398. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120398.
10. Çitil, Mücahit, Metin İlbasmış, Victoria Olushola Olanrewaju, Abdulkadir Barut, Sadık Karaoğlan, and Muhammad Ali. 2023. ‘Does Green Finance and Institutional Quality Play an Important Role in Air Quality’. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30(18):53962–76. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26016-2.
11. Dickey, David A., and Wayne A. Fuller. 1979. ‘Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root’. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74(366):427. doi: 10.2307/2286348.
12. Dong D, Xu B, Shen N, He Q. (2021). The Adverse Impact of Air Pollution on China’s Economic Growth. Sustainability. 2021; 13(16):9056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169056
13. Elliott, Graham, Thomas J. Rothenberg, and James H. Stock. 1996. ‘Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root’. Econometrica 64(4):813–36. doi: 10.2307/2171846.
14. Enders, Walter. 2014. ‘Applied Econometric Time Series, 4th Edition | Wiley’. Wiley.Com. Retrieved 14 August 2023 (https://www.wiley.com/en-au/Applied+Econometric+Time+Series%2C+4th+Edition-p-9781118808566).
15. Engle, Robert. 2002a. ‘Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models’. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 20(3):339–50.
16. Engle, Robert. 2002b. ‘Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models’. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 20(3):339–50.
17. Engle, Robert, and Kevin Sheppard. 2001. Theoretical and Empirical Properties of Dynamic Conditional Correlation Multivariate GARCH. NBER Working Paper. 8554. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
18. Ha, N. M., & Ngoc, B. H. (2021). Revisiting the relationship between energy consumption and economic growth nexus in Vietnam: New evidence by asymmetric ARDL cointegration. Applied Economics Letters, 28(12), 978–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1789543
19. Hamilton, James D. 1989. ‘A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle’. Econometrica 57(2):357–84.
20. İlbasmış, Metin, Mücahit Çitil, Furkan Demirtaş, Muhammad Ali, Abdulkadir Barut, and Mohammad Mohsin. 2023. ‘Does Green Investments Improve Air Quality? Evidence for Developed and Developing European Countries’. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30(38):89726–39. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28544-3.
21. IMF. External Relations Dept. 1971. ‘Finance & Development, March 1971’. Finance & Development 8(1). doi: 10.5089/9781616353025.022.
22. Jiang, W., & Chen, Y. (2020). Asymmetries in the nexus among energy consumption, air quality and economic growth in China. Energy Reports, 6, 3141–3149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.065
23. Jiang, Y., Batool, Z., Raza, S. M. F., Haseeb, M., Ali, S., & Zain Ul Abidin, S. (2022). Analyzing the Asymmetric Effect of Renewable Energy Consumption on Environment in STIRPAT-Kaya-EKC Framework: A NARDL Approach for China. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(12), 7100. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127100
24. Kalfas, Dimitrios, Stavros Kalogiannidis, Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, and Ermelinda Toska. 2023. ‘Urbanization and Land Use Planning for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Case Study of Greece’. Urban Science 7(2):43. doi: 10.3390/urbansci7020043.
25. Kirikkaleli, D., Karmoh Sowah, J. & Addai, K. The asymmetric and long-run effect of energy productivity on environmental quality in Ireland. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 37691–37705 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24832-6
26. Khan, R. (2021). Beta decoupling relationship between CO2 emissions by GDP, energy consumption, electricity production, value-added industries, and population in China. PLOS ONE, 16(4), e0249444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249444
27. Kumari, N., Kumar, P., & Sahu, N. C. (2021). Do energy consumption and environmental quality enhance subjective wellbeing in G20 countries?. Environmental science and pollution research international, 28(42), 60246–60267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14965-5
28. Li, Y., Chiu, Y. H., & Lin, T. Y. (2019). The Impact of Economic Growth and Air Pollution on Public Health in 31 Chinese Cities. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(3), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030393
29. Li, Lele, Tiantian Du, and Chi Zhang. 2020. ‘The Impact of Air Pollution on Healthcare Expenditure for Respiratory Diseases: Evidence from the People’s Republic of China’. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 13:1723–38. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S270587.
30. Liu, Xiaoyu, Ti Zhao, and Ran Li. 2023. ‘Studying the Green Economic Growth with Clean Energy and Green Finance: The Role of Financial Policy’. Renewable Energy 215:118971. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.118971.
31. Mahapatra, B., Irfan, M. Investigating asymmetric impacts of total factor energy efficiency on carbon emissions in India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 55340–55353 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26206-y
32. Mahmood, Haider, Tarek Tawfik Yousef Alkhateeb, and Maham Furqan. 2020. ‘Industrialization, Urbanization and CO2 Emissions in Saudi Arabia: Asymmetry Analysis’. Energy Reports 6:1553–60. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.06.004.
33. Mayoral, Laura. n.d. ‘TRENDS AND UNIT ROOTS’.
34. Ojaghlou, Mortaza, and Erginbay Ugurlu. 2023. ‘URBANIZATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE (EKC) AND STIRPAT ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY’. 16:2023. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2023/16-1/16.
35. Ojaghlou, Mortaza, Erginbay Ugurlu, Marta Kad\lubek, and Eleftherios Thalassinos. 2023. ‘Economic Activities and Management Issues for the Environment: An Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and STIRPAT Analysis in Turkey’. Resources 12(5):57.
36. Qian L., Fernando G-M, Jiang Li, Gang H and Jeremiah X Johnson (2023). Accelerating China’s power sector decarbonization can save lives: integrating public health goals into power sector planning decisions. Environmental Research Letters, Volume 18, Number 10. DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/acf84b
37. Pesaran, M. Hashem, Yongcheol Shin, and Richard J. Smith. 2001. ‘Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships’. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16(3):289–326. doi: 10.1002/jae.616.
38. Rafindadi, A.A. (2014). Econometric Prediction on the Effects of Financial Development and Trade Openness on the German Energy Consumption: A Startling Revelation from the Data Set. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5, 182-196.
39. Rafindadi A.A. & Mika'Ilu, A.S. (2019). Sustainable energy consumption and capital formation: Empirical evidence from the developed financial market of the United Kingdom. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 35, 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2019.07.007
40. Raihan, Asif, and Almagul Tuspekova. 2022. ‘Role of Economic Growth, Renewable Energy, and Technological Innovation to Achieve Environmental Sustainability in Kazakhstan’. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability 4:100165. doi: 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100165.
41. Shin, Yongcheol, Byungchul Yu, and Matthew Greenwood-Nimmo. 2014. ‘Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework’. Pp. 281–314 in Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric Methods and Applications, edited by R. C. Sickles and W. C. Horrace. New York, NY: Springer.
42. Ullah, S., Majeed, M. T., & Chishti, M. Z. (2020). Examining the asymmetric effects of fiscal policy instruments on environmental quality in Asian economies. Environmental science and pollution research international, 27(30), 38287–38299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09859-x
43. Umair, M., Yousuf, M.U. Evaluating the symmetric and asymmetric effects of fossil fuel energy consumption and international capital flows on environmental sustainability: a case of South Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 33992–34008 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24607-z
44. Wajid, A., Prince, N. S., Ayoade, A. I., & Bezon, K. (2022). Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Linkage: Global Evidence from Symmetric and Asymmetric Simulations. Quaestiones Geographicae, 41(2), 67–82.
45. Xie, Y., Xu, M., Pu, J., Pan, Y., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., & Xu, S. (2023). Large-scale renewable energy brings regionally disproportional air quality and health co-benefits in China. iScience, 26(8), 107459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107459
46. Ye Y & Tao Q (2023), The dynamic relationship among economic development, air pollution, and health production in China: the DNSBM efficiency model. Front. Environ. Sci. 11:1205712. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1205712
47. Zeraibi A, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shehzad K. (2020). Examining the Asymmetric Nexus between Energy Consumption, Technological Innovation, and Economic Growth; Does Energy Consumption and Technology Boost Economic Development? Sustainability, 12(21):8867. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218867
48. Zeeshan, M., Han, J., Rehman, A., Ullah, I., & Afridi, F. E. A. (2021). Exploring Asymmetric Nexus Between CO2 Emissions, Environmental Pollution, and Household Health Expenditure in China. Risk management and healthcare policy, 14, 527–539. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S281729
49. Zhang, H., Zhang, D., Qian, W. et al. The ambient air quality standards, green innovation, and urban air quality: evidence from China. Sci Rep 13, 19684 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47112-w
50. Zhao, Pengjun, and Mengzhu Zhang. 2018. ‘The Impact of Urbanisation on Energy Consumption: A 30-Year Review in China’. Urban Climate 24:940–53. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.11.005.